Wave‐field extrapolation by the linearly transformed wave equation

Geophysics ◽  
1986 ◽  
Vol 51 (8) ◽  
pp. 1538-1551 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zhiming Li

Many approximations to different order of the one‐way scalar wave equation have been suggested in seismic imaging or modeling. Of these approximations, the first‐order approximation, usually called the 15‐degree equation, is most commonly used in industry because of its high efficiency. However, one common constraint of all these approximations is that they cannot handle large‐angle events exactly. Through a linear transformation of the wave equation, the LInearly Transformed Wave EQuation (LITWEQ) is obtainable, without approximation. The LITWEQ has the form of the 15‐degree equation. The solution to the LITWEQ is still a two‐way wave solution. By imposing the boundary condition for upcoming (or downgoing) waves, the LITWEQ can be applied to seismic imaging (or modeling). Implementing the LITWEQ with a finite‐differencing algorithm gives a 180‐degree, or all‐dip, finite‐difference wave‐extrapolation operator, which solves the angle limitation problem of conventional finite‐difference methods.

2019 ◽  
Vol 146 (5) ◽  
pp. 3629-3645 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sebastian T. PrepeliȚă ◽  
Javier Gómez Bolaños ◽  
Michele Geronazzo ◽  
Ravish Mehra ◽  
Lauri Savioja

Geophysics ◽  
1996 ◽  
Vol 61 (5) ◽  
pp. 1394-1399 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas Rühl

Finite‐difference (FD) migration is one of the most often used standard migration methods in practice. The merit of FD migration is its ability to handle arbitrary laterally and vertically varying macro velocity fields. The well‐known disadvantage is that wave propagation is only performed accurately in a more or less narrow cone around the vertical. This shortcoming originates from the fact that the exact one‐way wave equation can be implemented only approximately in finite‐difference schemes because of economical reasons. The Taylor or continued fraction expansion of the square root operator in the one‐way wave equation must be truncated resulting in an approximate version of the one‐way wave equation valid only for a restricted angle range.


Author(s):  
Appanah Rao Appadu ◽  
Gysbert Nicolaas de Waal

IIn this paper, two finite difference methods are used to solve the one-dimensional second order wave equation with constant coefficients subject to specified initial and boundary conditions. Two numerical experiments are considered. The two methods are Central in Time and Central in Space scheme with second order accuracy in both time and space, abbreviated as CTCS (2,2) and Central in Time and Central in Space scheme with second order accuracy in time and fourth order accuracy in space, abbreviated as CTCS (2,4). Properties such as consistency and stability are studied. We also perform spectral analysis of dispersive and dissipative properties of the two methods. Two numerical experiments are considered, and the numerical results are displayed.


2004 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 34-47 ◽  
Author(s):  
Francisco J. Gaspar ◽  
Francisco J. Lisbona ◽  
Petr N. Vabishchevich

AbstractEnergy estimates and convergence analysis of finite difference methods for Biot's consolidation model are presented for several types of radial ow. The model is written by a system of partial differential equations which depend on an integer parameter (n = 0; 1; 2) corresponding to the one-dimensional ow through a deformable slab and the radial ow through an elastic cylindrical or spherical shell respectively. The finite difference discretization is performed on staggered grids using separated points for the approximation of pressure and displacements. Numerical results are given to illustrate the obtained theoretical results.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document