The common-shot prestack Gaussian beam depth migration in TTI media

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Li Junkang* ◽  
Li Zhenchun ◽  
Min Zhang ◽  
He Wenchang
2013 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
pp. 025013 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jiexiong Cai ◽  
Wubao Fang ◽  
Huazhong Wang

2015 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jidong Yang* ◽  
Jianping Huang ◽  
Xin Wang ◽  
Zhenchun Li

Geophysics ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 72 (3) ◽  
pp. S133-S138 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tianfei Zhu ◽  
Samuel H. Gray ◽  
Daoliu Wang

Gaussian-beam depth migration is a useful alternative to Kirchhoff and wave-equation migrations. It overcomes the limitations of Kirchhoff migration in imaging multipathing arrivals, while retaining its efficiency and its capability of imaging steep dips with turning waves. Extension of this migration method to anisotropic media has, however, been hampered by the difficulties in traditional kinematic and dynamic ray-tracing systems in inhomogeneous, anisotropic media. Formulated in terms of elastic parameters, the traditional anisotropic ray-tracing systems aredifficult to implement and inefficient for computation, especially for the dynamic ray-tracing system. They may also result inambiguity in specifying elastic parameters for a given medium.To overcome these difficulties, we have reformulated the ray-tracing systems in terms of phase velocity.These reformulated systems are simple and especially useful for general transversely isotropic and weak orthorhombic media, because the phase velocities for these two types of media can be computed with simple analytic expressions. These two types of media also represent the majority of anisotropy observed in sedimentary rocks. Based on these newly developed ray-tracing systems, we have extended prestack Gaussian-beam depth migration to general transversely isotropic media. Test results with synthetic data show that our anisotropic, prestack Gaussian-beam migration is accurate and efficient. It produces images superior to those generated by anisotropic, prestack Kirchhoff migration.


Geophysics ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 74 (2) ◽  
pp. S11-S23 ◽  
Author(s):  
Samuel H. Gray ◽  
Norman Bleistein

Gaussian-beam depth migration and related beam migration methods can image multiple arrivals, so they provide an accurate, flexible alternative to conventional single-arrival Kirchhoff migration. Also, they are not subject to the steep-dip limitations of many (so-called wave-equation) methods that use a one-way wave equation in depth to downward-continue wavefields. Previous presentations of Gaussian-beam migration have emphasized its kinematic imaging capabilities without addressing its amplitude fidelity. We offer two true-amplitude versions of Gaussian-beam migration. The first version combines aspects of the classic derivation of prestack Gaussian-beam migration with recent results on true-amplitude wave-equation migration, yields an expression involving a crosscorrelation imaging condition. To provide amplitude-versus-angle (AVA) information, true-amplitude wave-equation migration requires postmigration mapping from lateral distance (between image location and source location) to subsurface opening angle. However, Gaussian-beam migration does not require postmigration mapping to provide AVA data. Instead, the amplitudes and directions of the Gaussian beams provide information that the migration can use to produce AVA gathers as part of the migration process. The second version of true-amplitude Gaussian-beam migration is an expression involving a deconvolution imaging condition, yielding amplitude-variation-with-offset (AVO) information on migrated shot-domain common-image gathers.


2011 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cai Jie‐xiong ◽  
Fang Wu‐bao ◽  
Yang Qin‐yong

2010 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. 143-148 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yu-Bo Yue ◽  
Zhen-Chun Li ◽  
Ping Zhang ◽  
Xue-Feng Zhou ◽  
Ning Qin

2014 ◽  
Author(s):  
Duan XinYi* ◽  
Li Zhen Chun ◽  
Huang JianPing ◽  
Yang ShanShan ◽  
Zhang Qing

Geophysics ◽  
2001 ◽  
Vol 66 (4) ◽  
pp. 1240-1250 ◽  
Author(s):  
N. Ross Hill

Kirchhoff migration is the most popular method of three‐dimensional prestack depth migration because of its flexibility and efficiency. Its effectiveness can become limited, however, when complex velocity structure causes multipathing of seismic energy. An alternative is Gaussian beam migration, which is an extension of Kirchhoff migration that overcomes many of the problems caused by multipathing. Unlike first‐arrival and most‐energetic‐arrival methods, which retain only one traveltime, this alternative method retains most arrivals by the superposition of Gaussian beams. This paper presents a prestack Gaussian beam migration method that operates on common‐offset gathers. The method is efficient because the computation of beam superposition isolates summations that do not depend on the seismic data and evaluates these integrals by considering their saddle points. Gaussian beam migration of the two‐dimensional Marmousi test data set demonstrates the method’s effectiveness for structural imaging in a case where there is multipathing of seismic energy.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document