scholarly journals A case of pervasive refusal syndrome related to COVID19

BJPsych Open ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 7 (S1) ◽  
pp. S114-S114
Author(s):  
Nurul Aqma Mohd Kamil ◽  
Sharon Ryan

ObjectiveTo highlight the importance of appropriate diagnosis and management of severe mental illness in children. Awareness of rare diagnoses such as this will reduce the delay to treatment. A challenge in Ireland is accessing psychiatric inpatient treatment for very young children, with specialist units in Ireland designed to better cater for young people aged 12+.Case reportMichael (not his real name), age 10, was always described as a happy, calm child. He enjoyed school and loved playing outdoors. He had been progressing well with his life and neither his parents nor school had any concerns for him. Following the COVID-19 pandemic and school closures, Michael began to became more conscious of daily hygiene safety advice. However, things escalated to a very difficult level. Initially, he manifested extreme levels of anxiety with heightened levels of distress. He ran away from open doors or windows for fear he would catch the virus, insisted on changing his clothes several times per day, would become distressed if anyone touched him accidentally while he was outside and could spend hours afterwards crying and screaming.In June 2020 he showed profound refusal to engage in basic care tasks and a dramatic social withdrawal, and ultimately required admission to hospital. He refused to eat and drink, stopped washing and toileting himself, lay in bed with the covers over this head, became non-verbal and refused to engage with any conversation or games. He showed prolonged periods of screaming. Ultimately this reached a level requiring TPN and PEG feeding and a low stimulation environment. Diagnosis of pervasive refusal disorder, secondary to severe COVID-19 related anxiety was made.DiscussionPervasive refusal disorder is a rare and potentially life threatening condition in children. It is described as a profound psychological response to uncontrollable events such as grief, abuse, parental conflict and migration. In this case, it was the threat of the global pandemic. Through treatment in low stimulation environments, with consistent communication and rehabilitation and medication, followed by individual and family therapies when patients are more able, patients show a slow, but generally complete recovery. Happily for Michael, he has now recovered and returned home to his family, where he has returned to all his previous activities.ConclusionMichael and his parents have kindly agreed to allow us to tell his story, in the hope of teaching current and future psychiatrists about this rare condition. We send them our thanks and appreciation.

Author(s):  
Tilman Wetterling ◽  
Klaus Junghanns

Abstract. Aim: This study investigates the characteristics of older patients with substance abuse disorders admitted to a psychiatric department serving about 250.000 inhabitants. Methods: The clinical diagnoses were made according to ICD-10. The data of the patients with substance abuse were compared to a matched sample of psychiatric inpatients without substance abuse as well as to a group of former substance abusers with long-term abstinence. Results: 19.3 % of the 941 patients aged > 65 years showed current substance abuse, 9.4 % consumed alcohol, 7.9 % took benzodiazepines or z-drugs (zolpidem and zopiclone), and 7.0 % smoked tobacco. Multiple substance abuse was rather common (30.8 %). About 85 % of the substance abusers had psychiatric comorbidity, and about 30 % showed severe withdrawal symptoms. As with the rest of the patients, somatic multimorbidity was present in about 70 % of the substance abusers. Remarkable was the lower rate of dementia in current substance abusers. Conclusion: These results underscore that substance abuse is still a challenge in the psychiatric inpatient treatment of older people.


BMJ Open ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (3) ◽  
pp. e046177
Author(s):  
Julie Polisena ◽  
Maria Ospina ◽  
Omolara Sanni ◽  
Brittany Matenchuk ◽  
Rachel Livergant ◽  
...  

ObjectiveThe main objectives of this study were to synthesise and compare pandemic preparedness strategies issued by the federal and provincial/territorial (P/T) governments in Canada and to assess whether COVID-19 public health (PH) measures were tailored towards priority populations, as defined by relevant social determinants of health.MethodsThis scoping review searched federal and P/T websites on daily COVID-19 pandemic preparedness strategies between 30 January and 30 April 2020. The PROGRESS-Plus equity-lens framework was used to define priority populations. All definitions, policies and guidelines of PH strategies implemented by the federal and P/T governments to reduce risk of SARS-CoV-2 transmission were included. PH measures were classified using a modified Public Health Agency of Canada Framework for Canadian Pandemic Influenza Preparedness.ResultsA total of 722 COVID-19 PH measures were issued during the study period. Of these, home quarantine (voluntary) (n=13.0%; 94/722) and retail/commerce restrictions (10.9%; n=79/722) were the most common measures introduced. Many of the PH orders, including physical distancing, cancellation of mass gatherings, school closures or retail/commerce restrictions began to be introduced after 11 March 2020. Lifting of some of the PH orders in phases to reopen the economy began in April 2020 (6.5%; n=47/722). The majority (68%, n=491/722) of COVID-19 PH announcements were deemed mandatory, while 32% (n=231/722) were recommendations. Several PH measures (28.0%, n=202/722) targeted a variety of groups at risk of socially produced health inequalities, such as age, religion, occupation and migration status.ConclusionsMost PH measures centred on limiting contact between people who were not from the same household. PH measures were evolutionary in nature, reflecting new evidence that emerged throughout the pandemic. Although ~30% of all implemented COVID-19 PH measures were tailored towards priority groups, there were still unintended consequences on these populations.


2020 ◽  
Vol 130 ◽  
pp. 201-206
Author(s):  
Celline Cole ◽  
Angelika Vandamme ◽  
Felix Bermpohl ◽  
Klara Czernin ◽  
Alexandre Wullschleger ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 25 (1) ◽  
pp. 227-241 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thinh Ngo ◽  
Matthew Hodes

This study reviews the current evidence in pervasive refusal syndrome (PRS) in asylum-seeking children. Refugees can experience a variety of traumas throughout the process of migration. Children can be exposed to multiple traumas such as experienced or witnessed physical or sexual violence, loss and bereavement, parental separation and the threat of persecution and/or kidnapping. The third stage of the migration journey can add further stress; children and families may experience multiple rejections of asylum application effectively living in limbo with the constant threat of deportation. High rates of mental health disorder are well documented in young asylum seekers, particularly depression, anxiety and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). PRS is less frequently described but nonetheless a severe and life-threatening condition affecting young asylum seekers. Traumatisation, cultural factors and hostile asylum processes are specific moderating factors seen in asylum-seeking children. Asylum-seeking children normally make a full recovery from PRS. This study suggests a link between prolonged asylum processes and hostile foreign policy in developing and maintaining illness; similar cases are now being reported in other countries with hostile foreign policies. These findings are therefore relevant to clinicians and politicians working with this vulnerable group.


2020 ◽  
Vol 74 (8) ◽  
pp. 577-584
Author(s):  
Ann Færden ◽  
Brita Bølgen ◽  
Lars Løvhaug ◽  
Christian Thoresen ◽  
Ingrid Dieset

2009 ◽  
Vol 24 (S1) ◽  
pp. 1-1
Author(s):  
N. Bilanakis ◽  
V. Peritogiannis

Background and aim:Coercive physical measures, such as seclusion and restraint are sometimes used in psychiatric inpatient treatment for the management of severely disturbed behaviour of patients. As part of a larger study on the use of restraint and seclusion in a psychiatric unit of a general hospital in Greece we aimed to record the patients’ and their relatives’ attitudes on coercive measures.Methods:Data regarding patients’ and family accounts on coercive measures were collected retrospectively with chart review of all patients who had been admitted to the psychiatric ward of the University Hospital of Ioannina over a six-month period and had been subjected to restraint or seclusion. During hospitalization and after the periods of restraint or seclusion, patients and relatives had been asked whether they considered coercion as justified or not. Patients had been also asked whether they perceived this experience as harmful.Results:Thirty one cases of restraint and seclusion from a total of 282 admissions were recorded during the study period. In 6 cases the patients refused to answer or did not have the decision making capacity. Twenty out of 25 (80%) patients considered their coercion to be unjustified and perceived it as traumatic experience. Twenty-five out of 28 (89.3%) relatives considered justified the decision to restrain or seclude the patient.Conclusions:Patients and their families have different accounts on coercion, but more research is needed. It is important for care planning to record the patients’ and families’ views and integrate them in mental health policy making.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document