Reservoir simulation in time‐lapse (4D) seismic analysis

1997 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paul J. Hicks ◽  
Zhiyuan Cai
2021 ◽  
pp. 1-59
Author(s):  
Marwa Hussein ◽  
Robert R. Stewart ◽  
Deborah Sacrey ◽  
David H. Johnston ◽  
Jonny Wu

Time-lapse (4D) seismic analysis plays a vital role in reservoir management and reservoir simulation model updates. However, 4D seismic data are subject to interference and tuning effects. Being able to resolve and monitor thin reservoirs of different quality can aid in optimizing infill drilling or locating bypassed hydrocarbons. Using 4D seismic data from the Maui field in the offshore Taranaki basin of New Zealand, we generate typical seismic attributes sensitive to reservoir thickness and rock properties. We find that spectral instantaneous attributes extracted from time-lapse seismic data illuminate more detailed reservoir features compared to those same attributes computed on broadband seismic data. We develop an unsupervised machine learning workflow that enables us to combine eight spectral instantaneous seismic attributes into single classification volumes for the baseline and monitor surveys using self-organizing maps (SOM). Changes in the SOM natural clusters between the baseline and monitor surveys suggest production-related changes that are caused primarily by water replacing gas as the reservoir is being swept under a strong water drive. The classification volumes also facilitate monitoring water saturation changes within thin reservoirs (ranging from very good to poor quality) as well as illuminating thin baffles. Thus, these SOM classification volumes show internal reservoir heterogeneity that can be incorporated into reservoir simulation models. Using meaningful SOM clusters, geobodies are generated for the baseline and monitor SOM classifications. The recoverable gas reserves for those geobodies are then computed and compared to production data. The SOM classifications of the Maui 4D seismic data seems to be sensitive to water saturation change and subtle pressure depletions due to gas production under a strong water drive.


2018 ◽  
Vol 6 (3) ◽  
pp. T601-T611
Author(s):  
Juliana Maia Carvalho dos Santos ◽  
Alessandra Davolio ◽  
Denis Jose Schiozer ◽  
Colin MacBeth

Time-lapse (or 4D) seismic attributes are extensively used as inputs to history matching workflows. However, this integration can potentially bring problems if performed incorrectly. Some of the uncertainties regarding seismic acquisition, processing, and interpretation can be inadvertently incorporated into the reservoir simulation model yielding an erroneous production forecast. Very often, the information provided by 4D seismic can be noisy or ambiguous. For this reason, it is necessary to estimate the level of confidence on the data prior to its transfer to the simulation model process. The methodology presented in this paper aims to diagnose which information from 4D seismic that we are confident enough to include in the model. Two passes of seismic interpretation are proposed: the first, intended to understand the character and quality of the seismic data and, the second, to compare the simulation-to-seismic synthetic response with the observed seismic signal. The methodology is applied to the Norne field benchmark case in which we find several examples of inconsistencies between the synthetic and real responses and we evaluate whether these are caused by a simulation model inaccuracy or by uncertainties in the actual observed seismic. After a careful qualitative and semiquantitative analysis, the confidence level of the interpretation is determined. Simulation model updates can be suggested according to the outcome from this analysis. The main contribution of this work is to introduce a diagnostic step that classifies the seismic interpretation reliability considering the uncertainties inherent in these data. The results indicate that a medium to high interpretation confidence can be achieved even for poorly repeated data.


Geophysics ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 74 (2) ◽  
pp. O17-O28 ◽  
Author(s):  
Amir Ghaderi ◽  
Martin Landrø

In this study, we bring together the two main categories of time-lapse seismic analysis — amplitude analysis and time-shift analysis — to estimate simultaneously the changes in thickness and velocity of a 4D seismic anomaly. The methodology is applied to time-lapse seismic monitoring of carbon dioxide [Formula: see text] storage at Sleipner field, Norway, that shows significant 4D effects. The 4D anomalies resulting from [Formula: see text] injection appear as a multilayer reflection pattern within the relatively shallow Utsira Sand. This multireflective appearance within the sand layer is interpreted as [Formula: see text] layers trapped below thin shale layers. Because most of the [Formula: see text] layers are believed to be thin [Formula: see text], the interference between top and base of these layers needs to be taken into account in 4D seismic analysis. By studying the reflected event from a horizon below the Utsira Sand, we estimate 4D traveltime shifts caused by the presence of the [Formula: see text] layer above thishorizon. We then combine these traveltime shifts with measured amplitude changes for the top and base of the [Formula: see text] layer to estimate velocity and thickness changes for the thin [Formula: see text] layer. In 1999, after three years of injection, the most likely velocity change was around [Formula: see text] and the thickness of the [Formula: see text] layer was around [Formula: see text]. In 2001, the corresponding velocity change and thickness estimates were [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text], respectively. Finally, in 2002, the most likely velocity change was [Formula: see text] and the thickness of the [Formula: see text] layer was [Formula: see text]. It is not straightforward to apply this method to a stack of [Formula: see text] layers because 4D time shifts below the Utsira Sand only provide information about the average time shift for all layers. The amplitude information for each individual [Formula: see text] layer cannot be resolved without knowing the velocity change within each layer. However, our result from a single [Formula: see text] layer may be used to constrain the velocity changes for the multilayer [Formula: see text] case.


2020 ◽  
Vol 224 (3) ◽  
pp. 1670-1683
Author(s):  
Liming Zhao ◽  
Genyang Tang ◽  
Chao Sun ◽  
Jianguo Zhao ◽  
Shangxu Wang

SUMMARY We conducted stress–strain oscillation experiments on dry and partially oil-saturated Fontainebleau sandstone samples over the 1–2000 Hz band at different confining pressures to investigate the wave-induced fluid flow (WIFF) at mesoscopic and microscopic scales and their interaction. Three tested rock samples have similar porosity between 6 and 7 per cent and were partially saturated to different degrees with different oils. The measurement results exhibit a single or two attenuation peaks that are affected by the saturation degree, oil viscosity and confining pressure. One peak, exhibited by all samples, shifts to lower frequencies with increasing pressure, and is mainly attributed to grain contact- or microcrack-related squirt flow based on modelling of its characteristics and comparison with other experiment results for sandstones. The other peak is present at smaller frequencies and shifts to higher frequencies as the confining pressure increases, showing an opposite pressure dependence. This contrast is interpreted as the result of fluid flow patterns at different scales. We developed a dual-scale fluid flow model by incorporating the squirt flow effect into the patchy saturation model, which accounts for the interaction of WIFFs at microscopic and mesoscopic scales. This model provides a reasonable interpretation of the measurement results. Our broad-frequency-band measurements give physical evidence of WIFFs co-existing at two different scales, and combining with modelling results, it suggests that the WIFF mechanisms, related to pore microstructure and fluid distribution, interplay with each other and jointly control seismic attenuation and dispersion at reservoir conditions. These observations and modelling results are useful for quantitative seismic interpretation and reservoir characterization, specifically they have potential applications in time-lapse seismic analysis, fluid prediction and reservoir monitoring.


2006 ◽  
Vol 54 (1) ◽  
pp. 63-73 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stephen A. Hall ◽  
Colin MacBeth ◽  
Jan Stammeijer ◽  
Mark Omerod

2016 ◽  
Vol 19 (03) ◽  
pp. 391-402
Author(s):  
Sunday Amoyedo ◽  
Emmanuel Ekut ◽  
Rasaki Salami ◽  
Liliana Goncalves-Ferreira ◽  
Pascal Desegaulx

Summary This paper presents case studies focused on the interpretation and integration of seismic reservoir monitoring from several fields in conventional offshore and deepwater Niger Delta. The fields are characterized by different geological settings and development-maturity stages. We show different applications varying from qualitative to quantitative use of time-lapse (4D) seismic information. In the first case study, which is in shallow water, the field has specific reservoir-development challenges, simple geology, and is in phased development. On this field, 4D seismic, which was acquired several years ago, is characterized by poor seismic repeatability. Nevertheless, we show that because of improvements from seismic reprocessing, 4D seismic makes qualitative contributions to the ongoing field development. In the second case study, the field is characterized by complex geological settings. The 4D seismic is affected by overburden with strong lateral variations in velocity and steeply dipping structure (up to 40°). Prestack-depth-imaging (PSDM) 4D seismic is used in a more-qualitative manner to monitor gas injection, validate the geologic/reservoir models, optimize infill injector placement, and consequently, enhance field-development economics. The third case study presents a deep offshore field characterized by a complex depositional system for some reservoirs. In this example, good 4D-seismic repeatability (sum of source- and receiver-placement differences between surveys, dS+dR) is achieved, leading to an increased quantitative use of 4D monitoring for the assessment of sand/sand communication, mapping of oil/water (OWC) front, pressure evolution, and dynamic calibration of petro-elastic model (PEM), and also as a seismic-based production-logging tool. In addition, 4D seismic is used to update seismic interpretation, provide a better understanding of internal architecture of the reservoirs units, and, thereby, yield a more-robust reservoir model. The 4D seismic in this field is a key tool for field-development optimization and reservoir management. The last case study illustrates the need for seismic-feasibility studies to detect 4D responses related to production. In addition to assessing the impact of the field environment on the 4D- seismic signal, these studies also help in choosing the optimum seismic-survey type, design, and acquisition parameters. These studies would possibly lead to the adoption of new technologies such as broad-band streamer or nodes acquisition in the near future.


Author(s):  
A. Ogbamikhumi ◽  
T. Tralagba ◽  
E. E. Osagiede

Field ‘K’ is a mature field in the coastal swamp onshore Niger delta, which has been producing since 1960. As a huge producing field with some potential for further sustainable production, field monitoring is therefore important in the identification of areas of unproduced hydrocarbon. This can be achieved by comparing production data with the corresponding changes in acoustic impedance observed in the maps generated from base survey (initial 3D seismic) and monitor seismic survey (4D seismic) across the field. This will enable the 4D seismic data set to be used for mapping reservoir details such as advancing water front and un-swept zones. The availability of good quality onshore time-lapse seismic data for Field ‘K’ acquired in 1987 and 2002 provided the opportunity to evaluate the effect of changes in reservoir fluid saturations on time-lapse amplitudes. Rock physics modelling and fluid substitution studies on well logs were carried out, and acoustic impedance change in the reservoir was estimated to be in the range of 0.25% to about 8%. Changes in reservoir fluid saturations were confirmed with time-lapse amplitudes within the crest area of the reservoir structure where reservoir porosity is 0.25%. In this paper, we demonstrated the use of repeat Seismic to delineate swept zones and areas hit with water override in a producing onshore reservoir.


Author(s):  
Juliana Santos ◽  
Daiane Rossi Rosa ◽  
Denis José Schiozer ◽  
Alessandra Davolio

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document