A comparison of the inductive‐limit footprints of airborne electromagnetic configurations

Geophysics ◽  
2004 ◽  
Vol 69 (5) ◽  
pp. 1229-1239 ◽  
Author(s):  
James E. Reid ◽  
Julian Vrbancich

An inductive‐limit model has been used to determine footprint sizes for a variety of common airborne electromagnetic‐survey geometries. The model accounts both for variations in the height and orientation of the electromagnetic transmitter, and for electromagnetic coupling between the induced current system and the receiver. Horizontal magnetic‐dipole transmitters are shown to have a smaller footprint than vertical magnetic‐dipole sources. We show that footprint sizes for the vertical coaxial and vertical coplanar geometries are essentially identical, provided the transmitter‐receiver separation is much less than the transmitter height. The inductive‐limit horizontal‐component footprint for a fixed‐wing horizontal‐loop transmitter with a towed‐bird receiver is shown to be two‐thirds of that for the vertical component.

Author(s):  
M G Persova ◽  
Y G Soloveichik ◽  
D V Vagin ◽  
D S Kiselev ◽  
O S Trubacheva ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Oliver Conway-White ◽  
Colby M. Steelman ◽  
Hernan Ugalde ◽  
Adam Smiarowski ◽  
Emmanuelle Arnaud ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 56 (9) ◽  
pp. 1-11
Author(s):  
Shuai Chang ◽  
Ye Lin ◽  
Yahong Rosa Zheng ◽  
Xiaomei Fu

Preview ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 2012 (158) ◽  
pp. 39-42 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marina T. Costelloe ◽  
Ian C. Roach

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
S.C.T. Wong ◽  
I.C. Roach ◽  
M.G. Nicoll ◽  
P.M. English ◽  
M.-A. Bonnardot ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yiyuan He* ◽  
Xuefeng Cao ◽  
Zhanhui Li ◽  
Ziqiang Zhu ◽  
Shengjun Liang ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 56 (69) ◽  
pp. 363-372 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrew R. Mahoney ◽  
Hajo Eicken ◽  
Yasushi Fukamachi ◽  
Kay I. Ohshima ◽  
Daisuke Simizu ◽  
...  

AbstractData from the Seasonal Ice Zone Observing Network (SIZONet) acquired near Barrow, Alaska, during the 2009/10 ice season allow novel comparisons between measurements of ice thickness and velocity. An airborne electromagnetic survey that passed over a moored Ice Profiling Sonar (IPS) provided coincident independent measurements of total ice and snow thickness and ice draft at a scale of 10 km. Once differences in sampling footprint size are accounted for, we reconcile the respective probability distributions and estimate the thickness of level sea ice at 1.48 ± 0.1 m, with a snow depth of 0.12 ± 0.07 m. We also complete what we believe is the first independent validation of radar-derived ice velocities by comparing measurements from a coastal radar with those from an under-ice acoustic Doppler current profiler (ADCP). After applying a median filter to reduce high-frequency scatter in the radar-derived data, we find good agreement with the ADCP bottom-tracked ice velocities. With increasing regulatory and operational needs for sea-ice data, including the number and thickness of pressure ridges, coordinated observing networks such as SIZONet can provide the means of reducing uncertainties inherent in individual datasets.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document