Cognitive Functioning in Parkinson's Disease: in Relation to Prevalence of Dementia and Psychiatric Diagnosis

1986 ◽  
Vol 149 (6) ◽  
pp. 720-725 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. R. Oyebode ◽  
W. A. Barker ◽  
G. Blessed ◽  
D. J. Dick ◽  
P. G. Britton

Forty-three neurologically and psychiatrically assessed patients with idiopathic Parkinson's disease (PD) underwent detailed cognitive assessment. Cognitive deficits typical of senile dementia of Alzheimer's type (SDAT) were found in 7% but the majority showed definite impairments not typical of SDAT. Cognitive impairment was significantly more likely in those with more severe PD symptoms. There was substantial agreement between psychiatric diagnosis and psychological picture of SDAT and some links were found between other diagnostic categories and nature of cognitive functioning. However, cognitive deficits were also found In two-thirds of patients with no psychiatric diagnosis.

2007 ◽  
Vol 23 (2) ◽  
pp. 297-299 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cindy Zadikoff ◽  
Susan H. Fox ◽  
David F. Tang-Wai ◽  
Teri Thomsen ◽  
Rob M.A. de Bie ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Mattia Siciliano ◽  
Lugi Trojano ◽  
Rosa De Micco ◽  
Valeria Sant’Elia ◽  
Alfonso Giordano ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Subjective complaints of cognitive deficits are not necessarily consistent with objective evidence of cognitive impairment in Parkinson’s disease (PD). Here we examined the factors associated with the objective-subjective cognitive discrepancy. Methods We consecutively enrolled 90 non-demented patients with PD who completed the Parkinson’s Disease Cognitive Functional Rating Scale (subjective cognitive measure) and the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA; objective cognitive measure). The patients were classified as “Overestimators”, “Accurate estimators”, and “Underestimators” on the basis of the discrepancy between the objective vs. subjective cognitive measures. To identify the factors distinguishing these groups from each other, we used chi-square tests or one-way analyses of variance, completed by logistic and linear regression analyses. Results Forty-nine patients (54.45%) were classified as “Accurate estimators”, 29 (32.22%) as “Underestimators”, and 12 (13.33%) as “Overestimators”. Relative to the other groups, the “Underestimators” scored higher on the Fatigue Severity Scale (FSS), Beck Depression Inventory (BDI), and Parkinson Anxiety Scale (p < 0.01). Logistic regression confirmed that FSS and BDI scores distinguished the “Underestimators” group from the others (p < 0.05). Linear regression analyses also indicated that FSS and BDI scores positively related to objective-subjective cognitive discrepancy (p < 0.01). “Overestimators” scored lower than other groups on the MoCA’s total score and attention and working memory subscores (p < 0.01). Conclusion In more than 45% of consecutive non-demented patients with PD, we found a ‘mismatch’ between objective and subjective measures of cognitive functioning. Such discrepancy, which was related to the presence of fatigue and depressive symptoms and frontal executive impairments, should be carefully evaluated in clinical setting.


2016 ◽  
Vol 2016 ◽  
pp. 1-6 ◽  
Author(s):  
Emily J. Henderson ◽  
Howard Chu ◽  
Daisy M. Gaunt ◽  
Alan L. Whone ◽  
Yoav Ben-Shlomo ◽  
...  

Background.MoCA is widely used in Parkinson’s disease (PD) to assess cognition. The Test Your Memory (TYM) test is a cognitive screening tool that is self-administered.Objectives.We sought to determine (a) the optimal value of TYM to discriminate between PD patients with and without cognitive deficits on MoCA testing, (b) equivalent MoCA and TYM scores, and (c) interrater reliability in TYM testing.Methods.We assessed the discriminant ability of TYM and the equivalence between TYM and MoCA scores and measured the interrater reliability between three raters.Results.Of the 135 subjects that completed both tests, 55% had cognitive impairment according to MoCA. A MoCA score of 25 was equivalent to a TYM score of 43-44. The area under the receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curve for TYM to differentiate between PD-normal and PD-cognitive impairment was 0.82 (95% CI 0.75 to 0.89). The optimal cutoff to distinguish PD-cognitive impairment from PD-normal was ≤45 (sensitivity 90.5%, specificity 59%) thereby correctly classifying 76.3% of patients with PD-cognitive impairment. Interrater agreement was high (0.97) and TYM was completed in under 7 minutes (interquartile range 5.33 to 8.52 minutes).Conclusions.The TYM test is a useful and less resource intensive screening test for cognitive deficits in PD.


2009 ◽  
Vol 24 (12) ◽  
pp. 1740-1746 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cristina Sanchez-Castaneda ◽  
Ramon Rene ◽  
Blanca Ramirez-Ruiz ◽  
Jaume Campdelacreu ◽  
Jordi Gascon ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document