scholarly journals Care programme approach: relapsing or recovering?

2005 ◽  
Vol 11 (5) ◽  
pp. 325-329 ◽  
Author(s):  
David Kingdon ◽  
Shabbir Amanullah

The care programme approach (CPA) has become an accepted part of clinical practice, despite the continuing lack of strong direct evidence of its value. Guidance from the Department of Health has refined the original requirements, which were to ensure health and social care assessment, discharge from hospital to appropriate accommodation with necessary support, appointment of a mental health professional to draw up a care plan, and coordination of its implementation with necessary follow-up. The CPA now specifies that care plans include provision, as necessary, for risk assessment and management, employment, leisure, accommodation and plans to meet carers' needs. Levels of care have been simplified to ‘standard’ and ‘enhanced’. In future it will need to incorporate issues arising from the development of specialist teams as part of the National Health Service Plan, concern about the physical healthcare of those subject to it and the continuing development of psychosocial interventions.

2006 ◽  
Vol 30 (11) ◽  
pp. 415-418 ◽  
Author(s):  
Afia Ali ◽  
Ian Hall ◽  
Claire Taylor ◽  
Stephen Attard ◽  
Angela Hassiotis

Aims and MethodAnnual audits of the enhanced care programme approach (CPA) were conducted from 2002 to 2005 to evaluate and improve the implementation of CPA in two inner-London community learning disability services. The CPA standards included those stipulated by the Department of Health. The notes of all patients on enhanced CPA were analysed using a structured data collection form.ResultsThere was a gradual improvement in the attainment of targets by both services. Areas of strength included allocating a date for the next CPA review, crisis plans and documentation of service users' comments. Areas of weakness included completion and review of risk assessments and the availability of a care plan for the previous 6 months.Clinical ImplicationsCompleting the audit cycle and reauditing improves attainment of targets and encourages service development, but further progress is required.


2017 ◽  
Vol 5 (31) ◽  
pp. 1-186 ◽  
Author(s):  
Katrina Forsyth ◽  
Laura Archer-Power ◽  
Jane Senior ◽  
Rachel Meacock ◽  
Roger Webb ◽  
...  

Background Older people are the fastest-growing group in prisons in England and Wales and have complex health and social care needs that often remain unmet. Objectives (1) Evaluate the efficacy of the Older prisoner Health and Social Care Assessment and Plan (OHSCAP) in improving (i) the ability to meet older male prisoners’ health and social care needs, (ii) health-related quality of life (HRQoL), (iii) depressive symptoms and (iv) functional health and well-being and activities of daily living; (2) assess the quality of care plans produced; (3) explore the experiences of older prisoners receiving, and staff conducting, the OHSCAP; and (4) evaluate the cost-effectiveness of the OHSCAP compared with treatment as usual (TAU). Design Multicentre, parallel-group randomised controlled trial (RCT) with follow-up at 3 months, with a nested qualitative study and quality audit of care plans (n = 150, 68%). Setting Ten English prisons. Participants Four hundred and ninety-seven newly arrived male prisoners aged ≥ 50 years with a discharge date at least 3 months from recruitment. A total of 14 prisoners and 11 staff participated in qualitative interviews. Intervention Randomisation to OHSCAP or TAU. The OHSCAP group had health and social needs assessed by a trained health-care worker or prison officer. Care plans were devised and subsequent actions included professional support and appropriate referrals. Main outcome measures Primary outcome measure – mean number of unmet health and social care needs as measured by the Camberwell Assessment of Need – Short Forensic Version. Secondary outcome measures – measures of functional health and well-being, depressive symptoms and HRQoL. A health economic evaluation was undertaken using service contact between baseline and follow-up and appropriate unit cost information. Results A total of 497 prisoners were recruited (248 to OHSCAP and 249 to TAU). The 404 completed follow-ups were split evenly between the trial arms. No significant differences were observed between the intervention and TAU groups in relation to the primary outcome measure. The OHSCAP did not demonstrate convincing benefits in HRQoL over TAU, and there were no significant differences in relation to costs. Audit and qualitative data suggest that the intervention was not implemented as planned. Limitations As a result of the limited follow-up period, potential long-term gains of the intervention were not measured. Some of the standardised tools had limited applicability in prison settings. Cost-effectiveness data were limited by unavailability of relevant unit cost data. Conclusions The OHSCAP failed in its primary objective but, fundamentally, was not implemented as planned. This appears to have been attributable, in some part, to wider difficulties currently affecting the prison landscape, including reduced levels of staffing, the loss of specialist support roles for such initiatives and increased prevalence of regime disruption. Future work Partnership working and information sharing across disciplines within prison settings require improvement. Research should explore the potential involvement of other prisoners and third-sector organisations in identifying and addressing older prisoners’ health and social care needs to better match community provision. Further examination should be undertaken of how the prison regime and system affects the well-being of older prisoners. Future prison-based RCTs should carefully balance the fidelity of initiatives being evaluated and testing in a ‘real-life’ setting. Trial registration Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN11841493. Funding This project was funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Health Services and Delivery Research programme and will be published in full in Health Services and Delivery Research; Vol. 5, No. 31. See the NIHR Journals Library website for further project information.


2002 ◽  
Vol 25 (4) ◽  
pp. 1 ◽  
Author(s):  
David Wilkinson ◽  
Heather McElroy ◽  
Justin Beilby ◽  
Kathy Mott ◽  
Kay Price ◽  
...  

We aimed to describe the uptake of the Enhanced Primary Care (EPC) item numbers listed on the Medicare Benefits Schedule for health assessment (HA), care plan (CP) and case conference (CC) between November 1999 (when these items first became available) and October 2001. We used data provided by the Commonwealth Department of Health and Ageing. General practitioners rendered 371,409 EPC services in all. Most services were HA (225,353;61%), most of the remainder were CP (134,688;36%), and CC comprised the rest (11,368;3%). The number of HA done increased steadily and has stabilised at around 13,000 HA per month. Most CP done (80%) were in the community and with the GP preparing the plan. From a slow start, the number of CP done increased rapidly in 2001 to about 15,000 per month. There has been a slow and steady increase in the number of CC done each month, reaching 8-900 per month. Uptake of the EPC item numbers in the first two years of their availability has been rapid and has reached substantial levels, especially for HA and CP. The uptake of CC has been slower.


1998 ◽  
Vol 3 (3) ◽  
pp. 135-138
Author(s):  
Claire Sturge

In September 1997 the President's Interdisciplinary Committee organised a conference to look at issues around Care Planning. As important as the content of the conference was the aim of fostering mutual understanding and the cross-fertilisation of ideas across disciplines. Papers were given by judges, social services directors, guardians, Department of Health representatives, researchers, and child and adolescent mental health specialists. Interdisciplinary workshop discussions followed each paper generating group views and papers. All the papers have just been published as a book (Clarke, 1998).Dominating themes were the question of what, if any, influence the judge can exert over the Care Plan, the possibility of refusing to make a Care Order because of an unsatisfactory Care Plan, the value of the Care Plan and the accuracy of its details as a way of furthering and protecting a child's needs, the uncertainty about the proportion of cases where the Care Plan is altered or abandoned for good or bad reasons or major drift occurs, and ways of improving the quality of Care Plans through interdisciplinary co-operation. Various ways of dealing with these issues were suggested.


1994 ◽  
Vol 18 (2) ◽  
pp. 68-70 ◽  
Author(s):  
David Kingdon

The care programme approach has been introduced to improve the delivery of services to people with severe mental illness and minimise the risk that they lose contact with mental health services. Its essential elements are assessment of health and social need, a written care plan, nomination of a key worker, and regular review. It requires interprofessional collaboration and negotiation of care plans with users and carers but individual patients vary in their needs for multidisciplinary involvement and review.


Author(s):  
Miles Rinaldi ◽  
Flippa Watkeys

Purpose – Increasingly mental health services are attempting to become recovery focused which demands changing the nature of day-to-day interactions and the quality of the experience in services. Care planning is the daily work of mental health services and within this context, care planning that enhances both the experience and the outcomes of a person's recovery is a key element for effective services. However, care plans, the care planning process and the Care Programme Approach (CPA) continue to pose a challenge for services. The purpose of this paper is to discuss these issues. Design/methodology/approach – Conceptual paper. Findings – Within recovery focused services a care plan becomes the driving force, or action plan, behind a person's recovery journey and is focused on their individual needs, strengths, aspirations and personal goals. If involving people directly in the development of their care plan is critical to creating better outcomes then supporting self-management, shared decision making and coproduction all underpin the care planning process. Based on the evidence of people's experience of care plans and the care planning process it is time to seriously debate our current conceptualisation and approach to care planning and the future of the CPA. Originality/value – The paper describes aspects of the current situation with regard to the effectiveness of care planning in supporting a person's recovery. The paper raises some important questions.


Author(s):  
Candace Necyk ◽  
Jeffrey A. Johnson ◽  
Ross T. Tsuyuki ◽  
Dean T. Eurich

Background: In 2012, the Government of Alberta introduced a funding program to remunerate pharmacists to develop a comprehensive annual care plan (CACP) for patients with complex needs. The objective of this study is to explore patients’ perceptions of the care they received through the pharmacist CACP program in Alberta. Methods: We invited 3442 patients who received a pharmacist-billed CACP within the previous 3 months and 6888 matched controls across Alberta to complete an online questionnaire. The questionnaire consisted of the short version Patient Assessment of Chronic Illness Care (PACIC-11), with 3 additional pharmacy-specific assessment questions added. Additional questions related to health status and demographics were also included. Results: Overall, most patients indicated a low level of chronic illness care by pharmacists, with few differences noted between CACP patients and non-CACP controls. Of note, controls reported higher quality of care for 5 domains within the adapted PACIC-like tool compared with CACP patients ( p < 0.05 for all). Interestingly, only 79 (44%) of CACP patients reported that they had received a CACP, whereas only 192 (66%) of control patients reported that they did not receive a care plan. In a sensitivity analysis including only these respondents, individuals who received a CACP perceived a significantly higher quality of chronic illness care across all PACIC domains. Conclusion: Overall, chronic illness care incentivized by the pharmacist CACP program in Alberta is perceived to be moderate to low. When limited to respondents who explicitly recognized receiving the service or not, the perceptions of quality of care were more positive. This suggests that better implementation of CACP by pharmacists may be associated with improved quality of care and that some redesign is needed to engage patients more. Can Pharm J (Ott) 2021;154:xx-xx.


2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
P Jankowski ◽  
R Topor-Madry ◽  
M Gasior ◽  
U Ceglowska ◽  
Z Eysymontt ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Mortality following acute myocardial infarction (MI) remains high despite progress in pharmacotherapy and interventional treatment. In 2017 a nation-wide system of managed care for MI survivors comprising a continuum of acute treatment of MI, staged revascularization, cardiac rehabilitation, cardiac electrotherapy and cardiac ambulatory care within one year following MI was implemented in Poland. The managed care programme (MCP) includes also the quality of care assessment based on clinical measures (e.g. cardiovascular risk factors control) as well as on the rate of minor and major cardiovascular events. The goal of the analysis was to assess the overall mortality of MI survivors participating and not participating in the MCP. Methods The database of survivors of acute MI discharged from hospital from October 1, 2017 to December 31, 2018 was analyzed. Patients who died within 10 days after discharge were excluded from the analysis. The primary end-point was defined as death from any cause. Propensity-Score Matching (PSM) using nearest neighbor matching was used to form comparable groups of patients participating and not participating in the MCP. The Cox proportional hazard regression analysis was used to assess the relation between MCP and the overall mortality. Results MCP was implemented in the first stage in 48 hospitals spread around the country (about 34% of all hospitals treating acute MI patients in Poland). Out of 87739 analyzed patients (age: 68.1±11.9 years; 55581 men and 32158 women) 34064 were hospitalized in hospitals with MCP implemented. Altogether 10404 patients (11.9% of the whole cohort; 30.5% of those hospitalized in hospitals with MCP implemented) participated in MCP. They were matched with 10404 patients not participating in the MCP. During 324.8±140.5 days of follow-up 7413 patients died. One-year mortality was lower in patients participating in the MCP both when we analyzed the whole cohort (4.4% vs. 9.5%; p&lt;0.001) as well as when we limited the analysis to the PSM groups (4.4% vs. 6.5%; p&lt;0.001, figure 1). MCP was related to the overall mortality in univariate (HR 0.43 [0.39–0.48]) as well as in multivariate analysis (0.64 [0.57–0.71]) in the whole cohort as well as in the PSM cohort (HR 0.63 [0.56–0.72] and 0.64 [0.56–0.72] for the univariate and multivariate analysis respectively). When we limited the analysis to hospitals in which MCP was implemented one-year mortality was 4.3% vs. 6.3% (p&lt;0.001) whereas univariate HR was 0.51 (0.44–0.60) and multivariate HR 0.52 (0.44–0.61). Conclusion The implemented in Poland nation-wide system of managed care for MI survivors is related to improved survival. Therefore, the Ministry of Health plans to implement the programme in all cardiac centers in Poland. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: None


2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 49-49
Author(s):  
Jennifer DeGennaro ◽  
Sherry Pomerantz ◽  
Margaret Avallone ◽  
Melonie Handberry ◽  
Elyse Perweiler

Abstract The NJGWEP team in partnership with Fair Share Housing/Northgate II (NGII), an affordable housing complex in Camden, NJ, employed an iterative quality improvement process to collaboratively develop a Resident Health Risk Assessment (RHRA) to meet the needs of the housing facility and incorporate the essential elements of the 4Ms framework (Mentation, Medication, Mobility, and What Matters). Using the RHRA, NG II social services staff and Rutgers School of Nursing (RSoN) students were trained to collect health information and administer several evidence-based screening tools (i.e., MiniCog, TUG, PHQ-2). A final element of the RHRA still in development is the documentation process of referral and follow-up based on personalized care plans. Since July 2019, 43 RHRAs have been completed (60% female, mean age 66, age range=43 to 88). Almost all residents (94%) have at least 1 chronic condition (HTN, DM, COPD, CHF), although only 26% have an advance care plan. Most (81%) were screened for future fall risk; function (ADLs/IADLs) was assessed for all (100%). Every resident who was able or did not refuse (88%) was screened for cognitive impairment. Just 7% were taking a high-risk medication (i.e., an opioid or benzodiazepine). The NJGWEP team has initiated an age-friendly community at NGII by providing education on geriatric-focused topics and implementing the 4Ms-focused RHRA to detect issues impacting the resident’s well-being. Establishing a follow-up process to track referrals to available resources will enable NGII to allow residents to age in place with appropriate supports.


Dementia ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 19 (2) ◽  
pp. 512-517
Author(s):  
Elaine Argyle ◽  
Louise Thomson ◽  
Antony Arthur ◽  
Jill Maben ◽  
Justine Schneider ◽  
...  

Although investment in staff development is a prerequisite for high-quality and innovative care, the training needs of front line care staff involved in direct care have often been neglected, particularly within dementia care provision. The Care Certificate, which was fully launched in England in April 2015, has aimed to redress this neglect by providing a consistent and transferable approach to the training of the front line health and social care workforce. This article describes the early stages of an 18-month evaluation of the Care Certificate and its implementation funded by the Department of Health Policy Research Programme.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document