Nonspecular reflections from a curved interface

Geophysics ◽  
1991 ◽  
Vol 56 (8) ◽  
pp. 1203-1214 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Schleicher ◽  
P. Hubral ◽  
M. Tygel

If an incident wavefield hits a curved interface that possesses certain inflection points, there may exist “nonspecular” events in the reflected field that cannot be explained by real ray theory. The magnitude of such events can reach the order of the specular ones and can be expressed in terms of specular reflections at certain points on the analytic continuation of the interface. In fact, specular reflected “complex rays,” connecting complex reflection points with the observation point, are used to explain such events. Previous results obtained for acoustic calculations, involving an incident plane wave and a perfectly soft reflector, are extended to arbitrary velocity and density contrasts, as well as to an incident far‐field cylindrical wavefield. Moreover, the agreement between analytic results and independent computations using a finite‐differences scheme is shown. It confirms the existence of nonspecular reflections. The interpreter of a seismic section should, therefore, be aware of not attributing a subsurface interface to a nonspecular reflection, e.g., at a flank of a saltdome.

Geophysics ◽  
1990 ◽  
Vol 55 (4) ◽  
pp. 422-432 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. J. Hearn ◽  
E. S. Krebes

A plane wave propagating in a viscoelastic medium is generally inhomogeneous, meaning that the direction in which the spatial rate of amplitude attenuation is maximum is generally different from the direction of travel. The angle between these two directions, which we call the “attenuation angle,” is an acute angle. In order to trace the ray corresponding to a plane wave propagating between a source point and a receiver point in a layered viscoelastic medium, one must know both the initial propagation angle (the angle that the raypath makes with the vertical) and the initial attenuation angle at the source point. In some recent literature on the computation of ray‐synthetic seismograms in anelastic media, values for the initial attenuation angle are chosen arbitrarily; but this approach is fundamentally unsatisfactory, since different choices lead to different results for the computed waveforms. Another approach, which is more deterministic and physically acceptable, is to deduce the value of the initial attenuation angle from the value of the complex ray parameter at the saddle point of the complex traveltime function. This value can be obtained by applying the method of steepest descent to evaluate approximately the integrals giving the exact wave field at the observation point. This well‐known technique results in the ray‐theory limit. The initial propagation angle can also be determined from the saddle point. Among all possible primary rays between source and receiver, each having different initial propagation and attenuation angles, the ray determined by the saddle point, which we call a “stationary ray,” has the smallest traveltime, a result which is consistent with Fermat’s principle of least time. Such stationary rays are complex rays, i.e., the spatial (e.g., Cartesian) coordinates of points on stationary raypaths are complex numbers, whereas the arbitrarily determined rays mentioned above are usually traced as real rays. We compare examples of synthetic seismograms computed with stationary rays with those from some arbitrarily determined rays. If the initial value of the attenuation angle is arbitrarily chosen to be a constant for all initial propagation angles, the differences between the two types of seismograms are generally small or negligible in the subcritical zone, except when the constant is relatively large in value, say, within 10 degrees or so of its upper bound of 90 degrees. In that case, the differences are significant but still not large. However, if the surface layer is highly absorptive, the differences can be quite large and pronounced. For larger offsets, i.e., in the supercritical zone, large phase discrepancies can exist between the waveforms for the stationary rays and those for the arbitrarily determined rays, even if the constant initial attenuation angle is not large and even for moderate absorptivity in the surface layer.


Geophysics ◽  
1986 ◽  
Vol 51 (1) ◽  
pp. 50-53 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bjørn Ursin

Dynamic ray theory is used to compute the reflection response from a curved surface when the source and receiver are located at the same point. This response has also been computed by Cohen and Bleistein from the Helmholtz formula using the Kirchhoff approximation and the method of multidimensional stationary phase. The same approximation has been derived by Hilterman, and it may also be computed from a simple formula given by Hubral. Ray methods may be applied to the approximate computation of the reflection response from inhomogeneous media with complicated structure. This is not so easily done with methods based on the Kirchhoff approximation of the Helmholtz integral.


Geophysics ◽  
1996 ◽  
Vol 61 (2) ◽  
pp. 600-604 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matthias Brühl ◽  
Gijs J. O. Vermeer ◽  
Michael Kiehn

For monochromatic waves, the term “Fresnel zone” is well‐defined even though different authors use different terminology. Most authors use the definition originating from optics. There, the first Fresnel zone is defined as the area of a circular hole in a screen between a light source and an observation point that produces maximum light intensity in the observation point (Figure 1). If the radius of the hole is enlarged, minima and maxima in light intensity alternate. The first maximum is reached if the raypath difference between the direct ray and the ray traveling via the edge of the hole equals half a wavelength. The extension of the definition to energy reflected from a circular disk is straightforward (if we restrict ourselves to ray theory and neglect the angle dependency of the reflection coefficient) and is illustrated in Figure 2 (see also Sheriff, 1991).


When a cylindrical pulse is emitted from a line source buried in a semi-infinite homogeneous elastic medium, the subsequent disturbance at any point near the surface is much more complex than for an incident plane pulse. The curvature of the wave-fronts produces diffraction effects, of which the Rayleigh-pulse is the most important. In this paper the exact formal solution is given in terms of double integrals. These are evaluated approximately for the case when the depths of source and point of reception are small compared with their distance apart, allowing a description of the sequence of pulses which arrive at the point of reception. When that point is at the surface and distant from the epicentre, the disturbance there can be regarded as made up of the following pulses, in order of arrival: ( a ) for initial P -pulse at source: P -pulse, surface. S -pulse and Rayleigh-pulse; ( b ) for initial S -pulse: surface P -pulse, S - pulse and Rayleigh-pulse. If the initial pulse has the form of a jerk in displacement, the P - and S - pulses arrive as similar jerks, whereas the Rayleigh-pulse is blunted, having no definite beginning or end. The surface P-pulse takes a minimum-time path and arrives with a jerk in velocity. The surface S -pulse, on the other hand, is confined to the neighbourhood of the surface and arrives as a blunted pulse. Moreover, part of the S -pulse arrives before the time at which it would be expected on geometrical theory. Although derived on very restricting hypotheses, these results may throw some light on seismological problems. In particular, it is shown that when the sharp S -pulse of ray theory is converted by the presence of the surface S -pulse and the spreading of S into a blunted pulse, the duration of this composite pulse is of the same order of magnitude as the observed scatter of readings of Sg and other distortional pulses from near earthquakes.


Radio Science ◽  
1987 ◽  
Vol 22 (6) ◽  
pp. 952-958 ◽  
Author(s):  
H. Ikuno ◽  
L. B. Felsen

Author(s):  
G. Thomas ◽  
K. M. Krishnan ◽  
Y. Yokota ◽  
H. Hashimoto

For crystalline materials, an incident plane wave of electrons under conditions of strong dynamical scattering sets up a standing wave within the crystal. The intensity modulations of this standing wave within the crystal unit cell are a function of the incident beam orientation and the acceleration voltage. As the scattering events (such as inner shell excitations) that lead to characteristic x-ray production are highly localized, the x-ray intensities in turn, are strongly determined by the orientation and the acceleration voltage. For a given acceleration voltage or wavelength of the incident wave, it has been shown that this orientation dependence of the characteristic x-ray emission, termed the “Borrmann effect”, can also be used as a probe for determining specific site occupations of elemental additions in single crystals.


2006 ◽  
Vol 176 (9) ◽  
pp. 965
Author(s):  
B.A. Knyazev ◽  
I.A. Kotel'nikov ◽  
A.A. Tyutin ◽  
V.S. Cherkasskii

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document