scholarly journals Clinical relevance of discoveries in psychopharmacogenetics1

2004 ◽  
Vol 10 (6) ◽  
pp. 455-465 ◽  
Author(s):  
Evangelia M. Tsapakis ◽  
Amlan Basu ◽  
Katherine J. Aitchison

Individual genetic variation accounts for some of the variability in response to drugs used routinely in clinical psychiatry. Psychopharmacogenetics focuses on how polymorphisms in genes affecting the mechanism of action of a drug's effect and/or metabolism (both peripheral and central) can influence an individual's clinical response to the drug, in terms of both therapeutic efficacy and adverse effects. Pharmacogenetics promises to be of substantial help in the field of psychiatric pharmacotherapy, but before research findings can be applied to clinical practice, ethical and methodological problems have to be addressed and overcome. This review summarises the most robust findings in the field and outlines how psychopharmacogenetic studies could lead to treatment individualisation.

Author(s):  
A.G. Zamalutdinova ◽  
L.Yu. Kulagina ◽  
\A.Z. Nigmedzyanova ◽  
E.V. Kanner ◽  
M.L. Maksimov

The use of drugs during pregnancy and breastfeeding remains one of the least studied, but important issues in pharmacology today. When choosing medicinal products during pregnancy, one of the crucial principles is to ensure the safety of the embryo and fetus. Among the generally accepted rules aimed at eliminating fetal risk, a decrease in the dosage of the drug to the lower limit of the therapeutic range is usually named. However, one should take into account the changes that occur in the body of a pregnant woman: the body weight and the volume of circulating blood rise, the excretion of drugs is accelerated (the clearance increases), which, on the contrary, requires an increase in the dosages of individual drugs to maintain therapeutic efficacy. Antibacterial drugs (ABD) are the most difficult group of drugs to use, since they require taking into account not only the mechanism of action of drugs, but also the basics of clinical microbiology. ABD occupy a special place in clinical practice, as they are one of the most frequently prescribed classes of drugs.


2002 ◽  
Vol 14 (4) ◽  
pp. 192-195
Author(s):  
F. Koerselman

Background:Knowledge on fundamental aspects of the influence of ‘stress’ on animal and human organisms is accumulating. In clinical situations, however, psychiatrists still do not use apropriate instruments to recognize and handle the impact of daily life stress. DSM-IV is insufficient in this respect.Objective:A different approach is sketched for clinicians to be able to integrate knowledge from research more effectively.Method:Application of a ‘broad’ biological view may reveal the significance of interpretation, emotion, impulse and reaction as stages of a ‘mental tract’, which is involved in processing the input of stressful situations.Result:This may lead to a more rational ‘targeting’ of pharmacological and psychotherapeutic strategies in clinical practice.Conclusion:A re-orientation of clinical psychiatry from mere classification towards a ‘broad’ biological approach may pave the way for a more rational and purposeful application of research findings to therapy.


2010 ◽  
Vol 17 (01) ◽  
pp. 1-11
Author(s):  
ZAFAR IQBAL ◽  
TASNEEM ZAFAR

Curiosity is the nature of man and availability of chance favor the prepared mind to explore the hidden things in the universe.One thought, observation or experience is based for the others. Chemistry is mother of the different disciplines. Macromolecules (carbohydrates,proteins, lipids etc), substitution of different group (R=Alklyl, Aryl etc) in their molecules changes their therapeutic efficacy and pharmacokinetics.Stereoisomerism in macromolecules structures, role of liposome's in penetration of drugs in cosmetics, percentage yield and antibiotics fromnatural moulds plays an important and significant role in pharmacy. The object is to find out a relationship between curiosity, macromoleculesand pharmacy which might be able to clear the concept about mechanism of action of drugs, discovery of the new drugs and to understandpharmacological and adverse effects of drugs. This might be helpful in therapeutic management, follow up and better health care of patientsin future


2020 ◽  
Vol 29 (2) ◽  
pp. 688-704
Author(s):  
Katrina Fulcher-Rood ◽  
Anny Castilla-Earls ◽  
Jeff Higginbotham

Purpose The current investigation is a follow-up from a previous study examining child language diagnostic decision making in school-based speech-language pathologists (SLPs). The purpose of this study was to examine the SLPs' perspectives regarding the use of evidence-based practice (EBP) in their clinical work. Method Semistructured phone interviews were conducted with 25 school-based SLPs who previously participated in an earlier study by Fulcher-Rood et al. 2018). SLPs were asked questions regarding their definition of EBP, the value of research evidence, contexts in which they implement scientific literature in clinical practice, and the barriers to implementing EBP. Results SLPs' definitions of EBP differed from current definitions, in that SLPs only included the use of research findings. SLPs seem to discuss EBP as it relates to treatment and not assessment. Reported barriers to EBP implementation were insufficient time, limited funding, and restrictions from their employment setting. SLPs found it difficult to translate research findings to clinical practice. SLPs implemented external research evidence when they did not have enough clinical expertise regarding a specific client or when they needed scientific evidence to support a strategy they used. Conclusions SLPs appear to use EBP for specific reasons and not for every clinical decision they make. In addition, SLPs rely on EBP for treatment decisions and not for assessment decisions. Educational systems potentially present other challenges that need to be considered for EBP implementation. Considerations for implementation science and the research-to-practice gap are discussed.


2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jurriaan M. J. L. Brouwer ◽  
Erien Olde Hengel ◽  
Arne J. Risselada ◽  
Eric N. van Roon ◽  
Hans Mulder

Abstract Background Clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) recommend the monitoring of somatic parameters in patients treated with antipsychotic drugs in order to detect adverse effects. The objective of this study was to assess, in adult and (frail) elderly populations, the consistency and applicability of the somatic monitoring instructions recommended by established CPGs prior to and during antipsychotic drug use. Methods A search for national and international CPGs was performed by querying the electronic database PubMed and Google. Somatic monitoring instructions were assessed for adult and (frail) elderly populations separately. The applicability of somatic monitoring instructions was assessed using the Systematic Information for Monitoring (SIM) score. Somatic monitoring instructions were considered applicable when a minimum SIM score of 3 was reached. Results In total, 16 CPGs were included, with a total of 231 somatic monitoring instructions (mean: 14; range: 0–47). Of the somatic monitoring instructions, 87% were considered applicable, although critical values and how to respond to aberrant values were only present in 28 and 52% of the available instructions respectively. Only 1 CPG presented an instruction specifically for (frail) elderly populations. Conclusions We emphasize the need for a guideline with somatic monitoring instructions based on the SIM definition for both adult and (frail) elderly populations using antipsychotic drugs. In addition, CPGs should state that clear agreements should be made regarding who is responsible for interventions and somatic monitoring prior to and during antipsychotic drug use.


2020 ◽  
Vol 79 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. 1451.3-1451
Author(s):  
K. Kraev ◽  
M. Geneva-Popova ◽  
S. Popova

Background:Biological drugs are protein derivatives that, as such, are highly immunogenic. In recent years there have been many conflicting opinions about the role of drug immunogenicity in clinical practice.Objectives:To evaluate the drug immunogenicity of TNF-alpha blocking drugs (etanercept and adalimumab) used to treat patients with rheumatoid arthritis. To determine whether their presence can alter the effect of treatment and to evaluate their role in the clinical practice of rheumatologists.Methods:121 patients with rheumatoid arthritis, as well as 31 healthy controls, similar in sex and age, were examined. They were all monitored at 0, 6, 12 and 24 months from the start of TNF-alpha blocker treatment. Demographics, vital signs, markers of inflammation such as C-reactive protein (CRP), erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) and disease activity indices were examined at each visit, respectively. Drug-induced neutralizing antibodies, as well as drug bioavailability in patients treated with adalimumab, were examined by ELISA.Results:Drug-induced neutralizing antibodies to adalimumab were detected in 11.57% of patients at 6 month, in 17.64% of patients at 12 month, and 24.8% at 24 month. Drug-induced neutralizing antibodies to etanercept were not detected at 6 months, at 7.77% at 12 months, at 9.63% of patients at 24 months. Of the adalimumab patients who were having drug-induced antibodies, 92.59% had low drug bioavailability, while the remaining 7.41% of patients showed normal drug bioavailability despite the presence of drug-induced neutralizing antibodies. In terms of worsening of the disease activity, a positive correlation was found with the presence of drug antibodies - Pearson Correlation = 0.701, p = 0.001. Patients with poor clinical response and available drug antibodies receiving adalimumab were slightly more than those treated with etanercept at 12 and 24 months but the difference is non-significant-U = 0.527, p> 0.05 and U = 0.623, p> 0.05, respectively.Conclusion:Presence of drug-induced neutralizing antibodies in patients treated with adalimumab and etanercept has been associated with poor clinical response and worsening of the patient’s condition. Testing of drug-induced neutralizing antibodies as well as the drug bioavailability of the drug used can be used as reliable biomarkers in clinical rheumatology.References:[1]Benucci M., F.Li Gobbi, M. Meacii et al., “Antidrug antibodies against TNF-blocking agents: correlations between disese activity, hypersensitivity reactions, and different classes of immunoglobulins”, Biologics and Targets and Therapy, 2015: 9 7 -2.[2]Chen D., Y. Chen, W. Tsai et al., “ Significant associations of antidrug antibody levels with serum drug trough levels and therapeutic response of adalimumab and etanercept treatment in rheumatoid arthritis”, Ann Rheum Dis. 2015 Mar; 74 (3).[3]Kalden J. and H. Schulze-Koops, “ Immunogenicity and loss of response to TNF inhibitors: implications for rheumatoid arthritis treatment ”, Nature Reviews Rheumatology, 2017 volume 13, 707–718.[4]Wolf-Henning Boehnck, N. Brembilla, “ Immunogenicity of biological therapies: causes and consequences, ” Expert Review of Clinical Immunology, Vol 14, 2018, Issue 6, 513-523Disclosure of Interests:None declared


1978 ◽  
Vol 12 (4) ◽  
pp. 226-229 ◽  
Author(s):  
Janice M. Williams ◽  
Nicholas G. Popovich

Testicular carcinoma is a leading cause of cancer-related deaths in adult males between the ages of 20 and 35. Cis-Diamminedichloroplatinum (II) (i.e., CDDP) is currently being used investigatively in combination chemotherapy for the treatment of this disease. This article reviews the literature to date on CDDP and its application in testicular cancer. Individual CDDP parameters (e.g., chemistry, mechanism of action, effectiveness and clinical use, adverse effects, dosage, administration and distribution) are discussed.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document