scholarly journals Continuous active-source seismic monitoring of C O2 injection in a brine aquifer

Geophysics ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 72 (5) ◽  
pp. A57-A61 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas M. Daley ◽  
Ray D. Solbau ◽  
Jonathan B. Ajo-Franklin ◽  
Sally M. Benson

Continuous crosswell seismic monitoring of a small-scale [Formula: see text] injection was accomplished with the development of a novel tubing-deployed piezoelectric borehole source. This piezotube source was deployed on the [Formula: see text] injection tubing, near the top of the saline aquifer reservoir at [Formula: see text] depth, and allowed acquisition of crosswell recordings at [Formula: see text] intervals during the multiday injection. The change in traveltime recorded at various depths in a nearby observation well allowed hour-by-hour monitoring of the growing [Formula: see text] plume via the induced seismic velocity change. Traveltime changes of [Formula: see text] (up to 8%) were observed, with no change seen at control sensors placed above the reservoir. The traveltime measurements indicate that the [Formula: see text] plume reached the top of the reservoir sand before reaching the observation well, where regular fluid sampling was occuring during the injection, thus providing information about the in situ buoyancy of [Formula: see text].

2014 ◽  
Vol 119 (10) ◽  
pp. 7654-7666 ◽  
Author(s):  
Diane Rivet ◽  
Florent Brenguier ◽  
Daniel Clarke ◽  
Nikolaï M. Shapiro ◽  
Aline Peltier

2012 ◽  
Vol 117 (B12) ◽  
pp. n/a-n/a ◽  
Author(s):  
Tomotake Ueno ◽  
Tatsuhiko Saito ◽  
Katsuhiko Shiomi ◽  
Bogdan Enescu ◽  
Hitoshi Hirose ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
pp. 29-36
Author(s):  
Junhwan Choi ◽  
Jaewook Lee ◽  
Joongmoo Byun ◽  
Bona Kim ◽  
Soyoung Kim

2012 ◽  
Vol 39 (9) ◽  
pp. n/a-n/a ◽  
Author(s):  
Shohei Minato ◽  
Takeshi Tsuji ◽  
Shiro Ohmi ◽  
Toshifumi Matsuoka

Geophysics ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 82 (5) ◽  
pp. D319-D326 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pierpaolo Marchesini ◽  
Jonathan B. Ajo-Franklin ◽  
Thomas M. Daley

The ability to characterize time-varying reservoir properties, such as the state of stress, has fundamental implications in subsurface engineering, relevant to geologic sequestration of [Formula: see text]. Stress variation, here in the form of changes in pore fluid pressure, is one factor known to affect seismic velocity. Induced variations in velocity have been used in seismic studies to determine and monitor changes in the stress state. Previous studies conducted to determine velocity-stress sensitivity at reservoir conditions rely primarily on laboratory measurements of core samples or theoretical relationships. We have developed a novel field-scale experiment designed to study the in situ relationship between pore-fluid pressure and seismic velocity using a crosswell continuous active-source seismic monitoring (CASSM) system. At the Cranfield, Mississippi, [Formula: see text] sequestration field site, we actively monitored seismic response for five days with a temporal resolution of 5 min; the target was a 26 m thick injection zone at approximately 3.2 km depth in a fluvial sandstone formation (lower Tuscaloosa Formation). The variation of pore fluid pressure was obtained during discrete events of fluid withdrawal from one of the two wells and monitored with downhole pressure sensors. The results indicate a correlation between decreasing CASSM time delay (i.e., velocity change for a raypath in the reservoir) and periods of reduced fluid pore pressure. The correlation is interpreted as the velocity-stress sensitivity measured in the reservoir. This observation is consistent with published laboratory studies documenting a velocity ([Formula: see text]) increase with an effective stress increase. A traveltime change ([Formula: see text]) of 0.036 ms is measured as the consequence of a change in pressure of approximately 2.55 MPa ([Formula: see text]). For [Formula: see text] total traveltime, the velocity-stress sensitivity is [Formula: see text]. The overall results suggest that CASSM measurements represent a valid technique for in situ determination of velocity-stress sensitivity in field-scale monitoring studies.


2016 ◽  
Vol 205 (3) ◽  
pp. 1926-1936 ◽  
Author(s):  
E. Daskalakis ◽  
C.P. Evangelidis ◽  
J. Garnier ◽  
N.S. Melis ◽  
G. Papanicolaou ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document