Pulse distortion in depth migration

Geophysics ◽  
1994 ◽  
Vol 59 (10) ◽  
pp. 1561-1569 ◽  
Author(s):  
Martin Tygel ◽  
Jörg Schleicher ◽  
Peter Hubral

When migrating seismic primary reflections obtained from arbitrary source‐receiver configurations (e.g., common shot or constant offset) into depth, a pulse distortion occurs along the reflector. This distortion exists even if the migration was performed using the correct velocity model. Regardless of the migration algorithm, this distortion is a consequence of varying reflection angle, reflector dip, and/or velocity variation. The relationship between the original time pulse and the depth pulse after migration can be explained and quantified in terms of a prestack, Kirchhoff‐type, diffraction‐stack migration theory.

Geophysics ◽  
2004 ◽  
Vol 69 (4) ◽  
pp. 1025-1036 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jianguo Sun

The true‐amplitude weight function in 3D limited‐aperture migration is obtained by extending its formula at an actual reflection point to any arbitrary subsurface point. This implies that the recorded seismic signal is a delta impulse. When the weight function is used in depth migration, it results in an amplitude distortion depending on the vertical distance from the target reflector. This distortion exists even if the correct velocity model is used. If the image point lies at a depth shallower than the half‐offset, the distortion cannot be ignored, even for a spatial wavelet having a short length. Using paraxial ray theory, I find a formula for the true‐amplitude weight function causing no amplitude distortion, under the condition that the earth's surface is smoothly curved. However, the formula is reflector dependent. As a result, amplitude distortion, in parallel with pulse distortion, is an intrinsic effect in depth migration, and true‐amplitude migration without amplitude distortion is possible only when the position of the target reflector is known. If this is the case, true‐amplitude migration without amplitude distortion can be realized by filtering the output of a simple unweighted diffraction stack with the weight function presented here. Also, using Taylor expansions with respect to the vertical, I derive an alternative formula for the true‐amplitude weight function that causes no amplitude distortion. Starting from this formula, I show that the previously published reflector‐independent true‐amplitude weight function is a zero‐order approximation to the one given here.


Geophysics ◽  
1999 ◽  
Vol 64 (3) ◽  
pp. 934-941 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kurt J. Marfurt ◽  
Bertrand Duquet

Because of its computational efficiency, prestack Kirchhoff depth migration is currently the method of choice in both 2-D and 3-D imaging of seismic data. The most algorithmically complex component of the Kirchhoff family of algorithms is the calculation and manipulation of accurate traveltime tables for each source and receiver point. Once calculated, we sum the seismic energy over all possible ray paths, allowing us to accurately image both specular and nonspecular scattered energy. Any seismic events that fall within the velocity passband, including reflected and diffracted signal, mode conversions, multiples, head waves, and aliases of surface waves, are imaged in depth. The transformation of time gathers to depth gathers can be quite complicated and nonintuitive to all but the seasoned imaging expert. In particular, easily recognized head‐wave events on common‐shot gathers are often difficult to differentiate from undermigrated coherent reflections on common‐reflection‐point depth gathers. In contrast, subsalt multiples that have propagated along complex ray paths are often easily recognized on common‐offset depth gathers but are indistinguishable from the distorted primaries on the input common‐shot or common‐midpoint time gathers. In a related area, seismic reflection traveltime tomography is currently the workhorse for 2-D and an active area of research and development for 3-D migration‐driven velocity analysis. The objective function for this “velocity inversion” problem is to either minimize the temporal difference between picked and modeled time picks, or to maximize the similarity between, or flatness of, common‐reflection‐point depth picks. Once picked and associated with the correct reflector, time picks never need to be modified during the velocity‐model updating steps that ultimately lead to a feasible solution. In practice, such time picks are nearly impossible to make in those structurally complex areas that justify the use of prestack depth migration. Instead, we almost always use the second objective function and pick reflector events in depth, where we can use our geologic insight to differentiate between signal and noise and where the difficulty of associating a picked event with the velocity/depth model horizon completely disappears. The major drawback of picking in depth is that these events need to be repicked each time any part of the overlying velocity/depth model has been updated. We show that by applying Fermat’s principle, and by reusing the same traveltime tables used in seismic prestack Kirchhoff depth imaging, we can map interpreted events on the depth gathers to corresponding interpreted events on the original time gathers. This technique, first introduced by J. van Trier in 1990, is considerably more stable and, because we reuse the already computed migration traveltime tables, more economic than two‐point ray‐trace methods. In our first application of coherent noise suppression, we show how we can relate imaging artifacts seen on the depth image to their causative coherent noise on the original time gathers. Once identified, these noise events can be safely suppressed using conventional filtering techniques. In our second application of reflection tomography, we show how we can pick partially focused reflectors in depth, and map them back to time, undoing the effect of the incorrect velocity/depth model used in prestack Kirchhoff depth migration such that the events never need to be repicked during subsequent velocity model updates.


Geophysics ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 76 (5) ◽  
pp. WB175-WB182 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yan Huang ◽  
Bing Bai ◽  
Haiyong Quan ◽  
Tony Huang ◽  
Sheng Xu ◽  
...  

The availability of wide-azimuth data and the use of reverse time migration (RTM) have dramatically increased the capabilities of imaging complex subsalt geology. With these improvements, the current obstacle for creating accurate subsalt images now lies in the velocity model. One of the challenges is to generate common image gathers that take full advantage of the additional information provided by wide-azimuth data and the additional accuracy provided by RTM for velocity model updating. A solution is to generate 3D angle domain common image gathers from RTM, which are indexed by subsurface reflection angle and subsurface azimuth angle. We apply these 3D angle gathers to subsalt tomography with the result that there were improvements in velocity updating with a wide-azimuth data set in the Gulf of Mexico.


Geophysics ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 77 (6) ◽  
pp. S131-S143 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alexander Klokov ◽  
Sergey Fomel

Common-reflection angle migration can produce migrated gathers either in the scattering-angle domain or in the dip-angle domain. The latter reveals a clear distinction between reflection and diffraction events. We derived analytical expressions for events in the dip-angle domain and found that the shape difference can be used for reflection/diffraction separation. We defined reflection and diffraction models in the Radon space. The Radon transform allowed us to isolate diffractions from reflections and noise. The separation procedure can be performed after either time migration or depth migration. Synthetic and real data examples confirmed the validity of this technique.


Geophysics ◽  
1997 ◽  
Vol 62 (4) ◽  
pp. 1226-1237 ◽  
Author(s):  
Irina Apostoiu‐Marin ◽  
Andreas Ehinger

Prestack depth migration can be used in the velocity model estimation process if one succeeds in interpreting depth events obtained with erroneous velocity models. The interpretational difficulty arises from the fact that migration with erroneous velocity does not yield the geologically correct reflector geometries and that individual migrated images suffer from poor signal‐to‐noise ratio. Moreover, migrated events may be of considerable complexity and thus hard to identify. In this paper, we examine the influence of wrong velocity models on the output of prestack depth migration in the case of straight reflector and point diffractor data in homogeneous media. To avoid obscuring migration results by artifacts (“smiles”), we use a geometrical technique for modeling and migration yielding a point‐to‐point map from time‐domain data to depth‐domain data. We discover that strong deformation of migrated events may occur even in situations of simple structures and small velocity errors. From a kinematical point of view, we compare the results of common‐shot and common‐offset migration. and we find that common‐offset migration with erroneous velocity models yields less severe image distortion than common‐shot migration. However, for any kind of migration, it is important to use the entire cube of migrated data to consistently interpret in the prestack depth‐migrated domain.


2016 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 355-371 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gavin Ward ◽  
Dean Baker

AbstractA new model of compression in the Upper Triassic overlying the Rhyl Field has been developed for the Keys Basin, Irish Sea. This paper highlights the significance of the overburden velocity model in revealing the true structure of the field. The advent of 3D seismic and pre-stack depth migration has improved the interpreter's knowledge of complex velocity fields, such as shallow channels, salt bodies and volcanic intrusions. The huge leaps in processing power and migration algorithms have advanced the understanding of many anomalous features, but at a price: seismic imaging has always been a balance of quality against time and cost. As surveys get bigger and velocity analyses become more automated, quality control of the basic geological assumptions becomes an even more critical factor in the processing of seismic data and in the interpretation of structure. However, without knowledge of both regional and local geology, many features in the subsurface can be processed out of the seismic by relying too heavily on processing algorithms to image the structural model. Regrettably, without an integrated approach, this sometimes results in basic geological principles taking second place to technology and has contributed to hiding the structure of the Rhyl Field until recently.


1996 ◽  
Vol 15 (6) ◽  
pp. 751-753 ◽  
Author(s):  
Y. C. Kim ◽  
C. M. Samuelsen ◽  
T. A. Hauge

Geophysics ◽  
2003 ◽  
Vol 68 (6) ◽  
pp. 1782-1791 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Graziella Kirtland Grech ◽  
Don C. Lawton ◽  
Scott Cheadle

We have developed an anisotropic prestack depth migration code that can migrate either vertical seismic profile (VSP) or surface seismic data. We use this migration code in a new method for integrated VSP and surface seismic depth imaging. Instead of splicing the VSP image into the section derived from surface seismic data, we use the same migration algorithm and a single velocity model to migrate both data sets to a common output grid. We then scale and sum the two images to yield one integrated depth‐migrated section. After testing this method on synthetic surface seismic and VSP data, we applied it to field data from a 2D surface seismic line and a multioffset VSP from the Rocky Mountain Foothills of southern Alberta, Canada. Our results show that the resulting integrated image exhibits significant improvement over that obtained from (a) the migration of either data set alone or (b) the conventional splicing approach. The integrated image uses the broader frequency bandwidth of the VSP data to provide higher vertical resolution than the migration of the surface seismic data. The integrated image also shows enhanced structural detail, since no part of the surface seismic section is eliminated, and good event continuity through the use of a single migration–velocity model, obtained by an integrated interpretation of borehole and surface seismic data. This enhanced migrated image enabled us to perform a more robust interpretation with good well ties.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document