Magnetic interpretation in 3‐D using Euler deconvolution

1988 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alan B. Reid ◽  
Jennifer M. Allsop ◽  
Harold Granser ◽  
Anthony J. Millet ◽  
Ian W. Somerton
Keyword(s):  
Euler Deconvolution ◽  
Magnetic Interpretation

To: “Magnetic interpretation in three dimensions using Euler deconvolution,” by A. B. Reid, J. M. Allsop, H. Granser, A. J. Millett, and I. W. Somerton (GEOPHYSICS, p. 80–91, January 1990)

Geophysics ◽  
1990 ◽  
Vol 55 (4) ◽  
pp. 502-502
Keyword(s):  
Three Dimensions ◽  
Euler Deconvolution ◽  
Magnetic Interpretation

Please note that Figures 3 (p. 85) and 5 (p. 87) are not identified. The misplaced captions appear at the bottom of pages 86 and 88, respectively.

The midpoint method: Magnetic interpretation of dikes and faults

Geophysics ◽  
1985 ◽  
Vol 50 (5) ◽  
pp. 834-839 ◽  
Author(s):  
I. V. Radhakrishna Murthy
Keyword(s):  
Characteristic Point ◽  
The Other ◽  
Magnetic Interpretation ◽  
Midpoint Method ◽  
Vertical Gradients

A method of magnetic interpretation of arbitrarily magnetized dikes and faults is developed, based on the properties of a new characteristic point called the “midpoint.” Anomaly profiles at two levels are considered, the maximum and minimum anomalies on them are located, and their midpoints are plotted. The rate of shift of the midpoint with elevation is a measure of the direction of magnetization. The distances between the points of maximum and minimum anomalies and the ratio of horizontal to vertical gradients in the case of faults are used to calculate the other parameters. I also suggest application of the method to anomalies of sheet‐like bodies.

New discrimination techniques for Euler deconvolution

2004 ◽  
Vol 30 (5) ◽  
pp. 461-469 ◽  
Author(s):  
Desmond FitzGerald ◽  
Alan Reid ◽  
Philip McInerney
Keyword(s):  
Euler Deconvolution

Magnetic interpretation of the Robinson–Schensted–Knuth algorithm

2004 ◽  
Vol 102 (11-12) ◽  
pp. 1279-1284 ◽  
Author(s):  
T. Lulek ◽  
P. Jakubczyk ◽  
D. Jakubczyk*
Keyword(s):  
Magnetic Interpretation

scholarly journals Combination of Tilt-Angle and Euler Deconvolution Approaches to Determine Structural Features from Aeromagnetic Data Modeling over Akonolinga-Loum Area (Centre-East, Cameroon)

2017 ◽  
Vol 08 (07) ◽  
pp. 925-947 ◽  
Author(s):  
Justine Yandjimain ◽  
Théophile Ndougsa-Mbarga ◽  
Arsène Meying ◽  
Marcelin Bikoro Bi-Alou ◽  
Paul Claude Ngoumou ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Tilt Angle ◽  
Data Modeling ◽  
Structural Features ◽  
Aeromagnetic Data ◽  
Euler Deconvolution

The Use of Euler Deconvolution Technique in the Estimation of Depth to Magnetic Source Bodies around the Schist Belt Parts of Kano State, Nigeria

2021 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
pp. 19-23
Keyword(s):  
Depth Estimation ◽  
Magnetic Survey ◽  
Schist Belt ◽  
Euler Deconvolution ◽  
Depth Estimate ◽  
Paper Detail ◽  
Magnetic Source ◽  
Deconvolution Technique ◽  
Proton Precession Magnetometer ◽  
Ground Magnetic

Abstract: Depth estimation of magnetic source bodies in parts of the Schist Belt of Kano, using Euler Deconvolution is presented in this paper. Detail ground magnetic survey was carried out using SCINTREX proton precession magnetometer to produce the Total Magnetic Intensity (TMI) map and consequently the residual map. The TMI ranges from 34,261 nT to 34,365 nT, while the residual field ranges from -160 nT to 115 nT. The depth estimate for contacts ranges from 6.5 m to 39.8 m, while that of dyke ranges from 8.9 m to 51.3 m. The depth estimation presented in this work is compared with the results of aeromagnetic study carried out in the same area and found to agree fairly well. Further, this also ensures the validity of aeromagnetic investigation in such applications. Keywords: Contacts, Dykes, Euler Deconvolution, Schist Belt. PACS: 91.25.F and 91.25.Rt.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document