Can we perform statistical deconvolution by polynomial factorization?

Geophysics ◽  
1991 ◽  
Vol 56 (9) ◽  
pp. 1423-1431 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anton Ziolkowski ◽  
Evert Slob

We investigate the possibility of finding the source signature from multichannel seismic data by factorization of the Z-transforms of the seismic traces. In the convolutional model of the data, the source signature is the same from trace to trace within a shot gather, while the impulse response of the earth varies. In the noise‐free case, the roots of the Z-transform of the wavelet are the same from trace to trace, while the roots of the Z-transform of the impulse response of the earth must move from trace to trace. It follows that the roots of the wavelet can be found by the invariance of their positions. We demonstrate this using a simple wedge model. No assumptions about the length of the wavelet or the statistical properties of the impulse response of the earth are required. It is shown that this idea cannot work on real seismic data. There are two difficulties which we regard as insuperable. First, even without noise, a seismic trace cannot be regarded as a complete convolution, because the data are always truncated. This causes the factorization to be inexact: the wavelet roots move from trace to trace and are indistinguishable from the roots of the earth’s impulse response. Second, the addition of a small amount of noise alters the root pattern unpredictably from trace to trace and the roots of the wavelet are again indistinguishable from the roots of the earth’s impulse response. We conclude that it is impossible to identify and extract the true source signature from real seismic data using no assumptions about the statistical properties of the impulse response of the earth. We propose that the signature should be measured.

Geophysics ◽  
1993 ◽  
Vol 58 (8) ◽  
pp. 1174-1182 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anton Ziolkowski

It is normally impossible to measure the source signature in land seismic data acquisition with a dynamite source, because it is normally impossible to separate the incident field from the scattered field. Nevertheless, in any serious attempt to invert the seismic data, it is essential to know the source signature; for the dynamite source this is the volume injection function. The problem can be solved by using two different shots at each shot point and relating the source signatures by the source scaling law, which follows from the invariance of the medium parameters with the size of the charge. The volume injection function of the larger shot is an amplified and stretched version of that of the smaller shot, the amplification factor being equal to the ratio of the charge masses and the time stretch factor being equal to the cube‐root of this ratio. At a given receiver, the response to one shot is a convolution of the source signature with the impulse response of the earth, plus noise. The two shots and the scaling law give three independent equations relating the three unknowns: the two source signatures and the impulse response of the earth (plus noise). This theory may be put at risk in a physical experiment which requires a third shot at the same shot point, using a known mass of dynamite, different from the first two. The resulting shot record should be different from the first two and, apart from the noise, should be predictable from them.


Geophysics ◽  
1988 ◽  
Vol 53 (11) ◽  
pp. 1491-1492
Author(s):  
Anton Ziolkowski ◽  
Jacob Fokkema

We thank Andrew Walden and Roy White for their interest in our paper and their explanation of the practical whiteness assumption in deconvolution. As we understand it, what they are saying is this: True whiteness is not at issue when we are dealing with finite chunks of data. The only thing that matters is whether the statistical properties of a finite segment of the impulse response of the earth (what Walden and White call the reflection response [Formula: see text]) are those of a finite length sample from an uncorrelated sequence. Quite. And how are we going to find that out unless we first do the signature deconvolution with a known signature? In other words, we can only test this assumption in circumstances where we have no need of it.


Author(s):  
Nina Skaarup ◽  
James A. Chalmers

NOTE: This article was published in a former series of GEUS Bulletin. Please use the original series name when citing this article, for example: Skaarup, N., & Chalmers, J. A. (1998). A possible new hydrocarbon play, offshore central West Greenland. Geology of Greenland Survey Bulletin, 180, 28-30. https://doi.org/10.34194/ggub.v180.5082 _______________ The discovery of extensive seeps of crude oil onshore central West Greenland (Christiansen et al. 1992, 1994, 1995, 1996, 1997, 1998, this volume; Christiansen 1993) means that the central West Greenland area is now prospective for hydrocarbons in its own right. Analysis of the oils (Bojesen-Koefoed et al. in press) shows that their source rocks are probably nearby and, because the oils are found within the Lower Tertiary basalts, the source rocks must be below the basalts. It is therefore possible that in the offshore area oil could have migrated through the basalts and be trapped in overlying sediments. In the offshore area to the west of Disko and Nuussuaq (Fig. 1), Whittaker (1995, 1996) interpreted a few multichannel seismic lines acquired in 1990, together with some seismic data acquired by industry in the 1970s. He described a number of large rotated fault-blocks containing structural closures at top basalt level that could indicate leads capable of trapping hydrocarbons. In order to investigate Whittaker’s (1995, 1996) interpretation, in 1995 the Geological Survey of Greenland acquired 1960 km new multichannel seismic data (Fig. 1) using funds provided by the Government of Greenland, Minerals Office (now Bureau of Minerals and Petroleum) and the Danish State through the Mineral Resources Administration for Greenland. The data were acquired using the Danish Naval vessel Thetis which had been adapted to accommodate seismic equipment. The data acquired in 1995 have been integrated with the older data and an interpretation has been carried out of the structure of the top basalt reflection. This work shows a fault pattern in general agreement with that of Whittaker (1995, 1996), although there are differences in detail. In particular the largest structural closure reported by Whittaker (1995) has not been confirmed. Furthermore, one of Whittaker’s (1995) smaller leads seems to be larger than he had interpreted and may be associated with a DHI (direct hydrocarbon indicator) in the form of a ‘bright spot’.


Geophysics ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 72 (3) ◽  
pp. O9-O17 ◽  
Author(s):  
Upendra K. Tiwari ◽  
George A. McMechan

In inversion of viscoelastic full-wavefield seismic data, the choice of model parameterization influences the uncertainties and biases in estimating seismic and petrophysical parameters. Using an incomplete model parameterization results in solutions in which the effects of missing parameters are attributed erroneously to the parameters that are included. Incompleteness in this context means assuming the earth is elastic rather than viscoelastic. The inclusion of compressional and shear-wave quality factors [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text] in inversion gives better estimates of reservoir properties than the less complete (elastic) model parameterization. [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text] are sensitive primarily to fluid types and saturations. The parameter correlations are sensitive also to the model parameterization. As noise increases in the viscoelastic input data, the resolution of the estimated parameters decreases, but the parameter correlations are relatively unaffected by modest noise levels.


2013 ◽  
Vol 184 (1) ◽  
pp. 162-171 ◽  
Author(s):  
J.J. Galiana-Merino ◽  
J.L. Rosa-Herranz ◽  
S. Rosa-Cintas ◽  
J.J. Martinez-Espla

1967 ◽  
Vol 57 (1) ◽  
pp. 83-90
Author(s):  
J. A. Hudson ◽  
L. Knopoff

abstract The two-dimensional problems of the scattering of harmonic body waves and Rayleigh waves by topographic irregularities in the surface of a simplified model of the earth are considered with especial reference to the processes of P-R, SV-R and R-R scattering. The topography is assumed to have certain statistical properties; the scattered surface waves also have describable statistical properties. The results obtained show that the maximum scattered seismic noise is in the range of wavelengths of the order of the lateral dimensions of the topography. The process SV-R is maximized over a broader band of wavelengths than the process P-R and thus the former may be more difficult to remove by selective filtering. An investigation of the process R-R shows that backscattering is much more important than forward scattering and hence topography beyond the array must be taken into account.


2012 ◽  
Vol 554-557 ◽  
pp. 18-29 ◽  
Author(s):  
Junjiang Zhu ◽  
Xuelin Qiu ◽  
Heidrun Kopp ◽  
Huilong Xu ◽  
Zongxun Sun ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document