Geophysics: Significant time reduction from submission to publication

2006 ◽  
Vol 25 (10) ◽  
pp. 1208-1208
Author(s):  
Yonghe Sun
2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alessandro Mangione ◽  
Elpidio Gravante ◽  
Giuliano Sinibaldi ◽  
Adriano Cianci ◽  
Gianluigi Sala ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Donatella Stocchi ◽  
Giacomo Zinzani ◽  
Andrea Lazzari ◽  
Giuseppe Leo ◽  
Paolo Giovanni Pasquali ◽  
...  

Abstract During the last years, the total number of subsea wells considerably increased thanks to growing investments in the development of deep and ultra-deep water fields. At the end of their producing life, all these wells will need to be decommissioned and permanently plugged and abandoned, so the demand for technologies that will allow to fulfil this task in the respect of the regulations and at the minimum cost gained a lot of momentum. This paper describes a permanent P&A strategy of subsea wells to be carried out with Well Intervention vessel. The study first goes through the operation sequence and available technologies, defining an abandonment approach which is in line with international standards. Identified strategy results into a significant time and cost reduction comparing with traditional subsea wells decommissioning works performed by a floater rig, even maintaining the same level of safety and effectiveness. The study shows that the overall time reduction estimated by using an intervention vessel ranges from 40 to 55%, compared to a conventional rig-based approach, leading the wells abandonment expenditure savings up to 70%. For all those wells where the implementation of an intervention vessel is not guaranteed, there is still room to get time and cost savings of about 5-15% by combining the same riserless technologies with a conventional floater rig.


2008 ◽  
Author(s):  
Suzanne de Treville ◽  
Lenos Trigeorgis ◽  
Benjamin Avanzi

Author(s):  
Jeremy Fantl

This chapter argues for a “Platonic” conception of open-mindedness. Open-mindedness is not simply a matter of being willing to change your mind in response to a counterargument. You have to be willing to change your mind conditional on spending significant time with the argument, finding each step compelling, and being unable to expose a flaw. If you are willing to do this, then you may be open-minded toward the argument provided you also don’t violate various procedural norms and aren’t disposed to allow various affective factors to influence your beliefs (for example, you aren’t willfully ignorant). On this conception, we can explain how it is possible to hold an outright or “full” belief even while being open-minded toward arguments against that belief.


Author(s):  
Jacqueline M. Dewar

Chapter 0 calls for wide participation in the scholarship of teaching and learning (SoTL) by faculty at all types of institutions, including faculty active in traditional research. The chapter provides examples of many well-known scientists, engineers, and mathematicians who eventually devoted significant time and energy to improving education in their disciplinary fields. While acknowledging the difficulty of doing both traditional research and SoTL, it cautions against ruling out the possibility of undertaking a scholarly study of learning simply because of lack of expertise in education research. Numerous benefits that may accrue to instructors who do investigate learning in their own classrooms are described.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document