A least‐squares approach to depth determination from self‐potential anomalies caused by horizontal cylinders and spheres

Geophysics ◽  
1997 ◽  
Vol 62 (1) ◽  
pp. 44-48 ◽  
Author(s):  
El‐Sayed Mohamed Abdelrahman ◽  
Sharafeldin Mahmoud Sharafeldin

We have developed a least‐squares approach to depth determination from self‐potential anomalies caused by horizontal cylinders and spheres. By defining the zero‐anomaly distance and the anomaly value at the origin on the profile, the problem of depth determination from self‐potential data has been transformed into finding a solution to a nonlinear equation. Procedures are also formulated to estimate the electric dipole moment and the polarization angle. The error in the depth parameter estimation introduced by data errors was also studied through imposing 1 to 10% errors in the zero‐anomaly distance and the anomaly value at the origin in one synthetic profile caused by a sphere. When the zero‐anomaly distance and the anomaly value at the origin possess errors of equal magnitude and of the same signs, the results will not differ much from the true values. When errors have opposite signs, the maximum error in depth is 10%. Finally, the validity of the method is tested on a field example from Ergani Copper district, Turkey.

Geophysics ◽  
1983 ◽  
Vol 48 (3) ◽  
pp. 357-360 ◽  
Author(s):  
O. P. Gupta

The present paper deals with a numerical approach to determine the depth of a buried structure from the residual anomaly. The problem of depth determination has been transformed into the problem of finding a solution of a nonlinear equation of the form [Formula: see text]. Formulas have been derived for a sphere, vertical and horizontal cylinders, and for a vertical fault (thin plate approximation). The procedure is applied to synthetic data with and without random errors. Finally, a field example is presented in which the depth to a fault is estimated at 3.8 km and verified from drilling results.


2004 ◽  
Vol 161 (2) ◽  
pp. 399-411 ◽  
Author(s):  
E. M. Abdelrahman ◽  
H. S. Saber ◽  
K. S. Essa ◽  
M. A. Fouda

2009 ◽  
Vol 40 (2) ◽  
pp. 214-221 ◽  
Author(s):  
El-Sayed Mohamed Abdelrahman ◽  
Khalid Soliman ◽  
Khalid Sayed Essa ◽  
Eid Ragab Abo-Ezz ◽  
Tarek Mohamed El-Araby

1998 ◽  
Vol 06 (01n02) ◽  
pp. 83-97 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. P. Knobles ◽  
R. A. Koch ◽  
E. K. Westwood ◽  
T. Udagawa

An optimization approach is used to estimate waveguide parameters for selected test cases of the Geoacoustic Benchmark Inversion Workshop held in Vancouver, June 1997. The approach uses multiple acoustic data samples to decouple the original N–dimensional problem into several smaller-dimensional problems. A nonlinear least squares approach is used to estimate parameters in each subset. The estimation of parameters in each subset proceeds until convergence is reached. Predicted values are in good agreement with the true values, which suggests that the decoupling of waveguide parameters allows a nonlinear least squares approach to be an effective tool in the inversion of ocean waveguide parameters.


Geophysics ◽  
1990 ◽  
Vol 55 (3) ◽  
pp. 376-377 ◽  
Author(s):  
El‐Sayed M. Abdelrahman

In the article by Gupta, the problem of depth determination of a buried structure from the residual gravity anomaly has been transformed into a problem of finding the solution of a nonlinear equation of the form f(z) = 0. Gupta begins his formulation of the problem with equation (1) from Mettleton (1942) Eq. (1) [Formula: see text]


1997 ◽  
Vol 150 (1) ◽  
pp. 121-128 ◽  
Author(s):  
E. M. Abdelrahman ◽  
T. M. El-Araby ◽  
A. A. Ammar ◽  
H. I. Hassanein

Geophysics ◽  
1985 ◽  
Vol 50 (2) ◽  
pp. 262-262 ◽  
Author(s):  
El‐Sayed M. Abdelrahman ◽  
Abdel‐Rhim I. Bayoumi ◽  
Yehia A. Amin

In his paper, Gupta was able to transform the problem of depth estimation of buried structures into a problem of finding a solution of a nonlinear equation in the form of [Formula: see text]. Gupta also indicated that such a numerical approach is found to be capable of determining optimum depths particularly from residual anomaly profiles even if small segments of the gravity profiles are observed. No doubt this numerical approach has its point of view both in theory and practice over any other depth estimation techniques such as those defined by the [Formula: see text] rule (Nettleton, 1940, 1942; Telford et al., 1976). However, Gupta’s technique would be much more effective if applied not to residuals but to derivative anomalies, particularly when the regional field has few extrema in it; this is obviously due to the following.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document