Reply by the author to the Discussion by J. M. Mendel
I thank Professor Mendel for his comments on my paper. I first examine his model of the seismogram and show that losses in the earth cannot be convolutional. I then examine the structure of his “reflectivity sequence” and show that this cannot be random. I suggest that the theory of probability, random variables and stochastic processes is not applicable to our non‐random seismic data. I suggest that we need, and use, a definition of whiteness in geophysics which comes from optics. Finally I show that none of the methods I am proposing for the determination of the source signature relies on the earth being loss‐free.
Keyword(s):
Keyword(s):
Keyword(s):
Keyword(s):
2018 ◽
Vol 99
(9)
◽
pp. 1851-1866
◽
Keyword(s):
1997 ◽
Vol 165
◽
pp. 233-238
◽
2020 ◽
Vol 2020
(9)
◽
pp. 29-33