PS‐wave conversion‐point equation in layered anisotropic media

Author(s):  
Jianxin Yuan ◽  
Xiang‐Yang Li
2004 ◽  
Vol 56 (3) ◽  
pp. 155-163 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fredy A.V. Artola ◽  
Ricardo Leiderman ◽  
Sergio A.B. Fontoura ◽  
Mércia B.C. Silva

2006 ◽  
Vol 24 (3) ◽  
pp. 375-381
Author(s):  
Fredy A.V. Artola ◽  
Sergio A.B. Fontoura ◽  
Ricardo Leiderman ◽  
Jorge F.F. Sobreira

2003 ◽  
Author(s):  
S.A.B. Da Fontoura ◽  
F.A.V. Artola ◽  
R. Leiderman ◽  
M.B.C. Silva

2007 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jianxin Jerry Yuan ◽  
Genmeng Chen ◽  
Alex Calvert ◽  
Robert Bloor

Geophysics ◽  
2003 ◽  
Vol 68 (1) ◽  
pp. 210-224 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mirko van der Baan ◽  
J.‐Michael Kendall

Anisotropy influences many aspects of seismic wave propagation and, therefore, has implications for conventional processing schemes. It also holds information about the nature of the medium. To estimate anisotropy, we need both forward modeling and inversion tools. Forward modeling in anisotropic media is generally done by ray tracing. We present a new and fast method using the τ‐p transform to calculate exact reflection‐moveout curves in stratified, laterally homogeneous, anisotropic media for all pure‐mode and converted phases which requires no conventional ray tracing. Moreover, we obtain the common conversion points for both P‐SV and P‐SH converted waves. Results are exact for arbitrary strength of anisotropy in both HTI and VTI media (transverse isotropy with a horizontal or vertical symmetry axis, respectively). Since inversion for anisotropic parameters is a highly nonunique problem, we also develop expressions describing the phase velocities that require only a reduced number of parameters for both types of anisotropy. Nevertheless, resulting predictions for traveltimes and conversion points are generally more accurate than those obtained using the conventional Taylor‐series expansions. In addition, the reduced‐parameter expressions are also able to handle kinks or cusps in the SV traveltime curves for either VTI or HTI symmetry.


2007 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yi‐Jiun Tang ◽  
Kuei‐Chun Yang ◽  
Young‐Fo Chang

Geophysics ◽  
1999 ◽  
Vol 64 (3) ◽  
pp. 678-690 ◽  
Author(s):  
Leon Thomsen

Converted‐wave processing is more critically dependent on physical assumptions concerning rock velocities than is pure‐mode processing, because not only moveout but also the offset of the imaged point itself depend upon the physical parameters of the medium. Hence, unrealistic assumptions of homogeneity and isotropy are more critical than for pure‐mode propagation, where the image‐point offset is determined geometrically rather than physically. In layered anisotropic media, an effective velocity ratio [Formula: see text] (where [Formula: see text] is the ratio of average vertical velocities and γ2 is the corresponding ratio of short‐spread moveout velocities) governs most of the behavior of the conversion‐point offset. These ratios can be constructed from P-wave and converted‐wave data if an approximate correlation is established between corresponding reflection events. Acquisition designs based naively on γ0 instead of [Formula: see text] can result in suboptimal data collection. Computer programs that implement algorithms for isotropic homogeneous media can be forced to treat layered anisotropic media, sometimes with good precision, with the simple provision of [Formula: see text] as input for a velocity ratio function. However, simple closed‐form expressions permit hyperbolic and posthyperbolic moveout removal and computation of conversion‐point offset without these restrictive assumptions. In these equations, vertical traveltime is preferred (over depth) as an independent variable, since the determination of the depth is imprecise in the presence of polar anisotropy and may be postponed until later in the flow. If the subsurface has lateral variability and/or azimuthal anisotropy, then the converted‐wave data are not invariant under the exchange of source and receiver positions; hence, a split‐spread gather may have asymmetric moveout. Particularly in 3-D surveys, ignoring this diodic feature of the converted‐wave velocity field may lead to imaging errors.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document