scholarly journals Internet-delivered therapy for anxiety disorders: a solution to unequal access to treatment?

2015 ◽  
Vol 21 (5) ◽  
pp. 291-294
Author(s):  
Mary Jane Attenburrow ◽  
Katharine Smith
Keyword(s):  
Anxiety Disorders ◽  
Behavioural Therapy ◽  
Preliminary Review ◽  
Access To Treatment ◽  
Treatment Delivery ◽  
Face To Face ◽  
Cognitive Behavioural ◽  
Unequal Access ◽  
Chronic Course ◽  
Internet Delivery

SummaryAnxiety disorders are common, often have a chronic course and frequently coexist with other psychiatric disorders. Psychological therapy is recommended as first-line treatment, but equitable access remains a challenge. This month's Cochrane Corner review assesses the evidence for the efficacy of therapist-supported cognitive-behavioural therapy (CBT) for anxiety disorders delivered via the internet. Although internet delivery of therapy is attractive for many reasons, and the results of this preliminary review suggest that it is efficacious, this is a rapidly expanding field. Further updates of this review will include more evidence to support or refute the use of this new method of treatment delivery, either alongside or in preference to standard face-to-face CBT.

Face-to-face versus Video Teleconference Group Cognitive Behavioural Therapy for Anxiety and Related Disorders: A Preliminary Comparison: Thérapie cognitivo-comportementale de groupe en personne contre par vidéo téléconférence pour l’anxiété et les troubles connexes: une comparaison préliminaire

2021 ◽  
pp. 070674372110273
Author(s):  
Irena Milosevic ◽  
Duncan H. Cameron ◽  
Melissa Milanovic ◽  
Randi E. McCabe ◽  
Karen Rowa
Keyword(s):  
Anxiety Disorder ◽  
Anxiety Disorders ◽  
Cognitive Behavioural Therapy ◽  
Behavioural Therapy ◽  
Symptom Improvement ◽  
Face To Face ◽  
Compulsive Disorder ◽  
Cognitive Behavioural ◽  
Group Cbt ◽  
Delivery Formats

Objective: Telehealth is being increasingly incorporated into the delivery of mental health care and has received widespread attention during the COVID-19 pandemic for its ability to facilitate care during physical distancing restrictions. Videoconferencing is a common telehealth modality for delivering psychotherapy and has demonstrated similar outcomes to those of face-to-face therapy. Cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) is the most common psychotherapy evaluated across various telehealth modalities; however, studies on CBT delivered via videoconference, particularly in a group therapy format, are lacking. Further, little research exists on videoconference group CBT for anxiety disorders. Accordingly, the present study compared the outcomes of group CBT for anxiety and related disorders delivered via videoconference versus face-to-face. Method: Using a non-randomized design, data on attendance, dropout, clinical outcomes, and functional impairment were collected from 413 adult outpatients of a tertiary care anxiety disorders clinic who attended a CBT group for panic disorder/agoraphobia, social anxiety disorder, generalized anxiety disorder (GAD), or obsessive-compulsive disorder delivered either face-to-face (pre-COVID-19 pandemic) or via videoconference (since the onset of COVID-19 pandemic). Outcomes were assessed using well-validated self-report measures. Data were collected pre-treatment, across 12 weekly sessions, and post-treatment. Intent-to-treat analyses were applied to symptom outcome measures. Results: Face-to-face CBT conferred only a slight benefit over videoconference CBT for symptom outcomes across all groups, but when assessed individually, only the GAD group showed greater symptom improvement in the face-to-face format. Effect sizes for significant differences between the delivery formats were small. Participants in videoconference groups tended to have slightly higher attendance rates in some instances, whereas functional improvement and treatment dropout were comparable across the delivery formats. Conclusions: Results provide preliminary evidence that videoconference group CBT for anxiety and related disorders may be a promising and effective alternative to face-to-face CBT. Additional research is needed to establish equivalence between these delivery formats.

scholarly journals Acceptability, effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of blended cognitive-behavioural therapy (bCBT) versus face-to-face CBT (ftfCBT) for anxiety disorders in specialised mental health care: A 15-week randomised controlled trial with 1-year follow-up

PLoS ONE ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (11) ◽  
pp. e0259493
Author(s):  
Geke Romijn ◽  
Neeltje Batelaan ◽  
Jeroen Koning ◽  
Anton van Balkom ◽  
Aart de Leeuw ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mental Health ◽  
Health Care ◽  
Cost Effectiveness ◽  
Anxiety Disorders ◽  
Behavioural Therapy ◽  
Face To Face ◽  
Point Estimates ◽  
Cognitive Behavioural ◽  
One Year

Background Anxiety disorders are highly prevalent and cause substantial economic burden. Blended cognitive-behavioural therapy (bCBT), which integrates Internet-based CBT and face-to-face CBT (ftfCBT), is an attractive and potentially cost-saving treatment alternative to conventional CBT for patients with anxiety disorders in specialised mental health care. However, little is known about the effectiveness of bCBT in routine care. We examined the acceptability, effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of bCBT versus ftfCBT in outpatient specialised care to patients with panic disorder, social anxiety disorder and generalised anxiety disorder. Methods and findings Patients with anxiety disorders were randomised to bCBT (n = 52) or ftfCBT (n = 62). Acceptability of bCBT and ftfCBT were evaluated by assessing treatment preference, adherence, satisfaction and therapeutic alliance. Costs and effects were assessed at post-treatment and one-year follow-up. Primary outcome measure was the Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI). Secondary outcomes were depressive symptoms, general psychopathology, work and social adjustment, quality of life and mastery. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) were computed from societal and healthcare perspectives by calculating the incremental costs per incremental quality-adjusted life year (QALY). No significant differences between bCBT and ftfCBT were found on acceptability or effectiveness measures at post-treatment (Cohen’s d between-group effect size on BAI = 0.15, 95% CI −0.30 to 0.60) or at one-year follow-up (d = −0.38, 95% CI −0.84 to 0.09). The modelled point estimates of societal costs (bCBT €10945, ftfCBT €10937) were higher and modelled point estimates of direct medical costs (bCBT €3748, ftfCBT €3841) were lower in bCBT. The acceptability curves showed that bCBT was expected to be a cost-effective intervention. Results should be carefully interpreted due to the small sample size. Conclusions bCBT appears an acceptable, clinically effective and potentially cost-saving alternative option for treating patients with anxiety disorders. Trials with larger samples are needed to further investigate cost-effectiveness. Trial registration Netherlands Trial Register: NTR4912.

scholarly journals Treatment of child anxiety disorders via guided parent-delivered cognitive–behavioural therapy: Randomised controlled trial

2013 ◽  
Vol 203 (6) ◽  
pp. 436-444 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kerstin Thirlwall ◽  
Peter J. Cooper ◽  
Jessica Karalus ◽  
Merryn Voysey ◽  
Lucy Willetts ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Anxiety Disorder ◽  
Anxiety Disorders ◽  
Child Anxiety ◽  
Behavioural Therapy ◽  
Primary Diagnosis ◽  
Post Treatment ◽  
Wait List ◽  
Face To Face ◽  
Cognitive Behavioural ◽  
A Current

BackgroundPromising evidence has emerged of clinical gains using guided self-help cognitive–behavioural therapy (CBT) for child anxiety and by involving parents in treatment; however, the efficacy of guided parent-delivered CBT has not been systematically evaluated in UK primary and secondary settings.AimsTo evaluate the efficacy of low-intensity guided parent-delivered CBT treatments for children with anxiety disorders.MethodA total of 194 children presenting with a current anxiety disorder, whose primary carer did not meet criteria for a current anxiety disorder, were randomly allocated to full guided parent-delivered CBT (four face-to-face and four telephone sessions) or brief guided parent-delivered CBT (two face-to-face and two telephone sessions), or a wait-list control group (trial registration: ISRCTN92977593). Presence and severity of child primary anxiety disorder (Anxiety Disorders Interview Schedule for DSM-IV, child/parent versions), improvement in child presentation of anxiety (Clinical Global Impression –Improvement scale), and change in child anxiety symptoms (Spence Children's Anxiety Scale, child/parent version and Child Anxiety Impact scale, parent version) were assessed at post-treatment and for those in the two active treatment groups, 6 months post-treatment.ResultsFull guided parent-delivered CBT produced superior diagnostic outcomes compared with wait-list at post-treatment, whereas brief guided parent-delivered CBT did not: at post-treatment, 25 (50%) of those in the full guided CBT group had recovered from their primary diagnosis, compared with 16 (25%) of those on the wait-list (relative risk (RR) 1.85, 95% CI 1.14–2.99); and in the brief guided CBT group, 18 participants (39%) had recovered from their primary diagnosis post-treatment (RR = 1.56, 95% CI 0.89–2.74). Level of therapist training and experience was unrelated to child outcome.ConclusionsFull guided parent-delivered CBT is an effective and inexpensive first-line treatment for child anxiety.

Using low intensity interventions in the treatment of anxiety disorders

2010 ◽  
pp. 169-176 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nickolai Titov ◽  
Gavin Andrews ◽  
Peter McEvoy
Keyword(s):  
Anxiety Disorders ◽  
Cognitive Behavioural Therapy ◽  
High Intensity ◽  
Behavioural Therapy ◽  
Treatment Protocols ◽  
Face To Face ◽  
Low Intensity ◽  
Cognitive Behavioural ◽  
Key Issues

Chapter 15 describes key issues in using low intensity (LI) cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) interventions for anxiety disorders. Treatment protocols for anxiety disorders were originally developed for high intensity (HI) interventions, which unlike LI interventions, traditionally involve high levels of therapist contact and are usually presented via a face-to-face format. It is therefore important to identify how best to modify treatment protocols for effective and acceptable use in LI interventions, which involve limited therapist contact and may be administered remotely.

Pilot evaluation of a group stabilisation intervention for refugees and asylum seekers with PTSD

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-6
Author(s):  
Mary Griggs ◽  
Cheng Liu ◽  
Kate Cooper
Keyword(s):  
Repeated Measures ◽  
Asylum Seekers ◽  
Preliminary Evidence ◽  
Behavioural Therapy ◽  
Post Traumatic Stress ◽  
Group Setting ◽  
Post Intervention ◽  
Treatment Delivery ◽  
Cognitive Behavioural ◽  
The Uk

Abstract Background: Post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) is commonly experienced by asylum seekers and refugees (ASR). Evidence supports the use of cognitive behavioural therapy-based treatments, but not in group format for this population. However, group-based treatments are frequently used as a first-line intervention in the UK. Aims: This study investigated the feasibility of delivering a group-based, manualised stabilisation course specifically developed for ASR. The second aim was to evaluate the use of routine outcome measures (ROMs) to capture psychological change in this population. Method: Eighty-two participants from 22 countries attended the 8-session Moving On After Trauma (MOAT) group-based stabilisation treatment. PHQ-9, GAD-7, IES-R and idiosyncratic outcomes were administered pre- and post-intervention. Results: Seventy-one per cent of participants (n = 58) attended five or more of the treatment sessions. While completion rates of the ROMs were poor – measures were completed at pre- and post-intervention for 46% participants (n = 38) – a repeated-measures MANOVA indicated significant improvements in depression (p = .001, ηp2 = .262), anxiety (p = .000, ηp2 = .390), PTSD (p = .001, ηp2 = .393) and idiosyncratic measures (p = .000, ηp2 = .593) following the intervention. Conclusions: Preliminary evidence indicates that ASR who attended a low-intensity, group-based stabilisation group for PTSD experienced lower mental health scores post-group, although the lack of a comparison group means these results should be interpreted with caution. There are significant challenges in administering ROMs to individuals who speak many different languages, in a group setting. Nonetheless, groups have benefits including efficiency of treatment delivery which should also be considered.

scholarly journals An investigation of general predictors for cognitive–behavioural therapy outcome for anxiety disorders in a routine clinical setting

BMJ Open ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 6 (3) ◽  
pp. e010898 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sara Kerstine Kaya Nielsen ◽  
Signe Vangkilde ◽  
Kate B Wolitzky-Taylor ◽  
Sarah Ingrid Franksdatter Daniel ◽  
Ida Hageman
Keyword(s):  
Anxiety Disorders ◽  
Cognitive Behavioural Therapy ◽  
Clinical Setting ◽  
Behavioural Therapy ◽  
Therapy Outcome ◽  
Cognitive Behavioural ◽  
Routine Clinical Setting

scholarly journals Helpful and Hindering Events in Internet-Delivered Cognitive Behavioural Treatment for Generalized Anxiety

2018 ◽  
Vol 47 (3) ◽  
pp. 386-399 ◽  
Author(s):  
John Burke ◽  
Derek Richards ◽  
Ladislav Timulak
Keyword(s):  
Anxiety Disorders ◽  
Behavioural Change ◽  
Behavioural Therapy ◽  
Generalized Anxiety ◽  
Behavioural Treatment ◽  
Future Directions ◽  
Helpful Events ◽  
Cognitive Behavioural ◽  
Technical Issues ◽  
Interpretative Framework

Background: Anxiety disorders are a highly prevalent cause of impairment globally with generalized anxiety disorder (GAD) sharing many features with other anxiety disorders. Aims: The present study investigated the helpful and hindering events and impacts for individuals with generalized anxiety who engaged with a supported 6-week online intervention based on cognitive behavioural therapy (iCBT). Method: Participants (n = 36) completed the Helpful and Hindering Aspects of Therapy (HAT) for each session. A descriptive-interpretative framework was used to analyse the data. Results: Helpful events were identified by participants as CBT techniques including psychoeducation, monitoring, cognitive restructuring and relaxation, and found supporter interaction, mindfulness and reading personal stories helpful. The associated impacts were identified as support and validation; behavioural change/applying coping strategies; clarification, awareness, and insight; reassurance/relief; and self-efficacy/empowerment. Hindering events were identified as treatment content/form; and amount of work/technical issues, which led to impacts such as frustration/irritation; increased anxiety; and isolation. Conclusion: The implications of the results, potential future directions of research and limitations of the study are discussed.

Treatment of anxiety disorders

2020 ◽  
pp. 961-966
Author(s):  
David S. Baldwin ◽  
Nathan T.M Huneke
Keyword(s):  
Anxiety Disorders ◽  
Previous Treatment ◽  
Patient Characteristics ◽  
Evidence Base ◽  
Behavioural Therapy ◽  
Physical Symptoms ◽  
Need For Treatment ◽  
Cognitive Behavioural ◽  
Choice Of Treatment ◽  
Characteristic Features

The personal and societal burden associated with anxiety disorders is considerable, but many individuals who might benefit from treatment are not recognized. Recognition relies on awareness of psychological and physical symptoms common to all anxiety disorders, and accurate diagnosis on identifying specific features of particular disorders. The need for treatment is determined by the severity and persistence of symptoms, the impact of symptoms on everyday life, the presence of coexisting depressive symptoms, and other features such as response to previous treatment approaches. Patient characteristics and patient and doctor preferences influence the choice of treatment. There is much overlap between anxiety disorders in evidence-based and effective therapies (such as the prescription of a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor or a course of individual cognitive behavioural therapy), but there are also important differences, so it helps to be familiar with the characteristic features and evidence base for each condition.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document