3D surface multiple prediction using sparse inversion

Author(s):  
E. J. van Dedem ◽  
D. J. Verschuur
Geophysics ◽  
2005 ◽  
Vol 70 (3) ◽  
pp. V31-V43 ◽  
Author(s):  
E. J. van Dedem ◽  
D. J. Verschuur

The theory of iterative surface-related multiple elimination holds for 2D as well as 3D wavefields. The 3D prediction of surface multiples, however, requires a dense and extended distribution of sources and receivers at the surface. Since current 3D marine acquisition geometries are very sparsely sampled in the crossline direction, the direct Fresnel summation of the multiple contributions, calculated for those surface positions at which a source and a receiver are present, cannot be applied without introducing severe aliasing effects. In this newly proposed method, the regular Fresnel summation is applied to the contributions in the densely sampled inline direction, but the crossline Fresnel summation is replaced with a sparse parametric inversion. With this procedure, 3D multiples can be predicted using the available input data. The proposed method is demonstrated on a 3D synthetic data set as well as on a 3D marine data set from offshore Norway.


Geophysics ◽  
2020 ◽  
pp. 1-62
Author(s):  
Myrna Staring ◽  
Marcin Dukalski ◽  
Mikhail Belonosov ◽  
Rolf Baardman ◽  
Jewoo Yoo ◽  
...  

Suppression of surface-related and internal multiples is an outstanding challenge in seismic data processing. The former is particularly difficult in shallow water, whereas the latter is problematic for targets buried under complex, highly scattering overburdens. We propose a two-step, amplitude- and phase-preserving, inversion-based workflow, which addresses these problems. We apply Robust Estimation of Primaries by Sparse Inversion (R-EPSI) to suppress the surface-related multiples and solve for the source wavelet. A significant advantage of the inversion approach of the R-EPSI method is that it does not rely on an adaptive subtraction step that typically limits other de-multiple methods such as SRME. The resulting Green's function is used as input to a Marchenko equation-based approach to predict the complex interference pattern of all overburden-generated internal multiples at once, without a priori subsurface information. In theory, the interbed multiples can be predicted with correct amplitude and phase and, again, no adaptive filters are required. We illustrate this workflow by applying it on an Arabian Gulf field data example. It is crucial that all pre-processing steps are performed in an amplitude preserving way to restrict any impact on the accuracy of the multiple prediction. In practice, some minor inaccuracies in the processing flow may end up as prediction errors that need to be corrected for. Hence, we decided that the use of conservative adaptive filters is necessary to obtain the best results after interbed multiple removal. The obtained results show promising suppression of both surface-related and interbed multiples.


1999 ◽  
Author(s):  
E. J. van Dedem ◽  
M. A. Schonewille ◽  
D. J. Verschuur

Geophysics ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 75 (5) ◽  
pp. 75A245-75A261 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bill Dragoset ◽  
Eric Verschuur ◽  
Ian Moore ◽  
Richard Bisley

Surface-related multiple elimination (SRME) is an algorithm that predicts all surface multiples by a convolutional process applied to seismic field data. Only minimal preprocessing is required. Once predicted, the multiples are removed from the data by adaptive subtraction. Unlike other methods of multiple attenuation, SRME does not rely on assumptions or knowledge about the subsurface, nor does it use event properties to discriminate between multiples and primaries. In exchange for this “freedom from the subsurface,” SRME requires knowledge of the acquisition wavelet and a dense spatial distribution of sources and receivers. Although a 2D version of SRME sometimes suffices, most field data sets require 3D SRME for accurate multiple prediction. All implementations of 3D SRME face a serious challenge: The sparse spatial distribution of sources and receivers available in typical seismic field data sets does not conform to the algorithmic requirements. There are several approaches to implementing 3D SRME that address the data sparseness problem. Among those approaches are pre-SRME data interpolation, on-the-fly data interpolation, zero-azimuth SRME, and true-azimuth SRME. Field data examples confirm that (1) multiples predicted using true-azimuth 3D SRME are more accurate than those using zero-azimuth 3D SRME and (2) on-the-fly interpolation produces excellent results.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document