Unconventional Gas Reservoir Productivity in Australian Proterozoic Rocks — Studies From the McArthur, Beetaloo, Mount Isa and Amadeus

2015 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bruce A. McConachie* ◽  
Peter Stanmore ◽  
Lucas McLean-Hodgson ◽  
Anargul Kushkarina ◽  
Edward Lewis
2016 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-5 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jinxian He ◽  
Xiaoli Zhang ◽  
Li Ma ◽  
Hongchen Wu ◽  
Muhammad Ashraf

<p>There are enormous resources of unconventional gas in coal measures in Ordos Basin. In order to study the geological characteristics of unconventional gas in coal Measures in Ordos Basin, we analyzed and summarized the results of previous studies. Analysis results are found that, the unconventional gas in coal measures is mainly developed in Upper Paleozoic in Eastern Ordos Basin, which including coalbed methane, shale gas and tight sandstone gas. The oil and gas show active in coal, shale and tight sandstone of Upper Paleozoic in Ordos Basin. Coalbed methane reservoir and shale gas reservoir in coal measures belong to “self-generation and self- preservation”, whereas the coal measures tight sandstone gas reservoir belongs to “allogenic and self-preservation”. The forming factors of the three different kinds of gasses reservoir are closely related and uniform. We have the concluded that it will be more scientific and reasonable that the geological reservoir-forming processes of three different kinds of unconventional gas of coal measures are studied as a whole in Ordos Basin, and at a later stage, the research on joint exploration and co-mining for the three types of gasses ought to be carried out.</p>


2009 ◽  
Vol 12 (04) ◽  
pp. 595-609 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shahab Gerami ◽  
Mehran Pooladi-Darvish

Summary Development of natural gas hydrates as an energy resource has gained significant interest during the past decade. Hydrate reservoirs may be found in different geologic settings including deep ocean sediments and arctic areas. Some reservoirs include a free-gas zone beneath the hydrate and such a situation is referred to as a hydrate-capped gas reservoir. Gas production from such a reservoir could result in pressure reduction in the hydrate cap and endothermic decomposition of hydrates. Well testing in conventional reservoirs is used for estimation of reservoir and near-wellbore properties. Drawdown testing in a hydrate-capped gas reservoir needs to account for the effect of gas from decomposing hydrates. This paper presents a 2D (r,z) mathematical model for a constant-rate drawdown test performed in a well completed in the free-gas zone of a hydrate-capped gas reservoir during the earlytime production. Using energy and material balance equations, the effect of endothermic hydrate decomposition appears as an increased compressibility in the resulting governing equation. The solution for the dimensionless wellbore pressure is derived using Laplace and finite Fourier cosine transforms. The solution to the analytical model was compared with a numerical hydrate reservoir simulator across some range of hydrate reservoir parameters. The use of this solution for determination of reservoir properties is demonstrated using a synthetic example. Furthermore, the solution may be used to quantify the contribution of hydrate decomposition on production performance. Introduction In recent years, demands for energy have stimulated the development of unconventional gas resources, which are available in enormous quantities around the world. Gas hydrate as an unconventional gas resource may be found in two geologic settings (Sloan 1991):on land in permafrost regions, andin the ocean sediments of continental margins. During the last decade, extensive efforts consisting of detection of the hydrate-bearing areas, drilling, logging, coring of the intervals, production pilot-testing, and mathematical modeling of hydrate reservoirs have been pursued to evaluate the potential of gas production from these gas-hydrate resources.


2011 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gloria Maria Santos Lucas ◽  
Eliabe Moreira Moura ◽  
Rosangela Zanoni Moreno ◽  
Alex Rodrigues de Andrade

2017 ◽  
Vol 21 (2) ◽  
pp. 267-287 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hamidreza Hamdi ◽  
Ivo Couckuyt ◽  
Mario Costa Sousa ◽  
Tom Dhaene

2012 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yu-Shu Wu ◽  
Cong Wang ◽  
Jianfang Li ◽  
Perapon Fakcharoenphol

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document