Seismic Velocities and Attenuation from Borehole Measurements near the Parkfield Prediction Zone, Central California

1989 ◽  
Vol 5 (3) ◽  
pp. 513-537 ◽  
Author(s):  
James F. Gibbs ◽  
Edward F. Roth
Keyword(s):  
P Wave ◽  
Depth Interval ◽  
Seismic Velocities ◽  
S Wave ◽  
Wave Source ◽  
Central California ◽  
Unconsolidated Sands ◽  
Wave Velocities ◽  
Average Shear ◽  
Parkfield Earthquake

Shear (S)- and compressional (P)- wave velocities were measured to a depth of 195 m in a borehole near the San Andreas fault where a recurrence of a moderate Parkfield earthquake is predicted. S-wave velocities determined from orthogonal directions of the S-wave source show velocity differences of approximately 20 percent. An average shear-wave Q of 4 was determined in relatively unconsolidated sands and gravels of the Paso Robles Formation in the depth interval 57.5-102.5 m.

Acoustic measurements in unconsolidated sands at low effective pressure and overpressure detection

Geophysics ◽  
2002 ◽  
Vol 67 (2) ◽  
pp. 405-412 ◽  
Author(s):  
Manika Prasad
Keyword(s):  
Wave Velocity ◽  
P Wave ◽  
Acoustic Measurements ◽  
S Wave ◽  
Deepwater Drilling ◽  
Unconsolidated Sands ◽  
Wave Velocities ◽  
P Wave Velocity ◽  
Shallow Water Flows ◽  
Low Pressures

Shallow water flows and over‐pressured zones are a major hazard in deepwater drilling projects. Their detection prior to drilling would save millions of dollars in lost drilling costs. I have investigated the sensitivity of seismic methods for this purpose. Using P‐wave information alone can be ambiguous, because a drop in P‐wave velocity (Vp) can be caused both by overpressure and by presence of gas. The ratio of P‐wave velocity to S‐wave velocity (Vp/Vs), which increases with overpressure and decreases with gas saturation, can help differentiate between the two cases. Since P‐wave velocity in a suspension is slightly below that of the suspending fluid and Vs=0, Vp/Vs and Poisson's ratio must increase exponentially as a load‐bearing sediment approaches a state of suspension. On the other hand, presence of gas will also decrease Vp but Vs will remain unaffected and Vp/Vs will decrease. Analyses of ultrasonic P‐ and S‐wave velocities in sands show that the Vp/Vs ratio, especially at low effective pressures, decreases rapidly with pressure. At very low pressures, Vp/Vs values can be as large as 100 and higher. Above pressures greater than 2 MPa, it plateaus and does not change much with pressure. There is significant change in signal amplitudes and frequency of shear waves below 1 MPa. The current ultrasonic data shows that Vp/Vs values can be invaluable indicators of low differential pressures.

Seismic velocities of unconsolidated sands: Part 1 — Pressure trends from 0.1 to 20 MPa

Geophysics ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 72 (1) ◽  
pp. E1-E13 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael A. Zimmer ◽  
Manika Prasad ◽  
Gary Mavko ◽  
Amos Nur
Keyword(s):  
Shear Wave ◽  
Pressure Dependence ◽  
Glass Bead ◽  
Theoretical Models ◽  
Compressional Wave ◽  
P Wave ◽  
Seismic Velocities ◽  
Unconsolidated Sands ◽  
Wave Velocities ◽  
Shear Wave Velocities

Knowledge of the pressure dependences of seismic velocities in unconsolidated sands is necessary for the remote prediction of effective pressures and for the projection of velocities to unsampled locations within shallow sand layers. We have measured the compressional- and shear-wave velocities and bulk, shear, and P-wave moduli at pressures from [Formula: see text] in a series of unconsolidated granular samples including dry and water-saturated natural sands and dry synthetic sand and glass-bead samples. The shear-wave velocities in these samples demonstrate an average pressure dependence approximately proportional to the fourth root of the effective pressure [Formula: see text], as commonly observed at lower pressures. For the compressional-wave velocities, theexponent in the pressure dependence of individual dry samples is consistently less than the exponent for the shear-wave velocity of the same sample, averaging 0.23 for the dry sands and 0.20 for the glass-bead samples. These pressure dependences are generally consistent over the entire pressure range measured. A comparison of the empirical results to theoretical predictions based on Hertz-Mindlin effective-medium models demonstrates that the theoretical models vastly overpredict the shear moduli of the dry granular frame unless the contacts are assumed to have no tangential stiffness. The models also predict a lower pressure exponent for the moduli and velocities [Formula: see text] than is generally observed in the data. We attribute this discrepancy in part to the inability of the models to account for decreases in the amount of slip or grain rotation occurring at grain-to-grain contacts with increasing pressure.

Viscoelasticity of precompacted unconsolidated sand with viscous cement

Geophysics ◽  
2006 ◽  
Vol 71 (2) ◽  
pp. T31-T40 ◽  
Author(s):  
Klaus C. Leurer ◽  
Jack Dvorkin
Keyword(s):  
Viscous Fluid ◽  
Contact Stiffness ◽  
Frequency Dispersion ◽  
P Wave ◽  
Seismic Velocities ◽  
Effective Pressure ◽  
S Wave ◽  
Normal Stiffness ◽  
Cemented Sand ◽  
Wave Velocities

The elastic properties of sand strongly depend on the grains’ contact stiffness, which can be increased significantly by solid matter and, depending on frequency, viscous fluid acting as contact cement. To calculate seismic velocities in precompacted fluid-cemented sand, we examine how a small amount of viscous fluid at the grain contacts influences their normal and tangential stiffnesses as a function of effective pressure. Using the Hertz-Mindlin approach and considering oscillatory loading in addition to precompaction of a combination of two elastic spheres, we extend the dry-contact elastic theory by a viscoelastic formulation. Here, we describe the radial flow of the fluid cement induced by the oscillations of the grains’ surfaces around the direct contact, a process that leads to a complex normal stiffness and stiffness/frequency dispersion. In the resulting combined model, the low-frequency real part of the complex normal stiffness identical is to the original Hertz-Mindlin expression. The magnitude of the dispersion is governed by the amount of viscous cement; magnitude decreases as effective pressure increases. The frequency of the maximum imaginary part of the normal stiffness is determined mainly by cement viscosity and contact geometry. The tangential contact stiffness virtually is not influenced by the viscous fluid. Comparison of predicted results with data from pulse transmission experiments (500 kHz) on glass beads with two different fluids shows an excellent fit in P-wave velocities [Formula: see text], whereas S-wave velocities [Formula: see text] are systematically overestimated by the model. The experimental results confirm, however, the predicted change with effective pressure in the [Formula: see text] ratio for both examined cases as well as reflect the predicted increase in [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text], respectively, between the two cases. This implies that our viscoelastic formulation represents a reasonable way to describe the role of viscous cement in sand.

Seismological studies in a rock body at Chalk River, Ontario and their relation to fractures

1982 ◽  
Vol 19 (8) ◽  
pp. 1535-1547 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. Wright
Keyword(s):  
Wave Velocity ◽  
Test Site ◽  
P Wave ◽  
Seismic Velocities ◽  
S Wave ◽  
P Waves ◽  
Rock Body ◽  
Near Surface ◽  
Wave Velocities ◽  
P Wave Velocity

Seismological experiments have been undertaken at a test site near Chalk River, Ontario that consists of crystalline rocks covered by glacial sediments. Near-surface P and S wave velocity and amplitude variations have been measured along profiles less than 2 km in length. The P and S wave velocities were generally in the range 4.5–5.6 and 2.9–3.2 km/s, respectively. These results are consistent with propagation through fractured gneiss and monzonite, which form the bulk of the rock body. The P wave velocity falls below 5.0 km/s in a region where there is a major fault and in an area of high electrical conductivity; such velocity minima are therefore associated with fracture systems. For some paths, the P and 5 wave velocities were in the ranges 6.2–6.6 and 3.7–4.1 km/s, respectively, showing the presence of thin sheets of gabbro. Temporal changes in P travel times of up to 1.4% over a 12 h period were observed where the sediment cover was thickest. The cause may be changes in the water table. The absence of polarized SH arrivals from specially designed shear wave sources indicates the inhomogeneity of the test site. A Q value of 243 ± 53 for P waves was derived over one relatively homogeneous profile of about 600 m length. P wave velocity minima measured between depths of 25 and 250 m in a borehole correlate well with the distribution of fractures inferred from optical examination of borehole cores, laboratory measurements of seismic velocities, and tube wave studies.

scholarly journals LOCAL LOW PRESSURE AREAS IN ANTICLINE STRUCTURES

2015 ◽  
Vol 33 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Boris P. Sibiryakov ◽  
Lourenildo W.B. Leite ◽  
Egor P. Sibiryakov ◽  
Wildney W.S. Vieira
Keyword(s):  
Oil And Gas ◽  
Target Surface ◽  
Sedimentary Basins ◽  
P Wave ◽  
Necessary Condition ◽  
Seismic Velocities ◽  
S Wave ◽  
Wave Velocities ◽  
Horizontal Boundary ◽  
Constitutive Parameters

ABSTRACT. In order to localize low pressures zones in sedimentary basins for oil and gas exploration, it is necessary to know P and S wave velocities for medium. Strictly speaking, we need to know the rock densities for all layers, and in addition there are many correlation tables between seismic velocities and densities; besides, density is a parameter admitted to change slowly with depth to the top of the target interface. P wave velocities are considered a conventional asset, and S wave velocities can be obtained from special field survey, in particular from converted P-S waves registered by VSP technology, and by petrophysical measurements. The theory in this paper deals with stress prediction in the subsurface, and takes in consideration the constitutive parameters (density and Lame’s), and the geometry of the reservoir target surface. The model does not separate the different contributions (porosity, fluids) to the rock velocities controlled by the constitutive parameters. It is not a necessary condition that an anticline be a potential structure for oil and gas accumulation. This role can be played by horizontal structures if there is a positive γ = VS VPratio discontinuity, or a negative discontinuity of the Poisson, σ, ratio across the horizontal boundary. These conditions are responsible for producing a pressure discontinuity, such that beneath the boundary there will be a sufficiently lower pressure zone than above the boundary. In this case, the lower horizontal boundary is saidto be an attractor surface for fluids of the any kind; in the opposite case, this boundary does not have fluid attractor properties.Keywords: seismic structured media, porous media, anticline structures, pressure prediction.RESUMO. Com o objetivo de localizar zonas de baixa pressão em bacias sedimentares voltadas à exploração de óleo e gás, é necessário conhecer as velocidades das ondas P e S para o meio. Mais especificamente, precisamos conhecer a densidade das rochas em todas as camadas, e aditivamente existem várias tabelas de correlação entre velocidade e densidade das rochas; além disso, é um parâmetro que varia lentamente com a profundidade até o topo da interface-alvo. A velocidade das ondas P é considerada uma informação convencional, e a velocidade das ondas S pode ser obtida por levantamentos especiais de campo, em particular a partir da conversão P-S registrada por tecnologia VSP, e por medidas petrofísicas. A teoria deste trabalho trata da predição de tensão na subsuperfície, e leva em consideração os parâmetros constitutivos (densidade e de Lamé), e a topografia em superfície do reservatório-alvo. O modelo não separa as diferentes contribuições (porosidade e fluidos) para estabelecer as velocidades nas rochas controladas pelos parâmetros constitutivos. Não é uma condição necessária que uma superfície anticlinal seja uma estrutura potencial para o acúmulo de óleo e gás. Esta condição pode ser representada por uma superfície horizontal, se existir uma discontinuidade na razão γ = VS VP, ou uma descontinuidade negativa na razão de Poisson, σ, através da superfície. Estas condições são responsáveis por produzir uma descontinuidade de pressão, de tal forma que abaixo da interface existirá uma zona de pressão mais baixa do que há acima da mesma. Neste caso, a parte inferior da superfície é considerada como um atrativo de fluidos de qualquer tipo; e no caso oposto, esta superfície não ´e dotada de propriedades de atração de fluidos.Palavras-chave: meios sísmicos estruturados, meios porosos, meios fraturados.

Impact of change in pore-fill material on P-wave velocity

Geophysics ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 79 (6) ◽  
pp. D399-D407 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nishank Saxena ◽  
Gary Mavko
Keyword(s):  
Shear Modulus ◽  
Wave Velocity ◽  
P Wave ◽  
Exact Equation ◽  
Fluid Substitution ◽  
Seismic Velocities ◽  
S Wave ◽  
Wave Velocities ◽  
Fill Material ◽  
P Wave Velocity

The problem of predicting the change in seismic velocities (P-wave and S-wave) upon the change in pore-fill material properties is commonly known as substitution. For isotropic rocks, P- and S-wave velocities are fundamentally linked to the effective P-wave and shear moduli. The change in the S-wave velocity or shear modulus upon fluid substitution can be predicted with Gassmann’s equations starting only with the initial S-wave velocity. However, predicting changes in P-wave velocity or the P-wave modulus requires knowledge of the initial P- and S-wave velocities. We initiated a rigorous derivation of the P-wave modulus for fluid and solid substitution in monomineralic isotropic rocks for cases in which an estimate of the S-wave velocity or shear modulus is not available. For the general case of solid substitution, the exact equation for the P-wave modulus depends on parameters that are usually unknown. However, for fluid substitution, fewer parameters are required. As Poisson’s ratio increases for the mineral in the rock frame, the dependence of exact substitution on these unknown parameters decreases. As a result, in the absence of shear velocity, P-wave modulus fluid substitution can, for example, be performed with higher confidence for rocks with a calcite or dolomite frame than it can for rocks with quartz frame. We evaluated a recipe for applying the new P-wave modulus fluid substitution. This improves on existing work and is recommended for practice.

Seismic velocities in transversely isotropic media, II

Geophysics ◽  
1980 ◽  
Vol 45 (1) ◽  
pp. 3-17 ◽  
Author(s):  
Franklyn K. Levin
Keyword(s):  
Wave Velocity ◽  
Transversely Isotropic ◽  
P Wave ◽  
Seismic Velocities ◽  
Sh Wave ◽  
S Wave ◽  
Wave Velocities ◽  
P Wave Velocity ◽  
Surface Spread ◽  
Isotropic Solids

P‐wave, SV‐wave, and SH‐wave velocities are computed for transversely isotropic solids formed from two isotropic solids. The combinations are shale‐sandstone and shale‐limestone solids of an earlier paper (Levin, 1979), but one velocity of the nonshale component is allowed to vary over the range of Poisson’s ratios σ = 0 to σ = 0.45, i.e., from a rigid solid to a near‐liquid. When the S‐wave velocity of either the sandstone or limestone is varied, the ratio of horizontal P‐wave velocity to vertical P‐wave velocity goes through a maximum as σ increases and subsequently falls to values less than unity as σ approaches 0.5. The P‐wave velocity that would be found with a short surface spread also goes through a maximum and, at σ = 0.5, is less than the P‐wave velocity of either isotropic component. SV‐wave velocities found for data from a short spread are unreasonably large; SH‐wave velocities decrease monotonically as σ increases, but the ratio of horizontal SH‐wave velocity to vertical SH‐wave velocity goes through a minimum of unity.

scholarly journals Subsonic near-surface P-velocity and low S-velocity observations using propagator inversion

Geophysics ◽  
2005 ◽  
Vol 70 (4) ◽  
pp. R15-R23 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robbert van Vossen ◽  
Andrew Curtis ◽  
Jeannot Trampert
Keyword(s):  
Shear Velocity ◽  
Confining Pressure ◽  
Compressional Wave ◽  
P Wave ◽  
Soil Conditions ◽  
Detailed Knowledge ◽  
S Wave ◽  
Near Surface ◽  
Unconsolidated Sands ◽  
Wave Velocities

Detailed knowledge of near-surface P- and S-wave velocities is important for processing and interpreting multicomponent land seismic data because (1) the entire wavefield passes through and is influenced by the near-surface soil conditions, (2) both source repeatability and receiver coupling also depend on these conditions, and (3) near-surface P- and S-wave velocities are required for wavefield decomposition and demultiple methods. However, it is often difficult to measure these velocities with conventional techniques because sensitivity to shallow-wave velocities is low and because of the presence of sharp velocity contrasts or gradients close to the earth's free surface. We demonstrate that these near-surface P- and S-wave velocities can be obtained using a propagator inversion. This approach requires data recorded by at least one multicomponent geophone at the surface and an additional multicomponent geophone at depth. The propagator between them then contains all information on the medium parameters governing wave propagation between the geophones at the surface and at depth. Hence, inverting the propagator gives local estimates for these parameters. This technique has been applied to data acquired in Zeist, the Netherlands. The near-surface sediments at this site are unconsolidated sands with a thin vegetation soil on top, and the sediments considered are located above the groundwater table. A buried geophone was positioned 1.05 m beneath receivers on the surface. Propagator inversion yielded low near-surface velocities, namely, 270 ± 15 m/s for the compressional-wave velocity, which is well below the sound velocity in air, and 150 ± 9 m/s for the shear velocity. Existing methods designed for imaging deeper structures cannot resolve these shallow material properties. Furthermore, velocities usually increase rapidly with depth close to the earth's surface because of increasing confining pressure. We suspect that for this reason, subsonic near-surface P-wave velocities are not commonly observed.

Seismic velocities of unconsolidated sands: Part 2 — Influence of sorting- and compaction-induced porosity variation

Geophysics ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 72 (1) ◽  
pp. E15-E25 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael A. Zimmer ◽  
Manika Prasad ◽  
Gary Mavko ◽  
Amos Nur
Keyword(s):  
Compressional Wave ◽  
P Wave ◽  
Unconsolidated Sediments ◽  
Seismic Velocities ◽  
Porosity Variation ◽  
Unconsolidated Sands ◽  
Wave Velocities ◽  
Grain Size Distributions ◽  
Gassmann Fluid Substitution ◽  
Water Saturated

Unaccounted-for porosity variation in unconsolidated sediments can cloud the interpretation of the sediment’s seismic velocities for factors such as fluid content and pressure. However, an understanding of the effects of porosity variation on the velocities can permit the remote characterization of porosity with seismic methods. We present the results of a series of measurements designed to isolate the effects of sorting- and compaction-induced porosity variation on the seismic velocities and their pressure dependences in clean, unconsolidated sands. We prepared a set of texturally similar sand and glass-bead samples with controlled grain-size distributions to cover an initial porosity range from 0.26 to 0.44. We measured the compressional- and shear-wave velocities and porosity of dry samples over a series of hydrostatic pressure cycles from [Formula: see text]. Over this rangeof porosities, the velocities of the dry samples at a given pressure vary by [Formula: see text]. However, the water-saturated compressional-wave velocities, modeled with Gassmann fluid substitution, demonstrate a consistent increase with decreasing porosity. In both the dry and water-saturated cases, the porosity trend at a given pressure is approximately described by the isostress (harmonic) average between the moduli of the highest-porosity sample at that pressure and the moduli of quartz, the predominant mineral component of the samples. Empirical power-law fit coefficients describing the pressure dependences of the dry bulk, shear, and constrained (P-wave) moduli from each sample also demonstrate no significant, systematic relationship with the porosity. The porosity dependence of the water-saturated bulk and constrained moduli is primarily contained in the empirical coefficient representing the modulus at zero pressure.

Shallow velocity structure and poisson's ratio at the Tarzana, California, strong-motion accelerometer site

1996 ◽  
Vol 86 (6) ◽  
pp. 1704-1713 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. D. Catchings ◽  
W. H. K. Lee
Keyword(s):  
Urban Areas ◽  
Velocity Structure ◽  
Strong Motion ◽  
P Wave ◽  
S Wave ◽  
Near Surface ◽  
Velocity Models ◽  
Wave Velocities ◽  
Poisson's Ratios ◽  
Poisson’S Ratios

Abstract The 17 January 1994, Northridge, California, earthquake produced strong ground shaking at the Cedar Hills Nursery (referred to here as the Tarzana site) within the city of Tarzana, California, approximately 6 km from the epicenter of the mainshock. Although the Tarzana site is on a hill and is a rock site, accelerations of approximately 1.78 g horizontally and 1.2 g vertically at the Tarzana site are among the highest ever instrumentally recorded for an earthquake. To investigate possible site effects at the Tarzana site, we used explosive-source seismic refraction data to determine the shallow (<70 m) P-and S-wave velocity structure. Our seismic velocity models for the Tarzana site indicate that the local velocity structure may have contributed significantly to the observed shaking. P-wave velocities range from 0.9 to 1.65 km/sec, and S-wave velocities range from 0.20 and 0.6 km/sec for the upper 70 m. We also found evidence for a local S-wave low-velocity zone (LVZ) beneath the top of the hill. The LVZ underlies a CDMG strong-motion recording site at depths between 25 and 60 m below ground surface (BGS). Our velocity model is consistent with the near-surface (<30 m) P- and S-wave velocities and Poisson's ratios measured in a nearby (<30 m) borehole. High Poisson's ratios (0.477 to 0.494) and S-wave attenuation within the LVZ suggest that the LVZ may be composed of highly saturated shales of the Modelo Formation. Because the lateral dimensions of the LVZ approximately correspond to the areas of strongest shaking, we suggest that the highly saturated zone may have contributed to localized strong shaking. Rock sites are generally considered to be ideal locations for site response in urban areas; however, localized, highly saturated rock sites may be a hazard in urban areas that requires further investigation.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document