scholarly journals Evaluating adult forensic staff knowledge of olanzapine long-acting injection post injection syndrome: a service improvement project

BJPsych Open ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 7 (S1) ◽  
pp. S131-S131
Author(s):  
Annalie Clark ◽  
Onagh Boyle ◽  
Suhanthini Farrell ◽  
Catrin Evans

AimsPost injection syndrome (PIS) is a serious complication that can occur after Olanzapine Long Acting Injection (LAI). It can occur without any derangement in physical observations. It is important that patients are monitored appropriately following administration of Olanzapine LAI to ensure that symptoms of PIS are appropriately identified and managed. This project aimed to evaluate the current level of knowledge about PIS in two staff groups within an Adult Forensic Service – in-patient nursing staff and junior doctors and advanced practitioners (APs) providing medical cover to inpatient wards.MethodElectronic surveys evaluating knowledge about the symptoms of PIS, monitoring requirements and management of possible PIS were circulated to inpatient nursing staff, junior doctors and APs working within an Adult Forensic Service in the North West of England.Result1) Nursing staff knowledge – 26 nursing staff completed the survey. 4.5% of nurses correctly identified all symptoms of PIS and 72.7% believed that tachycardia or hypotension occur in PIS. 22.7% of nurses identified the correct management plan if a patient feels unwell following Olanzapine LAI. 40.9% would only request a medical review if physical observations were abnormal. 2) Junior doctor and AP knowledge – 6 doctors and 6 advanced practitioners completed the survey. 17% of doctors and APs correctly identified all symptoms of PIS. 50% believed hypotension or tachycardia were symptoms of PIS. 25% of doctors and APs identified correct management of PIS and 16.7% believed that the patient should be managed on the psychiatric ward unless physical observations became abnormal.ConclusionLevels of knowledge about the symptoms and management of PIS are low within this Adult Forensic Service. Knowledge of PIS and management of suspected PIS needs to be improved in nursing staff, junior doctors and advanced practitioners to ensure correct identification and safe management. In response to these findings, a care plan for monitoring of patients after Olanzapine LAI was developed. This included a structured monitoring proforma for completion post depot administration and instructions for managing suspected PIS. This care plan is kept in the front of the drug chart of all patients prescribed Olanzapine LAI. One-page educational summaries on PIS were written and circulated to nursing staff, junior doctors and APs. Information on Olanzapine LAI use and PIS were included in junior doctor induction materials and on-call handbook, to improve trainee awareness and knowledge.

BJS Open ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Niall Brown ◽  
Joseph Horne ◽  
Andrew Low ◽  
Niall Brown

Abstract Introduction. Templates and checklists have improved patient outcomes in multiple settings.1,2 There are barriers in junior doctors scribing complete entries using blank sheets; patient care might suffer due to incomplete records. This project implemented a ward round pro-forma across three wards of a tertiary hospital containing high risk COVID-19 patients, aiming to improve both documentation rates and subsequent ease in finding pertinent information. Methods. Respiratory consultants determined 11 key parameters that should be documented daily for COVID-19 patients. Baseline objective data collection analysed all high-care ward round entries (n = 15), recording parameters as present or absent. Multidisciplinary team (MDT) opinions were collected via questionnaire. The pro-forma was trialled for two-weeks; repeated subjective and objective analysis was performed. All (n = 12) inpatient notes on the COVID-19 high-care ward were analysed. Results/Discussion. Pro-forma compliance was 100%. The mean number of key parameters documented per ward round entry increased by 80%, from 5 to 9. Eleven (100%) of the key parameters showed increased completion rates (fig.1). Junior doctor confidence increased 1-Likert point: ‘average’ to ‘confident’ (fig.2). 97% of respondents (n = 31) reported the pro forma saved time. Information finding and swab tracking both increased by 1-Likert point: ‘average’ to ‘easy’ (fig.2). From a medico-legal perspective, documentation of basic information (date, time) improved by 13%. This project shows not only a 60% increase in ceiling of care documentation, but also improved ease in accessing such information. Conclusion. This pro-forma is a simple and acceptable intervention to improve documentation rates and information accessibility, giving junior doctors more confidence.


2021 ◽  
Vol 108 (Supplement_6) ◽  
Author(s):  
D S Sahni ◽  
G McCabe ◽  
R P Stevenson

Abstract Aim Clinical governance states that patients should have a named Consultant during their in-patient stay. In our institution, every bed has a whiteboard above it, which mentions the name of the patient and the responsible Consultant. This should correspond with the electronic system, TrakCare. Ouraim was to audit and look into the accuracy of this practice, in order to improve the efficacy of ward-rounds and hence improve patient care and safety. Method Data was collected for general surgery and urology receiving wards over 3 consecutive days and was matched to the data available on the electronic system, TrakCare. Intervention was made in the form of verbal and written communication with the nursing staff and junior doctors. Effect of intervention was assessed 2 weeks later. Results n = 38 bed-boards were assessed. The first cycle of the audit demonstrated that 7 (18.4%) had either incorrect or no entries. The detailed analysis revealed that of these, 2 had no consultant names whereas 5 were incorrect. The second cycle demonstrated a good improvement with only 1(2.6%) bed-boards having incorrect or no names. The third cycle demonstrated sustainable impact with only 1 (2.6%) missing consultant’s name. Conclusions Ward-rounds have been an age-old practice to review patients and are vital to formulate a care plan for patients, particularly in acute settings. It is also important for the patient to know who is providing their care. Wrong or missing entries could compromise patient care and has implications in patient follow up and chasing results. A simple intervention by the nursing and medical staff can improve the quality of care.


2021 ◽  
Vol 108 (Supplement_6) ◽  
Author(s):  
M Caine ◽  
A Bannon ◽  
Z Moinuddin

Abstract Introduction Wound closure and dressing choice is a decision largely impacted by factors including surgeon preference and unit standard. This service improvement project aimed to assess the difference between skin clips, the current unit standard, and a tissue adhesive (Liquiband) after renal transplantation. Method Data was collected retrospectively from July 2020 onwards. Outcome measures included the incidence of surgical site infections (SSI), cost, and nursing preference. Forty transplanted patients were selected, comprising the first twenty patients with skin clips and the first twenty patients with tissue adhesive. Medical notes and GP records were reviewed for any documented SSI or antibiotic prescription within six weeks of transplantation. A cost analysis was performed. Additionally, an online survey was distributed to nursing staff using Likert scales in response to a series of statements about wound care. Results There were no documented SSIs in either group, and no patients commenced antibiotics for a wound infection. On average, there was a 45% cost saving when using tissue adhesive compared to skin clips and additional wound dressings. 100% of nurses strongly agreed or agreed that wound care was easier with tissue adhesive, and 93% agreed that considerably more time is spent on wound care for patients with skin clips. Conclusions These results suggest that tissue adhesive offers comparable incidence of SSIs compared with skin clips. Furthermore, tissue adhesive is cheaper, more time-efficient, and preferred by nursing staff in post-operative wound care.


2021 ◽  
Vol 108 (Supplement_6) ◽  
Author(s):  
J Wallace ◽  
J McCord ◽  
B Roberts ◽  
S Browning

Abstract Aim Swansea Bay University Health Board have a caseload of 37 surgical voice restoration (SVR) laryngectomies. These patients are excellently managed during working hours, by a SALT-led service. Concerns were raised regarding the quality of out of hours management: the aim of this project was to identify and address the factors contributing to the difference in care received. Method A questionnaire was sent to current junior doctors to assess knowledge and confidence when managing SVR patients. Phone interviews were conducted with SVR patients to discuss the issues from a patient’s perspective. The junior doctor team and SALT team liaised to identify contributing logistical issues. Results The junior doctor survey indicated both experience and confidence were low, including amongst senior trainees. 58.3% were unfamiliar with equipment used to change a speech valve. Patient interviews revealed several issues, such as delays to treatment and unnecessary admissions. Logistical concerns included inability to access equipment out of hours and an absence of departmental guidelines. Conclusions This project demonstrates a collaborative approach between junior doctors and SALT, to improve the quality of care for a sub-set of patients with highly specialised needs. We identified the contributing factors for the disparity in services and tailored interventions to provide the junior doctors responsible for out of hours care, with the knowledge and skills to provide a better standard of care.


2021 ◽  
Vol 108 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
S Bhattacharya ◽  
J Jegadeeson ◽  
J Ramsingh ◽  
P Truran

Abstract Introduction Post-operative haemorrhage is a rare but potentially life-threatening complication of thyroid surgery and occurs in 1 in 100 patients. Our aim was to assess current levels of awareness of post-operative haemorrhage in the surgical department and to improve confidence in managing this. Method Questionnaires with a combination of clinical questions were distributed amongst nurses, foundation doctors, senior house officers and registrars in the surgical department. Results There was a clear gap in awareness in all grades. The British Association of Endocrine and Thyroid surgeons (BAETS) have guidance on the management of these patients and in particular the acronym SCOOP (Steristrips removed, Cut subcuticular sutures, Open skin wound, Open strap muscles, Pack wound). 18/24 of participants had not heard of the SCOOP protocol. Most nurses (6/12) all junior doctors (8/8) showed lack of confidence in managing patients with suspected bleeding. Conclusions An informative poster was created for relevant clinical areas as per the BAETS recommendation. These posters outlined the steps in the SCOOP acronymas well as the main clinical signs of haemorrhage. BAETS recommend that all first responders, including nursing staff, junior doctors and the crash team should be aware of the SCOOP protocol. Simulation training sessions are in progress for these members of staff.


2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. e001142
Author(s):  
Richard Thomas Richmond ◽  
Isobel Joy McFadzean ◽  
Pramodh Vallabhaneni

BackgroundDischarge summaries need to be completed in a timely manner, to improve communication between primary and secondary care, and evidence suggests that delays in discharge summary completion can lead to patient harm.Following a hospital health and safety review due to the sheer backlog of notes in the doctor’s room and wards, urgent action had to be undertaken to improve the discharge summary completion process at our hospital’s paediatric assessment unit. It was felt that the process would best be carried out within a quality improvement (QI) project.MethodsKotter’s ‘eight-step model for change’ was implemented in this QI project with the aim to clear the existing backlog of pending discharge summaries and improve the timeliness of discharge summary completion from the hospital’s paediatric assessment unit. A minimum target of 10% improvement in the completion rate of discharge summaries was set as the primary goal of the project.ResultsFollowing the implementation of the QI processes, we were able to clear the backlog of discharge summaries within 9 months. We improved completion within 24 hours, from <10% to 84%, within 2 months. The success of our project lies in the sustainability of the change process; to date we have consistently achieved the target completion rates since the inception of the project. As a result of the project, we were able to modify the junior doctor rota to remove discharge summary duty slots and bolster workforce on the shop floor. This is still evident in November 2020, with consistently improved discharge summary rates.ConclusionQI projects when conducted successfully can be used to improve patient care, as well as reduce administrative burden on junior doctors. Our QI project is an example of how Kotter’s eight-step model for change can be applied to clinical practice.


2016 ◽  
Vol 11 (3) ◽  
pp. 144-155
Author(s):  
Kassia Lowe ◽  
Fiona Hynes

Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to address and understand recruitment difficulties into psychiatry; however, to date there is no published research with respect to forensic psychiatry. Forensic psychiatry has always been considered to be a popular specialty amongst junior doctors and therefore the recent trend in local unfilled core training (CT) (junior doctor) posts and national reduced competition ratios for higher specialist training has triggered concern. The impact vacant CT posts within the Forensic Service may have on the future workforce must be considered. Further understanding of this trend is required. Design/methodology/approach – A short statement-style survey addressing attitudes and opinions with respect to the field of forensic psychiatry was devised and distributed to all West Midlands core psychiatry trainees who attended post-graduate teaching (November 2014). Findings – Response rate was 64 per cent. In total, 52 per cent of participants expressed an interest in the specialty, but only 13 per cent wished to pursue a career in forensic psychiatry. In total, 68 per cent of responses deemed forensic psychiatry to be a demanding speciality, with over 50 per cent perceiving forensic patients as difficult to work with. There were high rates of uncertain responses with respect to specialty work life. In total, 78 per cent of responses considered experience of the specialty to be useful. Research limitations/implications – The method chosen to distribute the survey maximised response rate, but may have introduced a Hawthorne effect, as well as response bias, with the visual presence of the researcher. Participants were limited to those who attended teaching on the specified day. This could potentially skew results with an absence of opinions of non-attenders. It may be that characteristics and therefore attitudes and opinions of these two groups are different. A further limitation of the study is that opinions explored are limited to statements included within the survey. Practical implications – The current views may represent stigma, negative media portrayal and misinformed opinions. Action must be taken to increase understanding, interest and experience. Increased exposure to the specialty needs to occur. This could occur as early as high school, using case-study exercises and career sessions. Teaching sessions, summer school placements and elective opportunities should be made available for medical students. At post-graduate level, taster days as well as earlier access to rotations may be a way forward. Originality/value – Although entry into Forensic Higher Training remains comparatively competitive, the potential impact of vacant junior doctor (CT) posts within the speciality is concerning. This is likely to negatively influence recruitment into higher training, which may ultimately lead to decreased numbers of qualified forensic psychiatrists. Specialised care for such a risky and challenging patient group could thus be significantly compromised in the near future. Hence, it is vital to understand the current trend in order to act pre-emptively and address the underlying problems. To date no such research has been conducted.


2014 ◽  
Vol 27 (4) ◽  
pp. 316-329 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jason Micallef ◽  
Brodene Straw

Purpose – This paper aims to provide an overview of the design and initial outcomes of a leadership and service improvement program for junior medical staff. Design/methodology/approach – This paper describes the rationale, initial set-up, structure, program outcomes and future directions of the Medical Service Improvement Program for junior doctors. This program is a recent initiative of the Western Australian public healthcare system. Findings – The Medical Service Improvement Program illustrates a successful approach to developing junior doctors to lead improvements in health service delivery. The program has resulted in tangible personal outcomes for participants, in addition to important organisational outcomes. Practical implications – This paper provides an evidence-based structured approach to developing the leadership abilities of junior medical staff. It provides practical information on the design of the leadership program that aligns the participant learning outcomes to postgraduate medical competencies. The program has demonstrated clear service outcomes, confirming that junior medical staff is both capable and committed to leading service improvement and reform. Originality/value – This paper provides clear evidence for the benefits of providing dedicated non-clinical time for junior medical staff to lead quality and improvement initiatives. This case study will assist hospital administrators, postgraduate education units and those involved in designing and administering clinical leadership development programs.


2021 ◽  
Vol 108 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
A Gowda ◽  
Z Chia ◽  
T Fonseka ◽  
K Smith ◽  
S Williams

Abstract Introduction Every day in our surgical department; prior to our quality improvement project, Junior Doctors spent on average 3.26 clinical hours maintaining 5 surgical inpatient lists of different specialities with accessibility of lists rated as “neutral” based on a 5-point scale from difficult to easy. Our hospital previously had lists stored locally on designated computers causing recurrent difficulties in accessing and editing these lists. Method We used surveys sent to clinicians to collect data. Cycle 1: Surgical Assessment Units list on Microsoft Teams Cycle 2: Addition of surgical specialities and wards lists onto Microsoft Teams. Cycle 3 (current): expand the use of Microsoft Teams to other specialities. Results Utilising technology led to a 25% reduction in time spent on maintaining inpatient lists, to 2.46 hours a day, and an improvement in the accessibility of lists to “easy”. Across a year, this saves over 220 hours clinician hours which can be used towards patient care and training. Furthermore, use of Microsoft Teams has improved communication and patient care, in the form of virtual regional Multi-Disciplinary Team meetings and research projects. Conclusions Microsoft Teams is currently free to all NHS organisations in England so there is potential for these efficiency savings to be replicated nationwide.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document