3-D traveltime computation using second‐order ENO scheme

Geophysics ◽  
1999 ◽  
Vol 64 (6) ◽  
pp. 1867-1876 ◽  
Author(s):  
Seongjai Kim ◽  
Richard Cook

We consider a second‐order finite difference scheme to solve the eikonal equation. Upwind differences are requisite to sharply resolve discontinuities in the traveltime derivatives, whereas centered differences improve the accuracy of the computed traveltime. A second‐order upwind essentially non‐oscillatory (ENO) scheme satisfies these requirements. It is implemented with a dynamic down ’n’ out (DNO) marching, an expanding box approach. To overcome the instability of such an expanding box scheme, the algorithm incorporates an efficient post sweeping (PS), a correction‐by‐iteration method. Near the source, an efficient and accurate mesh‐refinement initialization scheme is suggested for the DNO marching. The resulting algorithm, ENO-DNO-PS, turns out to be unconditionally stable, of second‐order accuracy, and efficient; for various synthetic and real velocity models having large contrasts, two PS iterations produce traveltimes accurate enough to complete the computation.

Author(s):  
C. Chávez ◽  
F. Domíngez ◽  
S. Lucas-Martínez ◽  
J. Tinoco-Martínez ◽  
D. Santana

In this paper, it is presented a formulation of a generalized finite difference scheme to solve the Motz problem. It is based on a general difference scheme defined by an optimality condition, which has been developed to solve Poisson-like equations whose domains are approximated by a wide variety of grids over general regions. Numerical examples showing second-order accuracy of the calculated solutions are presented.


Geophysics ◽  
1992 ◽  
Vol 57 (3) ◽  
pp. 478-487 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fuhao Qin ◽  
Yi Luo ◽  
Kim B. Olsen ◽  
Wenying Cai ◽  
Gerard T. Schuster

We show that a scheme to solve the 2-D eikonal equation by a finite‐difference method can violate causality for moderate to large velocity contrasts [Formula: see text]. As an alternative, we present a finite‐difference scheme in which the solution region progresses outward from an “expanding wavefront” rather than an “expanding square,” and therefore honors causality. Our method appears to be stable and reasonably accurate for a variety of velocity models with moderate to large velocity contrasts. The penalty is a large increase in computational cost and programming effort.


Geophysics ◽  
1991 ◽  
Vol 56 (6) ◽  
pp. 812-821 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. van Trier ◽  
W. W. Symes

Seismic traveltimes can be computed efficiently on a regular grid by an upwind finite‐difference method. The method solves a conservation law that describes changes in the gradient components of the traveltime field. The traveltime field itself is easily obtained from the solution of the conservation law by numerical integration. The conservation law derives from the eikonal equation, and its solution depicts the first‐arrival‐time field. The upwind finite‐difference scheme can be implemented in fully vectorized form, in contrast to a similar scheme proposed recently by Vidale. The resulting traveltime field is useful both in Kirchhoff migration and modeling and in seismic tomography. Many reliable methods exist for the numerical solution of conservation laws, which appear in fluid mechanics as statements of the conservation of mass, momentum, etc. A first‐order upwind finite‐difference scheme proves accurate enough for seismic applications. Upwind schemes are stable because they mimic the behavior of fluid flow by using only information taken from upstream in the fluid. Other common difference schemes are unstable, or overly dissipative, at shocks (discontinuities in flow variables), which are time gradient discontinuities in our approach to solving the eikonal equation.


2016 ◽  
Vol 23 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Givi Berikelashvili ◽  
Bidzina Midodashvili

AbstractWe consider the Dirichlet problem for an elliptic equation with variable coefficients, the solution of which is obtained by means of a finite-difference scheme of second order accuracy. We establish a two-stage finite-difference method for the posed problem and obtain an estimate of the convergence rate consistent with the smoothness of the solution. It is proved that the solution of the corrected scheme converges at rate


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document