Modeling Building Classes Using Moment Matching

2016 ◽  
Vol 32 (1) ◽  
pp. 285-301 ◽  
Author(s):  
In Ho Cho ◽  
Keith Porter

Large-scale earthquake risk assessment necessitates models of the seismic performance of building classes. This work addresses how to depict a class with only a few (index) buildings whose designs span the attributes that most impact the seismic behavior of the class. We propose a general numerical moment matching (MM) technique to represent those seismic attributes of index buildings, which can then be individually analyzed by second-generation performance-based earthquake engineering methods (PBEE-2). The results probabilistically combined to model the class behavior as a whole. Thereby, the model honors the joint distribution of variable features within the class and propagates all other uncertainties that PBEE-2 already recognizes. Importantly, we can reflect and propagate with rigor the uncertain attributes of buildings within a class, notably without resorting to standard distributions. The MM enables PBEE-2 to rigorously capture seismic risk assessment of a building class.

2011 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
pp. 359-366 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. M. Gaspar-Escribano ◽  
T. Iturrioz

Abstract. Earthquake risk assessment is probably the most effective tool for reducing adverse earthquake effects and for developing pre- and post-event planning actions. The related risk information (data and results) is of interest for persons with different backgrounds and interests, including scientists, emergency planners, decision makers and other stakeholders. Hence, it is important to ensure that this information is properly transferred to all persons involved in seismic risk, considering the nature of the information and the particular circumstances of the source and of the receiver of the information. Some experience-based recommendations about the parameters and the graphical representations that can be used to portray earthquake risk information to different types of audiences are presented in this work.


Author(s):  
S. T. Algermissen

The principal elements of seismic risk assessment are outlined. An approach to seismic risk assessment is developed that provides quite satisfactory risk assessments on a scale of a single structure to regional assessments of risk. An example of a contemporary risk assessment is discussed and the development of a data base for routine risk assessments is advocated.


2020 ◽  
Vol 5 (3) ◽  
pp. 22 ◽  
Author(s):  
Giacomo Sevieri ◽  
Anna De Falco ◽  
Giovanni Marmo

The seismic risk assessment of existing concrete gravity dams is of primary importance for our society because of the fundamental role of these infrastructures in the sustainability of a country. The seismic risk assessment of dams is a challenging task due to the lack of case histories, such as gravity dams’ seismic collapses, which hinders the definition of limit states, thus making the application of any conventional safety assessment approach difficult. Numerical models are then fundamental to predict the seismic behaviour of the complex dam-soil-reservoir interacting system, even though uncertainties strongly affect the results. These uncertainties, mainly related to mechanical parameters and variability of the seismic motion, are among the reasons that, so far, prevented the performance-based earthquake engineering approach from being applied to concrete dams. This paper discusses the main issues behind the application of the performance-based earthquake engineering to existing concrete dams, with particular emphasis on the fragility analysis. After a critical review of the most relevant studies on this topic, the analysis of an Italian concrete gravity dam is presented to show the effect of epistemic uncertainties on the calculation of seismic fragility curves. Finally, practical conclusions are derived to guide professionals to the reduction of epistemic uncertainties, and to the definition of reliable numerical models.


2021 ◽  
Vol 242 ◽  
pp. 112532
Author(s):  
Zhenhua Huang ◽  
Liping Cai ◽  
Yashica Pandey ◽  
Yong Tao ◽  
William Telone

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Febriana Kuscahyadi ◽  
Irwan Meilano ◽  
Nuraini Rahma Hanifa ◽  
Riantini Virtriana

2015 ◽  
Vol 9 (4) ◽  
pp. 719-733 ◽  
Author(s):  
Adolfo Preciado ◽  
Alejandro Ramirez-Gaytan ◽  
Ricardo A. Salido-Ruiz ◽  
Juan L. Caro-Becerra ◽  
Ramiro Lujan-Godinez

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document