scholarly journals Creating the infrastructure for mental health research

2002 ◽  
Vol 26 (11) ◽  
pp. 403-406 ◽  
Author(s):  
Graham Thornicroft ◽  
Jonathan Bindman ◽  
David Goldberg ◽  
Kevin Gournay ◽  
Peter Huxley
Keyword(s):  
Mental Health ◽  
Health Research ◽  
Research Agenda ◽  
Mental Health Research ◽  
National Service ◽  
Department Of Health ◽  
National Service Framework ◽  
Service Framework

The purpose of this paper is to identify the important gaps in research coverage, particularly in areas key to the National Service Framework for Mental Health (NSF-MH) (Department of Health, 1999) and the NHS Plan (Department of Health, 2000), and to translate these gaps into researchable questions, with a view to developing a potential research agenda for consideration by research funders.

scholarly journals National Service Framework for Mental Health

2000 ◽  
Vol 24 (6) ◽  
pp. 203-206 ◽  
Author(s):  
Graham Thornicroft
Keyword(s):  
Mental Health ◽  
National Service ◽  
Department Of Health ◽  
National Service Framework ◽  
Local Flexibility ◽  
Working Age ◽  
And Performance ◽  
The Given ◽  
Clear Statement ◽  
Service Framework

The National Service Framework for Mental Health (NSF–MH) is a strategic blueprint for services for adults of working age for the next 10 years. It is both mandatory, in being a clear statement of what services must seek to achieve in relation to the given standards and performance indicators, and permissive, in that it allows considerable local flexibility to customise the services which need to be provided to fit the framework. This paper summarises the process by which the NSF was created, and its content, which became clear when it was published on 30 September 1999 (Department of Health, 1999).

scholarly journals Government policy and the National Service Framework for Mental Health: modelling and costing services in England

2009 ◽  
Vol 15 (3) ◽  
pp. 230-240 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jed Boardman ◽  
Michael Parsonage
Keyword(s):  
Mental Health ◽  
Mental Healthcare ◽  
National Service ◽  
Department Of Health ◽  
National Service Framework ◽  
Working Age ◽  
Policy Objectives ◽  
Detailed Assessment ◽  
The Government ◽  
Service Framework

SummaryThe National Service Framework for Mental Health (NSF–MH), published by the Department of Health in 1999, set an ambitious 10-year agenda for improving mental healthcare for working-age adults in England, based on seven quality standards covering all major services. The NSF–MH was supported by a series of other policy documents published by the government. This article illustrates a means of modelling the government's policy for adult mental health services to produce figures for the necessary services, staffing and financial resources required to meet the policy objectives. The findings of a report recently published by the Sainsbury Centre for Mental Health, which undertook a detailed assessment of what needs to be done to deliver these standards in terms of service provision, staffing and funding, is summarised and its implications examined.

Alternatives to acute hospital care

2001 ◽  
Vol 11 (4) ◽  
pp. 373-378 ◽  
Author(s):  
H Gentles ◽  
J Potter
Keyword(s):  
Older People ◽  
Acute Hospital ◽  
Intermediate Care ◽  
National Service ◽  
Acute Hospital Care ◽  
Department Of Health ◽  
Health Authorities ◽  
National Service Framework ◽  
Hospital Beds ◽  
Service Framework

The National Bed Inquiry indicated that up to 20% of older people might be inappropriately occupying acute hospital beds and could be discharged if alternative services were available. The report proposed the concept of ‘Intermediate Care’ as a scenario that might contribute to resolving issues around the use of acute hospital beds. The Department of Health (DoH) Circular to Health Authorities and Local Councils with regard to Intermediate Care and the publication of the National Service Framework for Older People have brought intermediate care into mainstream health policy.

Developing mental health services in response to research evidence

2008 ◽  
Vol 17 (1) ◽  
pp. 47-56 ◽  
Author(s):  
Helen Killaspy ◽  
Sonia Johnson ◽  
Michael King ◽  
Paul Bebbington
Keyword(s):  
Mental Health ◽  
Community Treatment ◽  
Local Context ◽  
Department Of Health ◽  
Home Based ◽  
Crisis Resolution Teams ◽  
National Service Framework ◽  
The Us ◽  
Satisfaction With Services ◽  
Service Framework

AbstractOver the last thirty to forty years, psychiatric care in England has relocated from hospital-based settings to community mental health teams (CMHTs) and supported accommodation. Since the 1980s, two forms of intensive home based treatment have evolved in addition to CMHTS, assertive community treatment (ACT) and crisis resolution teams (CRTs). On the basis of evidence for their efficacy in the US and other countries, they have been implemented across England through the Government's National Service Framework for Mental Health. This paper describes this evidence and the first UK studies that were carried out to evaluate these newly implemented services.Methods– Descriptions of the evaluations of ACT and CRTs in the inner London boroughs of Camden and Islington.Results– The implementation of CRTs in North London were associated with reduced use of inpatient services, but the ACT teams were not. Both types of team were associated with greater patient satisfaction with services and the ACTs were better able to engage patients than CMHTs.Conclusions– The authors comment on the implications of the findings for service planners in terms of the difficulties in implementing innovative approaches based on the best available evidence when it originates outside the local context.Declaration of Interest:These studies were funded by Camden and Islington Health Authority, the King's Fund and the Department of Health.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document