Image mispositioning due to dipping TI media: A physical seismic modeling study

Geophysics ◽  
1999 ◽  
Vol 64 (4) ◽  
pp. 1230-1238 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Helen Isaac ◽  
Don C. Lawton

A scaled physical model was constructed to investigate the magnitudes of imaging errors incurred by the use of isotropic processing code when there is seismic velocity anisotropy present in the dipping overburden. The model consists of a block of transversely isotropic (TI) phenolic material with the TI axis of symmetry dipping at an angle of 45°. Its scaled thickness is 1500 m, and it is intended to simulate the dipping clastic sequences found in many fold‐thrust belts. A piece of isotropic Plexiglas, affixed to the underside of the anisotropic block, has a step function in it to simulate a target reef edge or fault. The anisotropy parameters of the material are δ = 0.1 and ε = 0.24. On zero‐offset data the imaged position of the target is shifted laterally 320 m in the updip direction of the beds, whereas on time‐ and depth‐migrated multichannel sections the shift is 300 m. The lateral shift is offset dependent, with the amount of shift in any common‐midpoint gather decreasing from 320 m on the near offsets to 280 m on the far offsets. Prestack depth‐migration velocity analysis based upon obtaining consistent depth images in the common‐offset domain results in the base of the anisotropic section being imaged 50 m (about 3%) too deep.

1977 ◽  
pp. 259-265
Author(s):  
I. A. Turchaninov ◽  
V. I. Panin ◽  
G. A. Markov ◽  
V. I. Pavlovskii ◽  
N. V. Sharov ◽  
...  

Geophysics ◽  
1998 ◽  
Vol 63 (2) ◽  
pp. 392-398 ◽  
Author(s):  
W.-J. Wu ◽  
L. Lines ◽  
A. Burton ◽  
H.-X. Lu ◽  
J. Zhu ◽  
...  

We produce depth images for an Alberta Foothills line by iteratively using a number of migration and velocity analysis techniques. In imaging steeply dipping layers of a foothills data set, it is apparent that thrust belt geology can violate the conventional assumptions of elevation datum corrections and common midpoint (CMP) stacking. To circumvent these problems, we use migration from topography in which we perform prestack depth migration on the data using correct source and receiver elevations. Migration from topography produces enhanced images of steep shallow reflectors when compared to conventional processing. In addition to migration from topography, we couple prestack depth migration with the continuous adjustment of velocity depth models. A number of criteria are used in doing this. These criteria require that our velocity estimates produce a focused image and that migrated depths in common image gathers be independent of source‐receiver offset. Velocity models are estimated by a series of iterative and interpretive steps involving prestack migration velocity analysis and structural interpretation. Overlays of velocity models on depth migrations should generally show consistency between velocity boundaries and reflection depths. Our preferred seismic depth section has been produced by using prestack reverse‐time depth migration coupled with careful geological interpretation.


Geophysics ◽  
2005 ◽  
Vol 70 (3) ◽  
pp. U19-U27 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paul C. Sava ◽  
Biondo Biondi ◽  
John Etgen

We propose a method for estimating interval velocity using the kinematic information in defocused diffractions and reflections. We extract velocity information from defocused migrated events by analyzing their residual focusing in physical space (depth and midpoint) using prestack residual migration. The results of this residual-focusing analysis are fed to a linearized inversion procedure that produces interval velocity updates. Our inversion procedure uses a wavefield-continuation operator linking perturbations of interval velocities to perturbations of migrated images, based on the principles of wave-equation migration velocity analysis introduced in recent years. We measure the accuracy of the migration velocity using a diffraction-focusing criterion instead of the criterion of flatness of migrated common-image gathers that is commonly used in migration velocity analysis. This new criterion enables us to extract velocity information from events that would be challenging to use with conventional velocity analysis methods; thus, our method is a powerful complement to those conventional techniques. We demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed methodology using two examples. In the first example, we estimate interval velocity above a rugose salt top interface by using only the information contained in defocused diffracted and reflected events present in zero-offset data. By comparing the results of full prestack depth migration before and after the velocity updating, we confirm that our analysis of the diffracted events improves the velocity model. In the second example, we estimate the migration velocity function for a 2D, zero-offset, ground-penetrating radar data set. Depth migration after the velocity estimation improves the continuity of reflectors while focusing the diffracted energy.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document