scholarly journals Psychiatry in the new undergraduate curriculum

1999 ◽  
Vol 5 (6) ◽  
pp. 415-419 ◽  
Author(s):  
Howard Ring ◽  
David Mumford ◽  
Cornelius Katona

Recognising the vast extent of psychiatric morbidity internationally and the burden of mental illness on people, communities and nations, the World Psychiatric Association and the World Federation for Medical Education have recently published global guidelines for developing core curricula in psychiatry for medical students (Walton & Gelder 1999). More locally, major changes are taking place in undergraduate medical education throughout the UK. These changes represent a response to the appreciation, both by medical schools and by the General Medical Council (GMC), of two major pressures in undergraduate education. The first is that students have been asked over the years to accumulate more and more factual knowledge while the knowledge base in medicine itself expands and changes more rapidly. The second is that both understanding of illness and delivery of care are developing an increasing focus on the role of the community and community support. These general pressures have led to a number of specific recommendations, initially put forward by the GMC in their document Tomorrow's Doctors (GMC, 1993). This document encourages the reduction of ‘core knowledge’ taught to medical students to 65% of what has previously been taught, together with the identification of special study modules (SSMs), which would fill the remaining time in the curriculum. These SSMs would allow students to explore areas of particular interest in greater depth than was previously possible.

1999 ◽  
Vol 23 (9) ◽  
pp. 549-550 ◽  
Author(s):  
Margaret Butterworth ◽  
Gill Livingston

As early as 1863 the education committee of the General Medical Council (GMC) recognised the tendency of medical education to overload medical students with factual knowledge. Since then, there has been a considerable body of evidence that when students spend their time learning facts only, they often fail to apply the knowledge that they have gained (Ramsden, 1992). In 1993 the education committee of the GMC made detailed recommendations regarding a change to more problem-orientated learning and the encouragement of students to learn independently (GMC, 1993). This is currently leading to changes within all medical schools curricula so that students will be helped to integrate their formal learning with the experience of seeing patients and their families and thus be able to apply their factual knowledge.


2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sneha Barai

UNSTRUCTURED The UK General Medical Council (GMC) explicitly states doctors have a duty to ‘contribute to teaching and training…by acting as a positive role model’. However, recent studies suggest some are not fulfilling this, which is impacting medical students' experiences and attitudes during their training. As such, doctors have a duty to act as role models and teachers, as specified by the GMC, which it seems are not currently being fulfilled. This would improve the medical students’ learning experiences and demonstrate good professional values for them to emulate. Therefore, these duties should be as important as patient care, since this will influence future generations.


Author(s):  
Patrick Magee ◽  
Mark Tooley

The World Federation of Societies of Anaesthesiology (WFSA) adopted standards relating to the safe practice of anaesthesia in 1992 and such standards had already been proposed by a number of countries in order to cut the morbidity due to anaesthesia itself. In the modern era it is easy to forget that historically anaesthesia and surgery did indeed have associated morbidity and mortality and there was very little assistance from technology to monitor patients. The evolution of these standards is based on two main requirements of monitoring. The first is to record anticipated deviations from normal values, which require accurate measurement to ensure patient safety. The second is to warn of unexpected, life-threatening events that, by definition, occur without warning, and could affect the fit, young patient as easily as the old and infirm. All international standards stress the importance of the continual presence of a fully trained and accredited anaesthetic person, and one Australian study demonstrated that many mishaps occur in the absence of such a person [Runciman 1988]. This applies to general and regional anaesthesia, sedation and recovery. Because perceptions of safety and standards vary throughout the world, despite the presence of an International Standards Organisation, debate about the minimum requirements for monitoring continue. Central to the maintenance of these standards is the quality of persons entering the specialty, the quality of training programmes, and the continuing education of specialists throughout a professional lifetime [Sykes 1992]. It is difficult to determine with certainty the effect that additional technological monitoring has on safety. One clear example is the inability of the trained human eye to detect cyanosis, this human failure occurring maximally at 81–85% oxygen saturation. Clearly, the pulse oximeter has improved the quality of cyanosis detection. Numerous studies all over the world have shown that mortality due to anaesthesia itself fell significantly between the 1950s and the 1980s, by which time extensive technological monitoring was being introduced, and training programmes had been very much improved. Utting [1987] reviewed 750 cases of death and cerebral damage reported to the British General Medical Council between 1970 and 1982 that were thought to be the result of errors in technique.


2014 ◽  
Vol 96 (7) ◽  
pp. 240-243 ◽  
Author(s):  
RO Forsythe ◽  
MF Eylert

With few foundation doctors (FDs) expressing any interest in urology and the lack of a formal undergraduate curriculum in urology, 1 it has been documented that undergraduate exposure to urology is inadequate 2 and that FDs are unable to perform basic urological procedures, 3 in which they should be competent as specified in the General Medical Council (GMC) publication Tomorrow’s Doctors. 4


1997 ◽  
Vol 90 (1) ◽  
pp. 19-22 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hagen Rampes ◽  
Fiona Sharples ◽  
Sarah Maragh ◽  
Peter Fisher

We surveyed the deans of British medical schools to determine the provision of complementary medicine in the undergraduate curriculum. We also sampled medical students at one British medical school to determine their knowledge of, and views on instruction in, complementary medicine. There is little education in complementary medicine at British medical schools, but it is an area of active curriculum development. Students' levels of knowledge vary widely between different therapies. Most medical students would like to learn about acupuncture, hypnosis, homoeopathy and osteopathy. We conclude that complementary medicine should be included in the medical undergraduate curriculum. This could be done without a great increase in teaching of facts, and could serve as a vehicle to introduce broader issues, as recommended by the General Medical Council.


BMJ Open ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
pp. e034468 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nicholas Holt ◽  
Kirsty Crowe ◽  
Daniel Lynagh ◽  
Zoe Hutcheson

BackgroundPoor communication between healthcare professionals is recognised as accounting for a significant proportion of adverse patient outcomes. In the UK, the General Medical Council emphasises effective handover (handoff) as an essential outcome for medical graduates. Despite this, a significant proportion of medical schools do not teach the skill.ObjectivesThis study had two aims: (1) demonstrate a need for formal handover training through assessing the pre-existing knowledge, skills and attitudes of medical students and (2) study the effectiveness of a pilot educational handover workshop on improving confidence and competence in structured handover skills.DesignStudents underwent an Objective Structured Clinical Examination style handover competency assessment before and after attending a handover workshop underpinned by educational theory. Participants also completed questionnaires before and after the workshop. The tool used to measure competency was developed through a modified Delphi process.SettingMedical education departments within National Health Service (NHS) Lanarkshire hospitals.ParticipantsForty-two undergraduate medical students rotating through their medical and surgical placements within NHS Lanarkshire enrolled in the study. Forty-one students completed all aspects.Main outcome measuresPaired questionnaires, preworkshop and postworkshop, ascertained prior teaching and confidence in handover skills. The questionnaires also elicited the student’s views on the importance of handover and the potential effects on patient safety. The assessment tool measured competency over 12 domains.ResultsEighty-three per cent of participants reported no previous handover teaching. There was a significant improvement, p<0.0001, in confidence in delivering handovers after attending the workshop. Student performance in the handover competency assessment showed a significant improvement (p<0.05) in 10 out of the 12 measured handover competency domains.ConclusionsA simple, robust and reproducible intervention, underpinned by medical education theory, can significantly improve competence and confidence in medical handover. Further research is required to assess long-term outcomes as student’s transition from undergraduate to postgraduate training.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dhruv Gupta ◽  
Lahvanya Shantharam ◽  
Bridget Kathryn MacDonald

Abstract Background:It is now a General Medical Council requirement to incorporate sustainable healthcare teaching (SHT) into medical curricula. To date, research has focussed on the perspective of educators and which sustainable healthcare topics to include in teaching. However, to our knowledge, no previous study has investigated the perspective of both undergraduate and postgraduate medical students in the UK regarding current and future incorporation of SHT in medical education.Methods:A questionnaire was circulated to clinical year medical students and students intercalating after completing at least one clinical year in a London University. The anonymous questionnaire consisted of sections on the environmental impact, current teaching and future teaching of SHT.Results:163 students completed the questionnaire. 93% of participants believed that climate change is a concern in current society, and only 1.8% thought they have been formally taught what sustainable healthcare is. No participants strongly agreed, and only 5 participants (3.1%) agreed, that they would feel confident in answering exam questions on this topic, with 89% agreeing that more SHT is needed. 60% believe that future teaching should be incorporated in both preclinical and clinical years, with 31% of participants preferring online modules as the method of teaching.Conclusion: Our novel study has stressed the lack of current sustainable healthcare teaching in the medical curriculum. From a student perspective, using online modules throughout medical school presents an attractive method of incorporating sustainable healthcare teaching in the future.


2019 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 7-8
Author(s):  
Muhammad Idrees Anwar

  ‘The doctors of tomorrow will be applying knowledge and deploying skills which are at present unforeseen’. This was written by General Medical Council , UK in “Tomorrow’s Doctor” 1993,(General Medical Council, 1993), but this still holds true. We as health care providers strive to provide the best of care to our patients and perhaps doing a good job. You may object to this “perhaps “as obviously at a glance the health care appears optimal. But we do not know that underneath this poise and calm sea are deadly sharks that gulp and bite our results. Statistically speaking, there is one in eleven million risks of being bitten by a shark. In comparison, the risk of patient death occurring due to a preventable medical accident, while receiving health care, is estimated to be one in three hundred. It is obvious that you are safer in diving in the ocean than receiving treatment at a health care facility. Yet it is preventable. This preventable medical accident is the hidden shark of our clinical practice that bites our results without us even knowing about it. Hippocrates defined patient safety as primum no nocere, or “First, do no harm.” Yet we discovered it quite recently. A television program by the name of ” Deep Sleep “ aired in April 1983 first shocked the public that six thousand patients die due to anesthesia-related deaths. In 1983, the Harvard Medical School and the British Royal Society of Medicine jointly sponsored a symposium on anesthesia, deaths, and injuries. They also agreed to share statistics and to conduct studies for all anesthesia accidents. In 1984, the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) had established the Anesthesia Patient Safety Foundation (APSF). The foundation marked the first use of the term “patient safety” in the name of a professional reviewing organization. The Australian Patient Safety Foundation was founded in 1989 for anesthesia error monitoring. Both organizations were soon expanded, as the magnitude of the medical error crisis became known. The studies expanded to all specialties, areas, and actual impact was measured. It is now estimated that that healthcare errors impact one in every ten patients around the world, the World Health Organization calls patient safety an endemic concern. Alarming, isn’t it? Yes, it is quite an alarming situation and it is the time that we all must blow the whistle to this global as well as regional problem. We are at a very initial stage where most of us are not even aware of its serious concerns. The waters are infested with sharks, and we must know and learn how to tackle them. The errors typically include surgical, diagnostic, medication, devices and equipment, and systems failures, infections, falls, and healthcare technology. Wrong or missed diagnosis and side effects of drugs are more common. No area of health care delivery is exempt, but they occur more so in an emergency room and outpatient clinic. (Bari, Khan, & Rathore, 2016) Errors are classified as two types: 1. Errors of omission occur because of actions not taken. Examples are not putting a strap to a patient. 2. Errors of the commission occur because of the wrong action taken. Examples include administering a medication to which a patient has a known allergy. You must be wondering why I chose this in a medical education journal. First and foremost, it is one of the serious international health concerns in the current era. Globally, almost a million patients die each year along with the cost associated with medication errors of about $42 billion USD annually. Secondly, the key to the solution lies with medical educationists. By now, you must be wondering how medical educationists could solve the predicament. Well! The solution lies in developing skills like communication, organization, teamwork, leadership, and decision-making. Not just the skills but also patient safety attitudes have to be adapted along with developing a “safety culture” at the workplace (Ayub & Khan, 2018). Our doctors of future and health care centers will only be safe if the safety is taught and assessed, at every level of learning and teaching. The culture of patient safety is created by identifying errors, developing systems based on newer technologies to recognize and correct errors. A broad range of safety culture properties can be organized into multiple subcultures like leadership, teamwork, evidence-based patient care, communication, learning from errors, identifying systems errors, and providing patient-centered care. Currently, the issue is remotely addressed in learning and teaching at both graduate and postgraduate levels. It is imperative that medical educationist should play their role by not only learning but also teaching all the necessary skills required to develop a safe environment for patients. The waters are full of sharks, and we must take protective measures. Stay safe References Ayub, A., & Khan, R. A. 2018. Learning to cure with care: Awareness of faculty and medical students about students’ roles related to patient safety. J. Pak. Med. Assoc., 68(9). Bari, A., Khan, R. A., & Rathore, A. W. 2016. Medical errors; causes, consequences, emotional response and resulting behavioral change. Pakistan J. Med. Sci., 32(3) doi:10.12669/ pjms.323.9701. General Medical Council, U.K. (1993). Tomorrow’s doctors: Recommendations on undergraduate medical education. London.


2020 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 3-11
Author(s):  
Sadia Jabeen Khan ◽  
Md Humayun Kabir Talukder ◽  
Kazi Khairul Alam ◽  
Farhana Haque ◽  
Md Rezaul Karim

This descriptive type of cross sectional study was carried out to evaluate the attitude of undergraduate medical students of Bangladesh regarding selected areas of professionalism like honesty and confidentiality. Study period was from July 2017 to June 2018. Sample size was 837 undergraduates medical students of 1st, 2nd, 3rd and 4th phase of MBBS course from four public and four non government medical colleges of Bangladesh. Convenience sampling technique was adopted in this study. Data collection was done by a modified structured situational judgment test (SJT) self-administered questionnaire which was adopted from general medical council (GMC) and by in-depth interview schedule of students. The data were then compiled and analyzed using SPSS Version 19.Among the study participants, 37.20% (310) and 62 .80% (537) were males and females respectively. Attitude towards the two most major issues of professionalism were good, mean score were above three in honesty. Mean score was below three in maintaining confidentiality. Result of the present study shows that female students had higher mean professionalism than male. Female students were better than the male students in regards to all two different professional issues and this difference is statistically highly significant (P=0.00). Mean score of professionalism of 1st phase students in all two issues were greater than the respondents of other three phases and this findings was also statistically significant. Medical undergraduates of Bangladesh have a good understanding of acceptable professional honesty but there is scope of improvement. Study recommended that these two issues of professionalism must be taught in the course of undergraduate medical education and should be incorporated in undergraduate medical curriculum with the details of learning outcome what we craving from a registered medical graduate so that learning can be turned into practice. Bangladesh Journal of Medical Education Vol.11(1) 2020: 3-11


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document