To: “The electromagnetic response of thin sheets buried in a uniformly conducting half‐space,” which appeared in the January 1987 issue of GEOPHYSICS, p. 108–117

Geophysics ◽  
1987 ◽  
Vol 52 (10) ◽  
pp. 1455-1455

The term “4πσ” should be deleted from the left‐hand side of equations (16), (A-13), and (A-14).

Geophysics ◽  
1987 ◽  
Vol 52 (4) ◽  
pp. 583-583

On p. 112, the caption of Figure 4 should read “The (a) magnitude and (b) phase in radians of the x component of the horizontal electric field obtained for a square thin sheet of integrated conductivity 1 S, 8 skin depths on a side, buried at a depth of 0.1 skin depth when the incident electric field is x polarized. Each segment is 1 skin depth on a side.” On p. 114, the last sentence of the first paragraph in the Discussion should read “It is easy to see why the surface thin sheet is a popular modeling technique for magnetotelluric applications.”


Geophysics ◽  
1987 ◽  
Vol 52 (1) ◽  
pp. 108-117 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. Clark Robertson

The interpretation of magnetotelluric data is hampered by the effect of three‐dimensional (3-D) conductivity variations within the earth. In particular, the effects of deep structures are masked by heterogeneities near the surface. In order to understand the effects of 3-D anomalies on magnetotelluric investigations, the electromagnetic response of 3-D models of the earth must be investigated. One technique used to model a 3-D earth is the thin‐sheet approximation. This technique confines all lateral changes in conductivity to a horizontal layer in a laterally homogeneous earth; however, the thin‐sheet technique can be applied only to anomalies that are electrically thin at the frequency of investigation. The thin‐sheet technique can be extended to include a greater variety of models by stacking heterogeneous thin layers. As a first step, the thin‐sheet technique is extended to model a buried, heterogeneous thin layer. Extension of the method to account for buried thin sheets is theoretically and computationally more involved than for a surface thin sheet, but the buried thin sheet still has computational advantages over other 3-D models.


Geophysics ◽  
1971 ◽  
Vol 36 (1) ◽  
pp. 101-131 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gerald W. Hohmann

A theoretical solution is developed for the electromagnetic response of a two‐dimensional inhomogeneity in a conductive half‐space, in the field of a line source of current. The solution is in the form of an integral equation, which is reduced to a matrix equation, and solved numerically for the electric field in the body. The electric and magnetic fields at the surface of the half‐space are found by integrating the half‐space Green’s functions over the scattering currents. One advantage of this particular numerical technique is that it is necessary to solve for scattering currents only in the conductor and not throughout the half‐space. The response of a thin, vertical conductor is studied in some detail. Because the only interpretational aids available previously were scale model results for conductors in free space, the results presented here should be useful in interpreting data and in designing new EM systems. As expected, anomalies decay rapidly as depth of burial is increased, due to attenuation in the conductive half‐space. Depth of exploration appears to be greatest for measurements of horizontal magnetic field phase, while vertical field phase is diagnostic of conductivity. Horizontal location and depth of burial are best determined through measurements of vertical or horizontal magnetic field amplitude.


Geophysics ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. 1-52
Author(s):  
Thomas Bagley ◽  
Richard S. Smith

The horizontal and vertical components of the on-time electromagnetic (EM) response can be used to estimate the parameters of simple models like thin sheets, half-spaces, thin sheets over a lower half-space and a two-layer model. The formulae used in these methods are valid in areas where the on-time response is essentially proportional to the conductivity or conductance, the so called "resistive limit". The half-space and thin-sheet over a lower half-space models can be combined to give an estimate of the conductivity for a lower half-space below a thick sheet that might be reasonable for the whole of the survey area. With this estimation an equation solver can be used to estimate the thickness and conductivity of the overlying thick sheet over the whole survey area. This latter approach seemed most appropriate for the Russell South area in the Athabasca Basin, Canada, where GEOTEM data has been collected. The output of the algorithm was generally stable. Although it did not always reliably reproduce the overburden thicknesses as measured in a set of reference drill holes, it did give an estimate that was reasonable in the relatively conductive areas.


Geophysics ◽  
1985 ◽  
Vol 50 (7) ◽  
pp. 1144-1162 ◽  
Author(s):  
William A. SanFilipo ◽  
Perry A. Eaton ◽  
Gerald W. Hohmann

The transient electromagnetic (TEM) response of a three‐dimensional (3-D) prism in a conductive half‐space is not always approximated well by three‐dimensional free‐space or two‐dimensional (2-D) conductive host models. The 3-D conductive host model is characterized by a complex interaction between inductive and current channeling effects. We numerically computed 3-D TEM responses using a time‐domain integral‐equation solution. Models consist of a vertical or horizontal prismatic conductor in conductive half‐space, energized by a rapid linear turn‐off of current in a rectangular loop. Current channeling, characterized by currents that flow through the body, is produced by charges which accumulate on the surface of the 3-D body and results in response profiles that can be much different in amplitude and shape than the corresponding response for the same body in free space, even after subtracting the half‐space response. Responses characterized by inductive (vortex) currents circulating within the body are similar to the response of the body in free space after subtracting the half‐space contribution. The difference between responses dominated by either channeled or vortex currents is subtle for vertical bodies but dramatic for horizontal bodies. Changing the conductivity of the host effects the relative importance of current channeling, the velocity and rate of decay of the primary (half‐space) electric field, and the build‐up of eddy currents in the body. As host conductivity increases, current channeling enhances the amplitude of the response of a vertical body and broadens the anomaly along the profile. For a horizontal body the shape of the anomaly is distorted from the free‐space anomaly by current channeling and is highly sensitive to the resistivity of the host. In the latter case, a 2-D response is similar to the 3-D response only if current channeling effects dominate over inductive effects. For models that are not greatly elongated, TEM responses are more sensitive to the conductivity of the body than galvanic (dc) responses, which saturate at a moderate resistivity contrast. Multicomponent data are preferable to vertical component data because in some cases the presence and location of the target are more easily resolved in the horizontal response and because the horizontal half‐space response decays more quickly than does the corresponding vertical response.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document