Temperature dependence of electrical resistivity of water‐saturated rocks

1987 ◽  
Author(s):  
Francisco J. Llera ◽  
Motoyuki Sato ◽  
Katsuto Nakatsuka ◽  
Hidekichi Yokoyama
Geophysics ◽  
1991 ◽  
Vol 56 (6) ◽  
pp. 884-884
Author(s):  
Hilton B. Evans

Perhaps I missed something in this paper by Llera et al., but the data presented in their Table 1, their saturating fluid resistivity and Archie’s relationship [their equation (1)] do not seem to be consistent. For example, the authors give the saturating solution resistivity [Formula: see text] to be 70 Ω⋅m at 20° C, which is about 60 Ω⋅m at 30° C using the plots of Figure 4, p. 580; and on p. 582, the authors suggest a value of m = 2.0 for the cementation exponent. Sample 1 in Table 1 gives the rock resistivity (ρϕ) at 30° C to be 30 Ω⋅m and the porosity (ϕ) is 4.5 percent; then, using the Archie relationship, we would expect one of the following if a = 1.0.


2014 ◽  
Vol 5 (3) ◽  
pp. 982-992 ◽  
Author(s):  
M AL-Jalali

Resistivity temperature – dependence and residual resistivity concentration-dependence in pure noble metals(Cu, Ag, Au) have been studied at low temperatures. Dominations of electron – dislocation and impurity, electron-electron, and electron-phonon scattering were analyzed, contribution of these mechanisms to resistivity were discussed, taking into consideration existing theoretical models and available experimental data, where some new results and ideas were investigated.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document