scholarly journals Assessment and treatment of individuals at high risk for psychosis

2019 ◽  
Vol 25 (3) ◽  
pp. 177-184 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christina Andreou ◽  
Barbara Bailey ◽  
Stefan Borgwardt

SUMMARYEarly detection and specialised early intervention for people at high risk for psychotic disorders have received growing attention in the past few decades, with the aim of delaying or preventing the outbreak of explicit psychotic symptoms and improving functional outcomes. This article summarises criteria for a diagnosis of high psychosis risk, the implications for such a diagnosis and recommendations for treatment.LEARNING OBJECTIVESAfter reading this article you will be able to: •recognise signs and symptoms indicating increased psychosis risk•understand uses and limitations of screening for high psychosis risk, and interpretation of results•recognise evidence-based treatment options for patients at clinical high risk for psychosis.DECLARATION OF INTERESTC.A. has received non-financial support from Sunovion and Lundbeck in the past 36 months.

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Katarzyna Rek-Owodziń ◽  
Ernest Tyburski ◽  
Katarzyna Waszczuk ◽  
Jerzy Samochowiec ◽  
Monika Mak

In recent decades, clinicians have developed the construct of ultra-high risk (UHR) for psychosis to characterize the prodromal phase of psychosis or classify people with weakly expressed psychotic symptoms. In this conceptual analysis, we have gathered up-to-date data about the clinical picture of neurocognition and social cognition in people at UHR for psychosis. We also discuss treatment options. A well-chosen therapeutic approach can help to deal with difficulties and delay or even prevent the development of full-blown psychotic disorders in the UHR group. Despite much evidence supporting the benefits of therapy, early interventions are still not as widely used as they should be. Thus, a better understanding of the UHR state is very important for all healthcare workers.


2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
pp. 23-25 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrew Chunkil Park ◽  
Leigh Goodrich ◽  
Bobak Hedayati ◽  
Ralph Albert ◽  
Kyle Dornhofer ◽  
...  

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to illustrate delirium as a possible consequence of the application of symptom-triggered therapy for alcohol withdrawal and to explore alternative treatment modalities. In the management of alcohol withdrawal syndrome, symptom-triggered therapy directs nursing staff to regularly assess patients using standardized instruments, such as the Clinical Institute for Withdrawal Assessment of Alcohol, Revised (CIWA-Ar), and administer benzodiazepines at symptom severity thresholds. Symptom-triggered therapy has been shown to lower total benzodiazepine dosage and treatment duration relative to fixed dosage tapers (Daeppen et al., 2002). However, CIWA-Ar has important limitations. Because of its reliance on patient reporting, it is inappropriate for nonverbal patients, non-English speakers (in the absence of readily available translators) and patients in confusional states including delirium and psychosis. Importantly, it also relies on the appropriate selection of patients and considering alternate etiologies for signs and symptoms also associated with alcohol withdrawal. Design/methodology/approach The authors report a case of a 47-year-old male admitted for cardiac arrest because of benzodiazepine and alcohol overdose who developed worsening delirium on CIWA-Ar protocol. Findings While symptom-triggered therapy through instruments such as the CIWA-Ar protocol has shown to lower total benzodiazepine dosage and treatment duration in patients in alcohol withdrawal, over-reliance on such tools may also lead providers to overlook other causes of delirium. Originality/value This case illustrates the necessity for providers to consider using other available assessment and treatment options including objective alcohol withdrawal scales, fixed benzodiazepine dosage tapers and even antiepileptic medications in select patients.


2008 ◽  
Vol 193 (5) ◽  
pp. 378-382 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ian Kelleher ◽  
Michelle Harley ◽  
Fionnuala Lynch ◽  
Louise Arseneault ◽  
Carol Fitzpatrick ◽  
...  

BackgroundChildren and adolescents who report psychotic symptoms appear to be at increased risk for psychotic disorders in adulthood – a putative ‘symptomatic’ high-risk group. However, little research has investigated whether those in this high-risk population have increased rates of exposure to traumatic events in childhood, as seen in patients who have a psychotic illness.AimsTo examine whether adolescents with psychotic symptoms have an increased rate of traumatic experiences.MethodPsychiatric interviews were carried out with 211 adolescents aged between 12 and 15 years and their parents as part of a population-based study. The interview enquired about a number of early traumatic events including physical and sexual abuse, exposure to domestic violence and bullying.ResultsFourteen adolescents (6.6% of those interviewed) reported experiencing at least one psychotic symptom. Adolescents who reported psychotic symptoms were significantly more likely to have been physically abused in childhood, to have been exposed to domestic violence and to be identified as a bully/victim (that is, both a perpetrator and victim of bullying) than those who did not report such symptoms. These findings were not confounded by comorbid psychiatric illness or family history of psychiatric history.ConclusionsOur findings suggest that childhood trauma may increase the risk of psychotic experiences. The characteristics of bully/victims deserve further study.


2020 ◽  
Vol 46 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S169-S170
Author(s):  
Victoria Patterson ◽  
Alissa Pencer ◽  
Philip Tibbo

Abstract Background Research has found that adversity and substance use individually influence the onset of psychosis and its clinical outcomes, though there has been little examination of a potential three-way interaction. An estimated 30–75% of individuals with psychosis have experienced at least one adverse event that predates their psychotic symptoms, and substance misuse is estimated to exceed 55% in individuals with psychosis. The current systematic review is the first attempt to review the temporal ordering of adversity, psychosis, and substance misuse, as well as examining the effect of type (e.g., type of adversity, type of substance) on the association between these variables. Methods Following PRISMA guidelines, a comprehensive search strategy and review of studies against strict inclusion and exclusion criteria was completed. Studies published between 2000 and 2020 were included from PsycINFO, PubMed, CINAHL, EMBASE, Scopus, Web of Science, and the grey literature. Inclusion criteria, all of which must be met within a single study, included a diagnosed psychotic disorder, experiencing at least one adverse event, and current or past problematic substance use (i.e., substance misuse). High-risk and prodromal studies were excluded. We used search term combinations such as (schizophrenia OR schizoaffective) AND (adversity or trauma OR abuse) AND (“substance abuse” OR cannabis OR cocaine). Results Our initial search found 7,183 papers examining psychotic disorders, substance misuse, and adversity. Preliminary results for included studies indicate that 13 studies met criteria for inclusion. Across studies, the prevalence of experiencing at least one adverse event ranged from 24.8 to 100%, with significant variation in rates among studies due to variance in definitions of adversity, instruments used, and types of adverse events assessed. It is noteworthy that people with a psychotic disorder and a substance use disorder experienced more adverse events compared to people with a psychotic disorder and no substance use disorder. Moreover, individuals with a psychotic disorder, substance misuse, and a history of adversity are more likely to experience reduced functional outcomes, lower rates of remission of psychotic symptoms, and increased post-traumatic stress symptoms and diagnoses. Across studies, adversity appeared to precede substance misuse, which preceded psychotic disorder onset. Discussion Our results suggest that individuals affected by psychotic disorders, substance misuse, and a history of adversity fare worse than those without a history of adversity, even once enrolled in a treatment program for psychosis. Moreover, adversity appeared to precede both substance misuse and psychotic disorders, however, the role of additional adverse events within this relationship was not well-studied and should be examined in the future. Findings suggest that assessing for substance use and a history of adversity within psychosis treatment programs is a critical first step in the recovery for people affected by these psychiatric comorbidities and specific treatment options addressing these factors would be critical for recovery. Moreover, treatment options should be capable of targeting maintenance mechanisms (e.g., avoidance, hopelessness) shared by all three constructs to provide an integrated treatment approach.


2020 ◽  
Vol 2020 ◽  
pp. 1-7
Author(s):  
Liyew Agenagnew ◽  
Elias Tesfaye ◽  
Selamawit Alemayehu ◽  
Mathewos Masane ◽  
Tilahun Bete ◽  
...  

Introduction. The case after exposure to intense traumatic events manifests signs and symptoms of dissociative amnesia with a dissociative fugue and schizophrenia. The psychotic symptoms we found, in this case, were very complicated and mimicking primary psychotic disorders. Therefore, this might be a good forum for the scientific world to learn from this case report, how psychotic disorders coexist with dissociative disorders, since the literatures in this area are too rare. Main Symptoms and/or Important Clinical Findings. This case report focuses on the case of dissociative amnesia with dissociative fugue and psychosis in a 25-year-old Ethiopian female who lost her husband and three children at the same time during the nearby ethnic conflict. Associated with amnesia, she lost entire autobiographical information, and she also had psychotic symptoms like delusions and auditory hallucination which is related to the traumatic event she faced. The Main Diagnoses, Therapeutic Interventions, and Outcomes. The diagnosis of dissociative amnesia with a dissociative fugue comorbid with schizophrenia was made, and both pharmacological and psychological interventions were given to the patient. After the intervention, the patient had a slight improvement regarding psychotic symptoms but her memory problem was not restored. Conclusions. The observation in this case report brings to the fore that individuals with dissociative amnesia with dissociative fugue can have psychotic symptoms, and it takes a longer time to recover from memory disturbances.


2011 ◽  
Vol 26 (S2) ◽  
pp. 1163-1163
Author(s):  
M.C. Campos Mangas ◽  
M.A. Ruiz Feliu

IntroductionThis program aims to assist young people aged 16 to 35 years at risk for or who have a severe mental disorder, a psychosis both affected and unaffected, according to the principles of early intervention and assertive community treatment.ObjectivesAssisting young people with psychosis in order to achieve symptomatic and functional recovery, return to provide standardized environment and prevent deterioration.MethodsInitial assessment is made and individualized plan of work.Inclusion criteria1.Diagnosis: substance-induced psychotic disorder, schizophrenia and other psychotic disorders, bipolar disorder and mood disorders with psychotic symptoms2.age: 16–35 years3.Informed consentEvaluation ToolsPANSS, SCIP, CDS, CGI-S, PAS, CAN, EU, SFS, GAF, WHOQUOL-BREF, IEQ-EU, UKU, HoNOS, CGI-IP, CGI-ICResultsThe sample consisted of 22 patients. 45.5% men and 54.5% women. Mean age 24 (SD = 4.74). Diagnosis: schizophrenia 54.5%, 27.3% acute psychotic disorder, 4.5% and 13.6% schizoaffective disorder manic episode with psychotic symptoms. Clinical stage at the beginning of the program: 45.5% stage 2, 4.5% stage 3a; 22.7% stage 3b, 3c stage 22.7% and 4.5% stage 4.ConclusionsIt is necessary to implement such programs to establish the treatment as soon as possible to the onset of the disease and improve prognosis.


Author(s):  
Jim van Os ◽  
Annette Schaub ◽  
William T Carpenter

Abstract There has been a major drive in research trying to understand the onset of psychosis. Clinical-high risk (CHR) studies focus on opportunistic help-seeking samples with non-psychotic disorders and a degree of psychosis admixture of variable outcome, but it is unlikely that these represent the population incidence of psychotic disorders. Longitudinal cohort studies of representative samples in the general population have focused on development and outcome of attenuated psychotic symptoms, but typically have low power to detect transition to clinical psychotic disorder. In this issue of Schizophrenia Bulletin, Cupo and colleagues resurrect a time-honored method to examine psychosis onset: the epidemiological follow-back study, modernizing it to fit the research framework of the early intervention era. The authors set out to investigate the hypothesis that psychotic disorder represents the poorest outcome fraction of initially non-psychotic, common mental disorders and present compelling findings, unifying previous opportunistic CHR and representative cohort-based work.


Author(s):  
Janis L. Cutler

This chapter presents the elements of a psychiatric assessment. After hearing the patient’s chief complaint, the physician elicits the patient’s history of the present illness (a chronological, systematic description of the patient’s signs and symptoms) past psychiatric history, medical history, psychosocial history, family history, and review of systems. The physician also obtains the patient’s mental status examination, which is an objective description of his or her current mental state. Integration of the patient’s history and objective findings results in a comprehensive descriptive and diagnostic impression, which summarizes patterns of data, predicts prognosis, and suggests appropriate treatment options. Use of a biopsychosocial and cultural perspective produces a psychiatric assessment that considers the patient’s strengths and vulnerabilities in relation to his or her cultural group.


2019 ◽  
Vol 25 (05) ◽  
pp. 309-320
Author(s):  
Karen Romain ◽  
Alexandra Eriksson ◽  
Richard Onyon ◽  
Manoj Kumar

SUMMARYCurrent understanding of psychosis development is relevant to patients' clinical outcomes in mental health services as a whole, given that psychotic symptoms can be a feature of many different diagnoses at different stages of life. Understanding the risk factors helps clinicians to contemplate primary, secondary and tertiary preventive strategies that it may be possible to implement. In this second article of a three-part series, the psychosis risk timeline is again considered, here focusing on risk factors more likely to be encountered during later childhood, adolescence and adulthood. These include environmental factors, substance misuse, and social and psychopathological aspects.LEARNING OBJECTIVES:After reading this article you will be able to: •understanding the range of risk factors for development of psychotic symptoms in young people and adults•understand in particular the association between trauma/abuse and subsequent psychosis•appreciate current evidence for the nature and strength of the link between substance misuse and psychosis.DECLARATION OF INTEREST:None.


2005 ◽  
Vol 39 (6) ◽  
pp. 460-466 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yang Yun ◽  
Lisa J. Phillips ◽  
Sue Cotton ◽  
Alison R. Yung ◽  
Shona M. Francey ◽  
...  

Objective: An association between birth and pregnancy complications and the later development of schizophrenia has been described for decades and obstetric complications (OCs) have been proposed as a vulnerability marker for psychosis in line with the neurodevelopmental hypothesis of psychotic disorders. Previous studies of OCs have focused on established schizophrenia. In this study, the association between OCs and the development of psychotic disorder was studied in a group of 74 young people identified as being at very high risk for the first onset of psychosis. Method: The ‘ultra’ high risk (UHR) cohort was identified by the presence of subthreshold psychotic symptoms, or a combination of first-degree relative with a psychotic disorder and recent functional decline. Thirty-eight per cent of the cohort developed an acute psychotic episode over the 12-month period after recruitment. As a component of a larger research study, the level of OCs experienced by the UHR cohort was assessed at intake. Results: Obstetric complicationswere not associated with the later development of psychosis in the UHR group included in this study. Conclusions: This study does not suppor t a role for OCs as a risk factorfor the later development of psychosis; however, we cannot conclude that they should be completely ignored as a candidate risk factor for onset of psychosis. A number of weaknesses of the study suggest that it may be premature to dismiss OCs as a risk factor for the development of psychosis and further research is urged in this area.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document