scholarly journals Role of the duty psychiatrist

1992 ◽  
Vol 16 (4) ◽  
pp. 218-219 ◽  
Author(s):  
Judith E. Nicholls

Recent changes in psychiatric services have produced a movement away from large hospitals to management within the community. A successful home treatment service with 24-hour cover has been described for severe acute psychiatric illness, though hospital admission was not entirely avoided (Dean et al, 1990). It is difficult to manage violent patients or those who will not comply with medication at home. If relatives are not supportive hospital admission will be required. Although living alone is not a contraindication to treatment at home, those who require constant supervision because they are, for example, suicidal need to be admitted. Concurrent physical problems may also necessitate hospital admission. Any future services must therefore include some in-patient care.

2001 ◽  
Vol 25 (8) ◽  
pp. 310-313 ◽  
Author(s):  
Judy Harrison ◽  
Nooreen Alam ◽  
John Marshall

Aims and MethodHome treatment offers an alternative to in-patient care, but little has been written about the practicalities of running such a service. Using routine information sources, details of referral and outcome are presented for patients assessed by a home treatment service over 6 months.ResultsForty-eight per cent of referrals were not accepted, mainly because of lack of cooperation, risk to self or others or the illness not being acute enough. Referrals from junior doctors and accident & emergency were least likely to be accepted. Seventy-two per cent of patients accepted suffered from schizophrenia, bipolar affective disorder or depression with psychosis, similar to the diagnoses for in-patients. Twenty per cent of patients accepted had to be transferred to in-patient care later.Clinical ImplicationsStaffing levels need to take account of time spent assessing patients. Junior doctors need training in how to use home treatment services appropriately and a wider range of options are needed to manage patients in crisis out of hours. It is possible to target patients with severe mental illness in a home treatment setting, but a significant number will need transfer to inpatient care.


1989 ◽  
Vol 13 (12) ◽  
pp. 667-669 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christine Dean ◽  
Elaine Gadd

Over the last ten years it has been shown that it is possible to treat the majority of patients with acute psychiatric illness in their own homes. Home treatment has been shown to produce a superior outcome to hospital care on measures of symptomatology, subsequent independent living and employment status (Hoult, 1986) self-esteem (Stein & Test, 1980) and may decrease the need for re-admission. Additionally, home treatment decreases the burden felt by the relatives (Pai & Kapur, 1982) and may enable them to cope better with the patient after the acute episode.


2020 ◽  
Vol 32 (S1) ◽  
pp. 62-63
Author(s):  
Sabarigirivasan Muthukrishnan ◽  
Jane Hopkinson ◽  
Kate Hydon ◽  
Lucy Young ◽  
Cristie Howells

Background:Best practice in dementia care is support in the home. Yet, crisis is common and can result in hospital admission. Home-treatment of crisis is an alternative to hospital admission that can have better outcomes and is the preference of people living with dementia.Purpose:To report an investigation of the management of crisis for people with dementia living at home and managed by a Home Treatment Crisis Team.Objective:To identify critical factors for successful resolution of crisis and avoidance of hospital admissionMethods:The research was mixed-methods case study design. It was an in depth investigation of what happens during crisis in people with dementia and how it is managed by a home treatment crisis team to resolution and outcome at six weeks and six months. Methods were observation of the management of crisis in the home setting for 15 people with dementia (max 3 per person, total 41 observations), interviews with people with dementia (n=5), carers (n=13), and 14 professionals (range 1 to 6 per person, total 29), a focus group with professionals (n=9) and extraction from medical records of demographics and medical history.The analysis focused on the identification of key treatments, behaviours, education and context important for home treatment to prevent hospital admission.Findings:The study recruited 15 of the 88 accepted referrals to the service for management of a crisis in a person with dementia.Factors key for crisis resolution were a systems approach with embedded respect for personhood,attention to carer needs independently of the person with dementia,review and monitoring of the effect of medications,awareness and promotion of potential benefits with treatment at home,education of the health and social care workforce in dementia care, local availability of respite and other social care services.The Home Treatment Crisis Team created a ‘Safe Dementia Space’ for the person with dementia in crisis. In the first instance, this was immediate but temporary with on-going assessment and intervention until negotiated permanent support was in place coproduced and agreed by stakeholders to be a sustainable dementia space with acceptable risk of harm to the person with dementia or others. The approach enabled avoidance of hospital admission in more than 80% of referrals.Conclusion:This is the first study to collect data during crisis at home for people with dementia and to investigate process and management. It reveals the Home Treatment Crisis Team created sustainable ‘Safe Dementia Space’ to enable the person with dementia to continue to live in the community during and after crisis, thus avoiding hospital admission. The identified key components of the management approach for crisis resolution are important considerations in the design and delivery of home treatment services for people with dementia in the UK and beyond.


2015 ◽  
Vol 70 (10) ◽  
pp. 1242-1247 ◽  
Author(s):  
Megan K. Beckett ◽  
Marc N. Elliott ◽  
Amelia M. Haviland ◽  
Q Burkhart ◽  
Sarah Gaillot ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 98 (4) ◽  
pp. 238-240
Author(s):  
David A. Ross ◽  
Andrew M. Novick

Patients with psychiatric illness often present a unique challenge to medical students: in contrast to some medical conditions, in which patients may seem to be stricken by a disease, patients with certain psychiatric illnesses may seem complicit with the illness. Questions of free will, choice, and the role of the physician can quickly become overwhelming. This may result in students feeling helpless, disinterested, or even resentful. Here we argue that integrating a modern neuroscience perspective into medical education allows students to conceptualize psychiatric patients in a way that promotes empathy and enhances patient care. Specifically, a strong grasp of neuroscience prevents the future physician from falling into dualistic thinking in which the psychosocial aspects of a patient’s presentation are considered beyond the realm of medicine. The value of incorporating neuroscience into a full, biopsychosocial formulation is demonstrated with the case example of a “difficult patient.”


2020 ◽  
Vol 32 (S1) ◽  
pp. 105-106
Author(s):  
Sabarigirivasan Muthukrishnan ◽  
Kate Hydon ◽  
Lucy Young ◽  
Cristie Howells

Background:Best practice in dementia care is support in the home. Yet, crisis is common and can result in hospital admission. Home-treatment of crisis is an alternative to hospital admission that can have better outcomes and is the preference of people living with dementia.Purpose:To report an investigation of the management of crisis for people with dementia living at home and managed by a Home Treatment Crisis Team.Objective:To identify critical factors for successful resolution of crisis and avoidance of hospital admissionMethods:The research was mixed-methods case study design. It was an in depth investigation of what happens during crisis in people with dementia and how it is managed by a home treatment crisis team to resolution and outcome at six weeks and six months. Methods were observation of the management of crisis in the home setting for 15 people with dementia (max 3 per person, total 41 observations), interviews with people with dementia (n=5), carers (n=13), and 14 professionals (range 1 to 6 per person, total 29), a focus group with professionals (n=9) and extraction from medical records of demographics and medical history.The analysis focused on the identification of key treatments, behaviours, education and context important for home treatment to prevent hospital admission.Findings:The study recruited 15 of the 88 accepted referrals to the service for management of a crisis in a person with dementia.The seven key factors key for crisis resolution were a systems approach with embedded respect for personhood,attention to carer needs independently of the person with dementia,review and monitoring of the effect of medications,awareness and promotion of potential benefits with treatment at home,education of the health and social care workforce in dementia care,local availability of respite and other social care services.a dynamic and flexible working ethos and meaningful MDT working with flattened hierarchyThe Home Treatment Crisis Team created a ‘Safe Dementia Space’ for the person with dementia in crisis. In the first instance, this was immediate but temporary with on-going assessment and intervention until negotiated permanent support was in place coproduced and agreed by stakeholders to be a sustainable dementia space with acceptable risk of harm to the person with dementia or others. The approach enabled avoidance of hospital admission in more than 80% of referrals.Conclusion:This is the first study to collect data during crisis at home for people with dementia and to investigate process and management. It reveals the Home Treatment Crisis Team created sustainable ‘Safe Dementia Space’ to enable the person with dementia to continue to live in the community during and after crisis, thus avoiding hospital admission. The identified key components of the management approach for crisis resolution are important considerations in the design and delivery of home treatment services for people with dementia in the UK and beyond.


1999 ◽  
Vol 23 (6) ◽  
pp. 349-352 ◽  
Author(s):  
Patrick Bracken ◽  
Bruce Cohen

Aims and methodWe describe a new home treatment service established In one sector of the city of Bradford.ResultsThere was a tendency for the patients hospitalised from this sector to have more unstable housing backgrounds. It was found that a higher percentage of patients with diagnoses of serious mental Illness were cared for at home.Clinical implicationsWe argue that even in the presence of home treatment, there Is a continuing need for asylum. However, we make the case that this does not always have to be provided In a medical environment.


1994 ◽  
Vol 18 (7) ◽  
pp. 408-409
Author(s):  
Marcellino Smyth ◽  
Pat Bracken

We offer an account of training experience within an inner city service dedicated to home treatment as an alternative to hospital admission for acute psychiatric illness. The Ladywood service in Birmingham is described and the challenges and opportunities for trainees outlined. A dominantly institutional based training seemed to us deficient, after this exposure. We regarded home treatment very positively and felt that it enriched our professional development in both clinical and conceptual terms.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document