scholarly journals Involuntary out-patient commitment: 2-year follow-up

2013 ◽  
Vol 37 (2) ◽  
pp. 60-64 ◽  
Author(s):  
Laura Castells-Aulet ◽  
Miguel Hernández-Viadel ◽  
Pedro Asensio-Pascual ◽  
Carlos Cañete-Nicolás ◽  
Carmen Bellido-Rodríguez ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mental Disorder ◽  
Emergency Room ◽  
Average Length ◽  
Length Of Hospital Stay ◽  
Delusional Disorder ◽  
Emergency Room Visits ◽  
Court Order ◽  
Severe Mental Disorder ◽  
The Impact

Aims and methodTo evaluate the impact of involuntary out-patient commitment (OPC) in patients with severe mental disorder who use hospital services. This is a retrospective–observational study in a population of 91 patients under OPC. The psychiatric diagnosis, sociodemographic variables, who requested the court order and for what motive were studied. The study also looked at the use of the available health services (emergency room visits, admissions, average length of hospital stay) for the period beginning 2 years before and ending 2 years after the initiation of the OPC.ResultsThe number of emergency room visits, admissions and the length of hospitalisation diminished in the 2 years following the initiation of the OPC. In terms of diagnosis, the OPC has the most impact on individuals with schizophrenia and delusional disorder.Clinical implicationsThe OPC can be useful for certain patients with severe mental disorder, particularly individuals with schizophrenia and delusional disorder.

scholarly journals A78 THE IMPACT OFGASTROINTESTINAL FOLLOW UP CARE ON HEALTHCARE UTILIZATION IN PATIENTS WITH ESINOPHILICESOPHAGITID (EOE).

2021 ◽  
Vol 4 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 45-46
Author(s):  
K Alazemi ◽  
M Alkhattabi ◽  
J C Gregor
Keyword(s):  
Emergency Room ◽  
Healthcare Utilization ◽  
Attrition Rate ◽  
Quality Improvement Initiative ◽  
Food Impaction ◽  
Emergency Room Visits ◽  
True Rate ◽  
Funding Agencies ◽  
The Impact

Abstract Background EOE is an increasingly recognized gastrointestinal condition that causes significant morbidity ranging from dietary limitations to food impactions requiring emergency room visits. There are a variety of dietary, pharmacologic and endoscopic treatments available but most are more practically guided by a subspecialist familiar and experienced with the condition. There is a perception among some physicians that follow up is sporadic and may be related at least in part to patient compliance. Aims To assess the true rate of EOE patients follow up rate at Lodon Health Scince Center Methods We used a retrospective cohort of patients diagnosed with EoE between July 2011 and June 2014 who met the traditional diagnostic criteria. As part of a quality improvement initiative, local follow up over the ensuing 5–7 years was tracked. The impact of follow up on subsequent healthcare utilization was analyzed. Results 123 patients with biopsy confirmed EoE were analyzed. Follow up appointments were made for 114/123 (92%) patients. 55/123 (45%) had repeat elective endoscopy booked. Only 10/114 (8.7%) of initial appointments went unattended but 15/55 (27.2%) of the patients offered ongoing follow up failed to attend. There were no complications (ie. perforation or bleeding) attributable to any of the procedures. 5/123 (4%) patients required repeat emergency room endoscopy for food impaction. Two patients required this on multiple occasions. 4/5 patients requiring repeat emergency room endoscopy for food impaction had received some sort of follow up, although 4/5 of these had at least one missed appointment. 2/5 patients having emergency room endoscopy required overnight admission. There were no perforations in the cohort. Conclusions Patients with a confirmed diagnosis of EOE do have a risk of requiring subsequent emergency endoscopy for food impaction although it is not clear that scheduled follow up significantly reduces that risk. Contrary to the perception of some physicians, patients with EoE are very likely to attend their first follow up visit although the attrition rate for subsequent scheduled visits is not insignificant. Funding Agencies None

The impact of pharmacist telephone calls after discharge on satisfaction of oncology patients: A randomized controlled study

2017 ◽  
Vol 24 (5) ◽  
pp. 359-364 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sewar S Salmany ◽  
Lujeen Ratrout ◽  
Abdallah Amireh ◽  
Randa Agha ◽  
Noor Nassar ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Emergency Room ◽  
Hospital Readmissions ◽  
Randomized Controlled Study ◽  
Controlled Study ◽  
Emergency Room Visits ◽  
Oncology Patients ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
The Impact

Purpose The aim of the study was to determine the impact of telephone follow-up calls on satisfaction in oncology patients after hospital discharge. Method A randomized controlled study, in which patients were randomized into two groups: The experimental group with the telephone follow-up (TFU) calls (intervention) and the control group (no intervention). The telephone follow-up call was conducted within 72 h after discharge. During the call, patients were asked about their medications, namely, whether they received them, understood how to take them, and whether they developed any medication-related adverse effect. Both groups were contacted by phone two weeks later to assess their satisfaction with the discharge medication instructions and the provided pharmaceutical services, using the 5-point Likert scale. In addition, hospital records were reviewed for emergency room visits and hospital readmissions within 30 days after discharge. Results There was no difference in the percentage of patients who reported being very satisfied between both the intervention and the control groups (45% intervention vs. 48% control, P = 0.68). The mean time of the intervention phone call was 3 ± 1.7 (SD) min. During the telephone follow-up call, medication-related problems were identified in 20% of the patients. There was no significant difference in emergency room visits and hospital readmissions in the intervention group vs. control (44% vs. 53%, P = 0.123) and (37% vs. 43%, P = 0.317), respectively. Conclusion Telephone follow-up calls conducted by a pharmacist to discharged oncology patients did not improve patients' satisfaction, emergency room visits or hospital readmissions; however, they helped to identify medication-related adverse effects in the oncology patients.

scholarly journals A84 THE IMPACT OF GASTROINTESTINAL FOLLOW UP CARE ON HEALTHCARE UTILIZATION IN PATIENTS WITH EOSINOPHILIC ESOPHAGITIS (EOE).

2021 ◽  
Vol 4 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 53-54
Author(s):  
K Alazemi ◽  
M Alkhattabi ◽  
J C Gregor
Keyword(s):  
Emergency Room ◽  
Healthcare Utilization ◽  
Attrition Rate ◽  
Quality Improvement Initiative ◽  
Food Impaction ◽  
Emergency Room Visits ◽  
Funding Agencies ◽  
Follow Up Care ◽  
The Impact

Abstract Background EoE is an increasingly recognized gastrointestinal condition that causes significant morbidity ranging from dietary limitations to food impactions requiring emergency room visits. There are a variety of dietary, pharmacologic and endoscopic treatments available but most are more practically guided by a subspecialist familiar and experienced with the condition. There is a perception among some physicians that follow up is sporadic and may be related at least in part to patient compliance Aims To assess patients with EoE utilization of health care in LHSC Methods We used a retrospective cohort of patients diagnosed with EoE between July 2011 and June 2014 who met the traditional diagnostic criteria. As part of a quality improvement initiative, local follow up over the ensuing 5–7 years was tracked. The impact of follow up on subsequent healthcare utilization was analyzed. Results 123 patients with biopsy confirmed EoE were analyzed. Follow up appointments were made for 114/123 (92%) patients. 55/123 (45%) had repeat elective endoscopy booked. Only 10/114 (8.7%) of initial appointments went unattended but 15/55 (27.2%) of the patients offered ongoing follow up failed to attend. There were no complications (ie. perforation or bleeding) attributable to any of the procedures. 5/123 (4%) patients required repeat emergency room endoscopy for food impaction. Two patients required this on multiple occasions. 4/5 patients requiring repeat emergency room endoscopy for food impaction had received some sort of follow up, although 4/5 of these had at least one missed appointment. 2/5 patients having emergency room endoscopy required overnight admission. There were no perforations in the cohort. Conclusions Patients with a confirmed diagnosis of EoE do have a risk of requiring subsequent emergency endoscopy for food impaction although it is not clear that scheduled follow up significantly reduces that risk. Contrary to the perception of some physicians, patients with EoE are very likely to attend their first follow up visit although the attrition rate for subsequent scheduled visits is not insignificant. Funding Agencies None

Pilonidal Sinus: How to Choose Between Excision and Open Granulation Versus Excision and Primary Closure?

Swiss Surgery ◽  
2002 ◽  
Vol 8 (6) ◽  
pp. 255-258 ◽  
Author(s):  
Perruchoud ◽  
Vuilleumier ◽  
Givel
Keyword(s):  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Pilonidal Sinus ◽  
Primary Closure ◽  
Average Length ◽  
Length Of Hospital Stay ◽  
Healing Time ◽  
Incision And Drainage ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Primary Healing

Aims: The purpose of this study was to evaluate excision and open granulation versus excision and primary closure as treatments for pilonidal sinus. Subjects and methods: We evaluated a group of 141 patients operated on for a pilonidal sinus between 1991 and 1995. Ninety patients were treated by excision and open granulation, 34 patients by excision and primary closure and 17 patients by incision and drainage, as a unique treatment of an infected pilonidal sinus. Results: The first group, receiving treatment of excision and open granulation, experienced the following outcomes: average length of hospital stay, four days; average healing time; 72 days; average number of post-operative ambulatory visits, 40; average off-work delay, 38 days; and average follow-up time, 43 months. There were five recurrences (6%) in this group during the follow-up period. For the second group treated by excision and primary closure, the corresponding outcome measurements were as follows: average length of hospital stay, four days; average healing time, 23 days; primary healing failure rate, 9%; average number of post-operative ambulatory visits, 6; average off-work delay, 21 days. The average follow-up time was 34 months, and two recurrences (6%) were observed during the follow-up period. In the third group, seventeen patients benefited from an incision and drainage as unique treatment. The mean follow-up was 37 months. Five recurrences (29%) were noticed, requiring a new operation in all the cases. Discussion and conclusion: This series of 141 patients is too limited to permit final conclusions to be drawn concerning significant advantages of one form of treatment compared to the other. Nevertheless, primary closure offers the advantages of quicker healing time, fewer post-operative visits and shorter time off work. When a primary closure can be carried out, it should be routinely considered for socio-economical and comfort reasons.

scholarly journals Examining the impact of mental disease on type 2 diabetes outcomes: results from the EpiChron Cohort

2020 ◽  
Vol 30 (Supplement_5) ◽  
Author(s):  
I Guerrero Fernández de Alba ◽  
A Gimeno-Miguel ◽  
B Poblador Plou ◽  
K Bliek Bueno ◽  
J Carmona Pirez ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Type 2 Diabetes ◽  
Substance Abuse ◽  
Early Detection ◽  
Health Outcomes ◽  
Emergency Room ◽  
Mental Disease ◽  
Emergency Room Visits ◽  
Mental Diseases ◽  
The Impact

Abstract Background Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2D) is often accompanied by other chronic diseases, including mental diseases (MD). This work aimed at studying MD prevalence in T2D patients and analyse its impact on T2D health outcomes. Methods Retrospective, observational study of individuals of the EpiChron Cohort aged 18 and over with prevalent T2D at baseline (2011) in Aragón, Spain (n = 63,365). Participants were categorized by the existence or absence of MD, defined as the presence of depression, anxiety, schizophrenia or substance abuse. MD prevalence was calculated, and a logistic regression model was performed to analyse the likelihood of the four studied health outcomes (4-year all-cause mortality, all-cause hospitalization, T2D-hospitalization, and emergency room visits) based on the presence of each type of MD, after adjusting by age, sex and number of comorbidities. Results Mental diseases were observed in 19% of T2D patients, with depression being the most frequent condition, especially in women (20.7% vs. 7.57%). Mortality risk was significantly higher in patients with MD (odds ratio -OR- 1.24; 95% confidence interval -CI- 1.16-1.31), especially in those with substance abuse (OR 2.18; 95% CI 1.84-2.57) and schizophrenia (OR 1.82; 95% CI 1.50-2.21). The presence of MD also increased the risk of T2D-hospitalization (OR 1.51; 95% CI 1.18-1.93), emergency room visits (OR 1.26; 95% CI 1.21-1.32) and all-cause hospitalization (OR 1.16; 95% CI 1.10-1.23). Conclusions The high prevalence of MD among T2D patients, and its association with health outcomes, underscores the importance of providing integrated, person-centred care and early detection of comorbid mental diseases in T2D patients to improve disease management and health outcomes. Key messages Comprehensive care of T2D should include specific strategies for prevention, early detection, and management of comorbidities, especially mental disorders, in order to reduce their impact on health. Substance abuse was the mental disease with the highest risk of T2D-hospitalization, emergency room visits and all-cause hospitalization.

scholarly journals What is the impact of multimorbidity on the risk of hospitalisation in older adults? A systematic review study protocol

BMJ Open ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (6) ◽  
pp. e049974
Author(s):  
Luciana Pereira Rodrigues ◽  
Andréa Toledo de Oliveira Rezende ◽  
Letícia de Almeida Nogueira e Moura ◽  
Bruno Pereira Nunes ◽  
Matias Noll ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Older Adults ◽  
Study Protocol ◽  
Average Length ◽  
Length Of Hospital Stay ◽  
Case Control Studies ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Review Study ◽  
The Impact

IntroductionThe development of multiple coexisting chronic diseases (multimorbidity) is increasing globally, along with the percentage of older adults affected by it. Multimorbidity is associated with the concomitant use of multiple medications, a greater possibility of adverse effects, and increased risk of hospitalisation. Therefore, this systematic review study protocol aims to analyse the impact of multimorbidity on the occurrence of hospitalisation in older adults and assess whether this impact changes according to factors such as sex, age, institutionalisation and socioeconomic status. This study will also review the average length of hospital stay and the occurrence of hospital readmission.Methods and analysisA systematic review of the literature will be carried out using the PubMed, Embase and Scopus databases. The inclusion criteria will incorporate cross-sectional, cohort and case–control studies that analysed the association between multimorbidity (defined as the presence of ≥2 and/or ≥3 chronic conditions and complex multimorbidity) and hospitalisation (yes/no, days of hospitalisation and number of readmissions) in older adults (aged ≥60 years or >65 years). Effect measures will be quantified, including ORs, prevalence ratios, HRs and relative risk, along with their associated 95% CI. The overall aim of this study is to widen knowledge and to raise reflections about the association between multimorbidity and hospitalisation in older adults. Ultimately, its findings may contribute to improvements in public health policies resulting in cost reductions across healthcare systems.Ethics and disseminationEthical approval is not required. The results will be disseminated via submission for publication to a peer-reviewed journal when complete.PROSPERO registration numberCRD42021229328.

scholarly journals Why do frail patients with chronic heart failure die and become hospitalised?

2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
S Sze ◽  
P Pellicori ◽  
J Zhang ◽  
J Weston ◽  
A.L Clark
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Cause Of Death ◽  
Hospital Admissions ◽  
Average Length ◽  
Significant Proportion ◽  
Length Of Hospital Stay ◽  
Clinical Frailty Scale ◽  
Frail Patients ◽  
Increased Risk

Abstract Background Frailty is common in patients with heart failure (HF) and is associated with increased morbidity and mortality. A better understanding of the causes of hospitalisations and death in frail patients might help to tailor interventional strategies for these at-risk patients. Purpose We studied the cause of death and hospitalisations in ambulatory patients with HF and frailty. Methods We assessed frailty using the clinical frailty scale (CFS) in consecutive HF patients attending a routine follow-up visit. Those with CFS ≥5 were classified as frail. Mortality and hospitalisations were ascertained from medical records (updated systematically using an NHS electronic database), discharge letters, autopsy reports and death certificates. We studied the primary cause of death and hospitalisations within one year of enrolment. Results 467 patients (67% male, median (IQR) age 76 (69–82) years, median (IQR) NT-proBNP 1156 (469–2463) ng/L) were enrolled. 206 (44%) patients were frail. Frail patients were more likely to not receive or receive suboptimal doses of ACEi/ARB and Beta-blockers; while non-frail patients were more likely to be treated with optimal doses. At 1-year follow up, there were 56 deaths and 322 hospitalisations, of which 46 (82%) and 215 (67%) occurred in frail patients. Frailty was associated with an increased risk of all-cause mortality (HR (95% CI): 4.27 (2.60–7.01)) and combined mortality/ hospitalisation (HR (95% CI): 2.85 (2.14–3.80)), all p<0.001. 57% (n=26) of frail patients died of cardiovascular causes (of which 58% were due to HF progression); although deaths due to non-cardiovascular causes (43%, n=20), especially severe infections, were also common (26%, n=12). (Figure 1) The proportion of frail patients who had non-elective hospital admissions within 1 year was more than double that of non-frail patients (46% (n=96) vs 21% (n=54); p<0.001). Compared to non-frail patients, frail patients had more recurrent (≥2) hospitalisations (28% (n=59) vs 9% (n=24); p<0.001) but median (IQR) average length of hospital stay was not significantly different (frail: 6 (4–11) vs non-frail: 6 (2–12) days, p=0.50). A large proportion of hospitalisations (64%, n=137) in frail patients were due to non-cardiovascular causes (of which 34%, 30% and 20% were due to infections, falls and comorbidities respectively). Of cardiovascular hospitalisations (36%, n=78), the majority were due to decompensated HF (67%, n=46). (Figure 1) Conclusion Frailty is common in patients with HF and is associated with an increased risk of mortality and recurrent hospitalisations. A significant proportion suffered non-cardiovascular deaths and hospitalisations. This implies that interventions targeted at HF alone can only have limited impact on outcomes in frail patients. Figure 1 Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: None

scholarly journals Consent for the discontinuation of life-prolonging treatment in cancer patients: a retrospective comparative analysis before and after the enforcement of the Life Extension Medical Decision law

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
YuJin Chung ◽  
JinHo Beom ◽  
JiEun Lee ◽  
Incheol Park ◽  
Junho Cho
Keyword(s):  
Emergency Room ◽  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Average Length ◽  
Length Of Hospital Stay ◽  
Life Extension ◽  
Medical Decision ◽  
Patient Consent ◽  
Before And After ◽  
The Law

Abstract Background The Life Extension Medical Decision law enacted on February 4, 2018 in South Korea was the first to consider the suspension of nonsensical life-prolonging treatment, and its enactment raised big controversy in Korean society. However, there is no study on whether the actual life-prolonging treatment for patients has decreased after enforcing the law. This study aimed to compare the provision of patient consent before and after the enforcement of the law among cancer patients who visited a tertiary university hospital's emergency room to understand the effects of the law on cancer patients' clinical care. Methods This retrospective single cohort study included advanced cancer patients over 19 years of age who visited the emergency room at a tertiary university hospital. The two study periods were as follows: from February 2017 to January 2018 (before) and from May 2018 to April 2019 (after). The primary outcome was the average length of hospital stay. The consent rate for cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR), intubation, continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT), and intensive care unit (ICU) admission were the secondary outcomes. Results The average length of hospital stay decreased after the law was enforced, from 4 days to 2 days (p= 0.001). The rates of direct transfers to secondary and nursing hospitals increased from 8.2% to 21.2% (p=0.001) and from 1.0% to 9.7%, respectively (p<0.001). The rate of provision of consent for admission to the ICU decreased from 6.7% to 2.3% (p=0.032). For CPR and CRRT, the rate of provision of consent decreased from 1.0% to 0.0% and from 13.9% to 8.8%, respectively, but the differences were not significant (p=0.226 and p=0.109, respectively). Conclusion According to previous research, for patients wishing only conservative treatment, the reduction in hospital stays at tertiary hospitals ultimately reduces the physical, emotional, financial burdens and also improves the quality of end-of-life at home or in a hospice facility. In this context, this research ultimately show that the purpose of the LEMD law has been achieved. Further research in several hospitals including those patients who completed the consent after hospitalization is needed to generalize the clinical implication of the LEMD law.

Abstract 18655: Efficacy of Cardiac Computerized Tomographic Angiography in the Evaluation of Patients with Cocaine-Induced Chest Pain: A Pilot Randomized Trial

Circulation ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 130 (suppl_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Richard Peralta ◽  
Andrew Yoon ◽  
Moustapha Atoui ◽  
Karomibal Mejia ◽  
Maryam Afshar ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Chest Pain ◽  
Length Of Stay ◽  
Emergency Room ◽  
Randomized Trial ◽  
Cardiovascular Events ◽  
Hospital Admissions ◽  
Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events ◽  
Emergency Room Visits ◽  
Tomographic Angiography

Background: Cocaine-induced chest pain (CICP) is reported in 40% of patients using cocaine and is associated with frequent emergency room visits and hospital admissions. Hypothesis: Coronary computed tomographic angiography (CCTA) has better outcomes than standard-of-care (SOC) for the evaluation of patients with CICP. Method: CICP patients were randomized to CCTA protocol or SOC. The primary outcome of the study was a composite of recurrent emergency room visits and hospital admissions. Secondary outcomes included length of stay, major adverse cardiovascular events and all-cause mortality. Results: The study population consisted of 202 patients with CICP (CCTA=23 and SOC=179). As compared to SOC, the number of emergency room visits in the CCTA group were lower at 30 days (1.04±0.1 vs. 1.24±0.5, p=0.012) and 1 year (2.43±0.9 vs. 2.61±2.1, p=0.008), but not at 3 years (5.04±3.3 vs. 4.87±1, p=0.112) findings that were independent of CCTA results. Mean admission rates for the CCTA group were slightly but not significantly lower than the SOC group at 30 days (0.91±0.1 vs.1.10±0.2 p=0.438) and 1 year (1.52±0.3 vs. 1.82±0.3 p=0.187), but not at 3 years (3.22±0.6 vs. 2.95±0.5, p=0.111). Hospital length of stay was also lower in CCTA patients than in SOC patients (2.61±0.5 vs. 3.34 ± 0.5 p<0.001). After 3 year follow-up, there was 1 major adverse cardiovascular event in the CCTA group compared to 22 in the SOC group (p=0.024). No patient died in the CCTA while 3 patients died from any cause in the SOC group (p=0.776) after 3 years of follow-up. Conclusion: In this prospective randomized trial, CCTA reduced near and intermediate-term but not long-term rates of emergency room visits and hospitalizations. When compared to SOC, the use of CCTA was associated with a reduction of major adverse cardiovascular events. Larger randomized controlled trials to further assess the efficacy of a CCTA-based strategy for CICP appear warranted.

Impact of Length of Stay on Functional Outcomes of TBI Patients

2005 ◽  
Vol 71 (11) ◽  
pp. 920-930 ◽  
Author(s):  
M.L. Hawkins ◽  
F.D. Lewis ◽  
R.S. Medeiros
Keyword(s):  
Length Of Stay ◽  
Functional Outcomes ◽  
Inpatient Care ◽  
Average Length ◽  
Functional Independence ◽  
Average Length Of Stay ◽  
Group 2 ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Group 1

The purpose of this study was to compare the functional outcomes of two groups of patients with traumatic brain injury (TBI) with attention to the impact of reduced length of stay (LOS) in the trauma center (TC) and rehabilitation hospital (RH). From 1991 to 1994, 55 patients, Group 1, with serious TBI (Abbreviated Injury Scale score ≥3) were admitted to a level 1 TC and subsequently transferred to a comprehensive inpatient RH. These results have been previously published. From 1996 to 2002, 64 similarly injured patients, Group 2, received inpatient care at the same TC and RH. These patients had a marked decrease in length of stay. Functional Independence Measures (FIM) were obtained at admission (Adm), discharge (D/C), and at 1 year follow-up for both groups. The average length of stay at the TC dropped from 36 days in Group 1 to 26 days in Group 2. In addition, the average length of stay at the RH dropped from 46 days (Group 1) to 25 days (Group 2); overall, an average reduction of 31 days of inpatient care. Group 2 had significantly lower FIM scores at the time of RH discharge for self-care, locomotion, and mobility compared to Group 1. At the 1 year follow-up, however, there were no significant differences between Groups 1 and 2 in these FIM scores. FIM scores at 1 year were higher in Group 2 for communication (90% vs 71%) and social cognition (77% vs 49%) compared to Group 1. Over one-fourth of each group returned to work by the 1 year follow-up. Socially disruptive behavior occurred at least weekly in 28 per cent (Group 1) and 23 per cent (Group 2) of patients. The outcome for serious TBI is better than generally perceived. Reduction of inpatient LOS did not adversely affect the ultimate functional outcome. The decreased LOS placed a greater demand on outpatient rehabilitative services as well as a greater burden on the family of the brain-injured patient

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document