3D multiple attenuation and depth imaging of ocean‐bottom seismic data

2007 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joachim Mispel ◽  
Børge Arntsen ◽  
Alexander Kritsky ◽  
Lasse Amundsen ◽  
Mark Thompson ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Seismic Data ◽  
Ocean Bottom ◽  
Depth Imaging ◽  
Multiple Attenuation

3D Multiple Attenuation and Depth Imaging of Ocean Bottom Seismic Data

2008 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Mispel ◽  
B. Arntsen ◽  
A. Kritski ◽  
L. Amundsen ◽  
M. Thompson ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Seismic Data ◽  
Ocean Bottom ◽  
Depth Imaging ◽  
Multiple Attenuation

An optimization of the inverse scattering multiple attenuation method for OBS and VC data

Geophysics ◽  
2002 ◽  
Vol 67 (4) ◽  
pp. 1293-1303 ◽  
Author(s):  
Luc T. Ikelle ◽  
Lasse Amundsen ◽  
Seung Yoo
Keyword(s):  
Free Surface ◽  
Data Storage ◽  
Inverse Scattering ◽  
Water Depth ◽  
Seismic Data ◽  
Computation Time ◽  
Ocean Bottom ◽  
Multiple Attenuation ◽  
Obs Data ◽  
Streamer Data

The inverse scattering multiple attenuation (ISMA) algorithm for ocean‐bottom seismic (OBS) data can be formulated in the form of a series expansion for each of the four components of OBS data. Besides the actual data, which constitute the first term of the series, each of the other terms is computed as a multidimensional convolution of OBS data with streamer data, and aims at removing one specific order of multiples. If the streamer data do not contain free‐surface multiples, we found that the computation of only the second term of the series is needed to predict and remove all orders of multiples, whatever the water depth. As the computation of the various terms of the series is the most expensive part of ISMA, this result can produce significant savings in computation time, even in data storage, as we no longer need to store the various terms of the series. For example, if the streamer data contained free‐surface multiples, OBS seismic data of 6‐s duration, corresponding to a geological model of the subsurface with 250‐m water depth, require the computation of five terms of the series for each of the four components of OBS data. With the new implementation, in which the streamer data do not contain free‐surface multiples, we need the computation of only one term of the series for each component of the OBS data. The saving in CPU time for this particular case is at least fourfold. The estimation of the inverse source signature, which is an essential part of ISMA, also benefits from the reduction of the number of terms needed for the demultiple to two because it becomes a linear inverse problem instead of a nonlinear one. Assuming that the removal of multiple events produces a significant reduction in the energy of the data, the optimization of this problem leads to a stable, noniterative analytic solution. We have also adapted these results to the implementation of ISMA for vertical‐cable (VC) data. This implementation is similar to that for OBS data. The key difference is that the basic model in VC imaging assumes that data consist of receiver ghosts of primaries instead of the primaries themselves. We have used the following property to achieve this goal. The combination of VC data with surface seismic data, which do not contain free‐surface multiples, allows us to predict free‐surface multiples and receiver ghosts as well as the receiver ghosts of primary reflections. However, if the direct wave arrivals are removed from the VC data, this combination will not predict the receiver ghosts of primary reflections. The difference between these two predictions produces data containing only receiver ghosts of primaries.

Using even terms of the scattering series for deghosting and multiple attenuation of ocean‐bottom cable data

Geophysics ◽  
1999 ◽  
Vol 64 (2) ◽  
pp. 579-592 ◽  
Author(s):  
Luc T. Ikelle
Keyword(s):  
Free Surface ◽  
Seismic Data ◽  
Primary Energy ◽  
Ocean Bottom ◽  
Receiver Side ◽  
Direct Wave ◽  
Sea Floor ◽  
Multiple Attenuation ◽  
Marine Surface ◽  
Streamer Data

Inverse scattering multiple attenuation (ISMA) is a method of removing free‐surface multiple energy while preserving primary energy. The other key feature of ISMA is that no knowledge of the subsurface is required in its application. I have adapted this method to multicomponent ocean‐bottom cable data (i.e., to arrays of sea‐floor geophones and hydrophones) by selecting a subseries made of even terms of the current scattering series used in the free‐surface multiple attenuation of conventional marine surface seismic data (streamer data). This subseries approach allows me to remove receiver ghosts (receiver‐side reverberations) and free‐surface multiples (source‐side reverberations) in multicomponent OBC data. I have processed each component separately. As for the streamer case, my OBC version of ISMA preserves primary energy and does not require any knowledge of the subsurface. Moreover, the preprocessing steps of muting for the direct wave and interpolating for missing near offsets are no longer needed. Knowledge of the source signature is still required. The existing ways of satisfying this requirement for streamer data can be used for OBC data without modification. This method differs from the present dual‐field deghosting method used in OBC data processing in that it does not assume a horizontally flat sea floor; nor does it require the knowledge of the acoustic impedance below the sea floor. Furthermore, it attenuates all free‐surface multiples, including receiver ghosts and source‐side reverberations.

Attenuating primaries and free‐surface multiples of vertical cable (VC) data while preserving receiver ghosts of primaries

Geophysics ◽  
2001 ◽  
Vol 66 (3) ◽  
pp. 953-963 ◽  
Author(s):  
Luc T. Ikelle
Keyword(s):  
Free Surface ◽  
Seismic Data ◽  
Ocean Bottom ◽  
Direct Wave ◽  
Sea Floor ◽  
Multiple Attenuation ◽  
Wavefield Separation ◽  
Internal Multiples ◽  
Streamer Data ◽  
Imaging Algorithms

Marine vertical cable (VC) data contain primaries, receiver ghosts, free‐surface multiples, and internal multiples just like towed‐streamer data. However, the imaging of towed‐streamer data is based on primary reflections, while the emerging imaging algorithms of VC data tend to use the receiver ghosts of primary reflections instead of the primaries themselves. I present an algorithm for attenuating primaries, free‐surface multiples, and the receiver ghosts of free‐surface multiples while preserving the receiver ghosts of primaries. My multiple attenuation algorithm of VC data is based on an inverse scattering approach known, which is a predict‐then‐subtract method. It assumes that surface seismic data are available or that they can be computed from VC data after an up/down wavefield separation at the receiver locations (streamer data add to VC data some of the wave paths needed for multiple attenuation). The combination of surface seismic data with VC data allows one to predict free‐surface multiples and receiver ghosts as well as the receiver ghosts of primary reflections. However, if the direct wave arrivals are removed from the VC data, this combination will not predict the receiver ghosts of primary reflections. I use this property to attenuate primaries, free‐surface multiples, and receiver ghosts from VC data, preserving only the receiver ghosts of primaries. This method can be used for multicomponent ocean bottom cable data (i.e., arrays of sea‐floor geophones and hydrophones) without any modification to attenuate primaries, free‐surface multiples, and the receiver ghosts of free‐surface multiples while preserving the receiver ghosts of primaries.

Prestack depth imaging of ocean-bottom node data

Geophysics ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 74 (6) ◽  
pp. WCA57-WCA63 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mathias Alerini ◽  
Bärbel Traub ◽  
Céline Ravaut ◽  
Eric Duveneck
Keyword(s):  
Real Data ◽  
Velocity Model ◽  
Quality Data ◽  
Ocean Bottom ◽  
Model Estimation ◽  
Data Set ◽  
Depth Imaging ◽  
The North ◽  
Multiple Attenuation ◽  
The Common

Ocean-bottom node acquisitions provide high-quality data but usually have large distances between the nodes because of cost. This makes the use of conventional processing difficult and has led to relatively little interest in such data for industrial purposes. We have considered a three-step workflow specifically designed for prestack depth imaging of P-waves recorded by ocean-bottom nodes. It consists of multiple attenuation, velocity model estimation, and prestack depth migration. Whereas multiple attenuation and tomography use data in the common-receiver domain, migration is performed in the common-angle domain. One of the main features is the handling of the sparse receiver geometry during velocity model estimation: the reciprocity of the PP-Green’s functions is used to obtain the required tomographic input using only the common-receiver gathers. The tomographic method also provides an estimate of the geologic dip, which is used to limit the migration operator. This provides migrated images free of migration smiles. The workflow contains no additional assumptions compared to those used to process ocean-bottom cable data. We validate the workflow on a 2D line extracted from a 3D real data set acquired in the North Sea. The results show that it is possible to use ocean-bottom data efficiently for prestack depth imaging.

Downward and upward continuation of 2-D seismic data to eliminate ocean bottom topography’s effect

2010 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. 149-157 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xiang-Chun Wang ◽  
Chang-Liang Xia ◽  
Xue-Wei Liu
Keyword(s):  
Seismic Data ◽  
Ocean Bottom ◽  
Upward Continuation

Acquire Ocean Bottom Seismic Data and Time-Lapse Geochemistry Data Simultaneously to Identify Compartmentalization and Map Hydrocarbon Movement

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rick Schrynemeeckers
Keyword(s):  
High Resolution ◽  
Seismic Data ◽  
Time Lapse ◽  
Field Trials ◽  
Detection Methods ◽  
Ocean Bottom ◽  
Field Development ◽  
Dense Grid ◽  
Hydrocarbon Charge ◽  
Sweet Spots

Abstract Current offshore hydrocarbon detection methods employ vessels to collect cores along transects over structures defined by seismic imaging which are then analyzed by standard geochemical methods. Due to the cost of core collection, the sample density over these structures is often insufficient to map hydrocarbon accumulation boundaries. Traditional offshore geochemical methods cannot define reservoir sweet spots (i.e. areas of enhanced porosity, pressure, or net pay thickness) or measure light oil or gas condensate in the C7 – C15 carbon range. Thus, conventional geochemical methods are limited in their ability to help optimize offshore field development production. The capability to attach ultrasensitive geochemical modules to Ocean Bottom Seismic (OBS) nodes provides a new capability to the industry which allows these modules to be deployed in very dense grid patterns that provide extensive coverage both on structure and off structure. Thus, both high resolution seismic data and high-resolution hydrocarbon data can be captured simultaneously. Field trials were performed in offshore Ghana. The trial was not intended to duplicate normal field operations, but rather provide a pilot study to assess the viability of passive hydrocarbon modules to function properly in real world conditions in deep waters at elevated pressures. Water depth for the pilot survey ranged from 1500 – 1700 meters. Positive thermogenic signatures were detected in the Gabon samples. A baseline (i.e. non-thermogenic) signature was also detected. The results indicated the positive signatures were thermogenic and could easily be differentiated from baseline or non-thermogenic signatures. The ability to deploy geochemical modules with OBS nodes for reoccurring surveys in repetitive locations provides the ability to map the movement of hydrocarbons over time as well as discern depletion affects (i.e. time lapse geochemistry). The combined technologies will also be able to: Identify compartmentalization, maximize production and profitability by mapping reservoir sweet spots (i.e. areas of higher porosity, pressure, & hydrocarbon richness), rank prospects, reduce risk by identifying poor prospectivity areas, accurately map hydrocarbon charge in pre-salt sequences, augment seismic data in highly thrusted and faulted areas.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document