Seismic refraction signatures for massive sulfide ore bodies

1982 ◽  
Author(s):  
Laric V. Hawkins ◽  
Robert J. Whiteley
Geophysics ◽  
1992 ◽  
Vol 57 (5) ◽  
pp. 736-744 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. J. Maher

In the Okiep District early miners produced massive sulfide ore from some five deposits. Some of these deposits later contributed to the reserves of disseminated ore mined during modern times. It is unreasonable to assume that all of the massive sulfide bodies present within the area are intersected by the erosion surface and thus were discovered by the early miners. Consequently, blind massive sulfide ore bodies could be present and may have large quantities of disseminated ore associated with them. The transient electromagnetic method is ideally suited to exploring for massive sulfide bodies, and six test surveys were carried out at various sites in the district. Four of these surveys were unsuccessful whereas, at the remaining two sites, excellent anomalies were recorded. At Ezelsfontein East Extension an anomaly was recorded indicative of a massive sulfide body at shallow depth and of generally flat attitude. This anomaly has a time constant of 15 ms and the interpreted body was confirmed by a limited diamond drilling program. A deep, flat‐lying conductor was interpreted from the TEM results at Fonteintjie West Prospect. This anomaly, with a time constant of 0.6 ms, has limited size. Diamond drilling confirmed the presence of submassive to massive sulfide mineralization at this locale. Neither of these two drilled prospects had economic mineralization.


Geophysics ◽  
2000 ◽  
Vol 65 (6) ◽  
pp. 1900-1907 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joe Wong

Crosshole seismic instrumentation based on a piezoelectric source and hydrophone detectors were used to gather seismograms between boreholes at the McConnell orebody near Sudbury, Ontario. High‐frequency seismograms were recorded across rock sections 50 to 100 m wide containing a continuous zone of massive sulfide ore. First‐arrival traveltimes obtained from a detailed scan were used to create a P-wave velocity tomogram that clearly delineated the ore zone. Refraction ray tracing on a discrete layer model confirmed the main features of the tomogram. The survey demonstrated that it is possible to conduct cost‐effective, high‐resolution crosshole seismic surveys to delineate ore bodies on a scale useful for planning mining operations.


2015 ◽  
Vol 32 (3) ◽  
pp. 161-169 ◽  
Author(s):  
H. Abdollahi ◽  
P. Karimi ◽  
A. Amini ◽  
A. Akcil
Keyword(s):  

Geophysics ◽  
1952 ◽  
Vol 17 (3) ◽  
pp. 505-530 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. Woodward Moore

Of the several geophysical methods used in exploration for oil and useful ore bodies, the earth‐resistivity and seismic‐refraction tests have been found to be the most adaptable to the shallow tests generally required in highway construction work. Of these, the earth‐resistivity test is the faster and has a wider range of application to highway problems than does the seismic test. Use of both methods of tests in subsurface explorations for engineering structures is expanding. The paper cites a growing need for a more thorough subsurface investigation of all engineering structure sites and gives examples of field data obtained by the Bureau of Public Roads when making preliminary geophysical surveys of proposed highway locations or structure sites. The economic aspects and the advantages and limitations of the two methods of test are discussed with particular reference to their application to highway engineering problems.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document