MARINE SEISMIC REFRACTION STUDIES NEAR KODIAK, ALASKA

Geophysics ◽  
1972 ◽  
Vol 37 (4) ◽  
pp. 697-700 ◽  
Author(s):  
George G. Shor ◽  
Roland Von Huene
Keyword(s):  
Cross Section ◽  
Crustal Structure ◽  
Seismic Refraction ◽  
Kodiak Island ◽  
East End ◽  
Marine Seismic

Seismic refraction profiles near Kodiak, Alaska have provided data for construction of a cross‐section showing the crustal structure from the east end of Kodiak Island across the continental terrace and slope to the Aleutian Trench (Figures 1 and 2). Five reversed refraction stations and one unreversed station were available (Table 1); interpretation was aided by access to reflection profiles which cross the refraction lines (Shor, 1972).

A seismic-based cross-section of the Grenville Orogen in southern Ontario and western Quebec

2000 ◽  
Vol 37 (2-3) ◽  
pp. 183-192 ◽  
Author(s):  
D J White ◽  
D A Forsyth ◽  
I Asudeh ◽  
S D Carr ◽  
H Wu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cross Section ◽  
Seismic Refraction ◽  
Shear Zones ◽  
Tectonic Zone ◽  
Grenville Province ◽  
Crustal Layer ◽  
Seismic Reflection Data ◽  
Velocity Models ◽  
Laurentian Margin ◽  
Structural Boundary

A schematic crustal cross-section is presented for the southwestern Grenville Province based on reprocessed Lithoprobe near-vertical incidence seismic reflection data and compiled seismic refraction - wide-angle velocity models interpreted with geological constraints. The schematic crustal architecture of the southwest Grenville Province from southeast to northwest comprises allochthonous crustal elements (Frontenac-Adirondack Belt and Composite Arc Belt) that were assembled prior to ca. 1160 Ma, and then deformed and transported northwest over reworked rocks of pre-Grenvillian Laurentia and the Laurentian margin primarily between 1120 and 980 Ma. Reworked pre-Grenvillian Laurentia and Laurentian margin rocks are interpreted to extend at least 350 km southeast of the Grenville Front beneath all of the Composite Arc Belt. Three major structural boundary zones (the Grenville Front and adjacent Grenville Front Tectonic Zone, the Central Metasedimentary Belt boundary thrust zone, and the Elzevir-Frontenac boundary zone) have been identified across the region of the cross-section based on their prominent geophysical signatures comprising broad zones of southeast-dipping reflections and shallowing of mid-crustal velocity contours by 12-15 km. The structural boundary zones accommodated southeast over northwest crustal stacking at successively earlier times during orogeny (ca. 1010-980 Ma, 1080-1060 Ma, and 1170-1160 Ma, respectively). These shear zones root within an interpreted gently southeast-dipping regional décollement at a depth of 25-30 km corresponding to the top of a high-velocity lower crustal layer.

scholarly journals A Seismic Refraction Study of the Crust and Upper Mantle in the Vicinity of Bass Strait

1969 ◽  
Vol 22 (5) ◽  
pp. 573 ◽  
Author(s):  
R Underwood
Keyword(s):  
Crustal Structure ◽  
Upper Mantle ◽  
Seismic Refraction ◽  
Travel Times ◽  
Crust And Upper Mantle ◽  
Australian Institute ◽  
First Arrival Travel Times ◽  
First Arrival ◽  
Future Work

A reconnaissance seismic refraction study of the crust and upper mantle of Bass Strait and adjacent land was undertaken in 1966 under the sponsorship of the Geophysics Group of the Australian Institute of Physics. The shot locations and times, the station locations, distances, and first arrival travel times are presented. Analysis of these data is described; they indicate a P n velocity below 8 km sec-I. Time terms are less than expected and do not agree with previous work. Crustal thicknesses cannot be computed until studies of upper crustal structure are made. These, and several mantle refraction studies, are suggested for future work.

Crustal structure of the southeast flank of Kilauea Volcano, Hawaii, from seismic refraction measurements

1980 ◽  
Vol 70 (4) ◽  
pp. 1149-1159
Author(s):  
John J. Zucca ◽  
David P. Hill
Keyword(s):  
Oceanic Crust ◽  
Crustal Structure ◽  
Seismic Refraction ◽  
Kilauea Volcano ◽  
Geological Survey ◽  
Pn Velocity ◽  
Kīlauea Volcano ◽  
Volcanic Pile ◽  
Rift Zones ◽  
The U.S

abstract In November 1976, the U.S. Geological Survey, in conjunction with the Hawaii Institute of Geophysics, established a 100-km-long seismic refraction line normal to the southeast coast of Hawaii across the submarine flank of Kilauea Volcano. Interpretation of the data suggests that the oceanic crust dips about 2° toward the island underneath the volcanic pile. The unreversed Pn velocity is 7.9 km/ sec with crustal velocities varying strongly along the profile. Profiles across the rift zones of Kilauea suggest that the velocity in the rifts is higher than the velocity in the surrounding extrusive rocks and that the velocity in the southwest rift (∼6.5 km/sec) is lower than the velocity in the east rift (∼7.0 km/sec). The rift boundaries seem to dip away from the rift such that a large part of the volcanic pile is composed of the higher velocity core of riftzone rock.

A seismic refraction study of the crustal structure of the South Kenya Rift

1989 ◽  
pp. 169-172
Author(s):  
W. Henry ◽  
J. Mechie ◽  
P. K. H. Maguire ◽  
J. Patel ◽  
G. R. Keller ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Crustal Structure ◽  
Seismic Refraction ◽  
The South ◽  
Kenya Rift

Crustal structure under Lasa from seismic refraction measurements

1973 ◽  
Vol 78 (35) ◽  
pp. 8721-8734 ◽  
Author(s):  
David H. Warren ◽  
John H. Healy ◽  
Joyce Bohn ◽  
P. Anthony Marshall
Keyword(s):  
Crustal Structure ◽  
Seismic Refraction

Seismic investigation of the Coast Plutonic Complex – Insular Belt boundary beneath the Strait of Georgia

1984 ◽  
Vol 21 (9) ◽  
pp. 1033-1049 ◽  
Author(s):  
Donald J. White ◽  
Ron M. Clowes
Keyword(s):  
Crustal Structure ◽  
Seismic Refraction ◽  
Unconsolidated Sediments ◽  
The West ◽  
Strait Of Georgia ◽  
Seismic Properties ◽  
Air Gun ◽  
Plutonic Complex ◽  
Major Fault ◽  
Coast Plutonic Complex

The Strait of Georgia, a topographic depression between Vancouver Island and the mainland of British Columbia, is considered to be the boundary between two tectonic provinces: the Coast Plutonic Complex on the east and the Insular Belt to the west. The allochthonous nature of the Insular Belt has been established, mainly on the basis of paleomagnetic measurements. Various tectonic models to explain the geological differences between the two provinces have been proposed. One of these suggests that the boundary is an old transform fault zone and is represented currently by a thrust fault along the eastern side of the Strait of Georgia. Other models propose that the Coast Plutonic Complex is a feature superimposed by tectonic and metamorphic events after the accretion of the Insular Belt. Such models do not require a major crustal discontinuity along the Strait of Georgia.In May 1982, a seismic refraction survey using a 32 L air gun and a radio telemetering sonobuoy system was carried out in the Strait of Georgia with the objective of investigating the nature of this boundary and determining the upper crustal structure. Three reversed profiles across the strait were shot; these are supplemented by several high-resolution reflection profiles from previous experiments. Two-dimensional models of the crustal structure across the strait have been constructed using a forward modelling ray trace and synthetic seismogram algorithm to match the travel times and amplitude characteristics of the data.Three basic layers or strata form the models, for which the maximum depth of reliability is 3 km. The first layer consists of unconsolidated sediments and Pleistocene glacial deposits, and the second represents Late Cretaceous – early Tertiary basin fill sediments that form the Nanaimo Group, the Burrard–Kitsilano formations, and the Chuckanut Formation. The third layer is likely the extension of the Coast Plutonic Complex beneath the strait, but the westerly limit of this unit is undetermined because of seismic properties similar to those of the Insular Belt volcanics. A local fault is located ~15 km northeast of Galiano Island on the west side of the strait. However, our study shows no evidence for a major fault along the strait. Thus those aspects of tectonic models that require the existence of a major transform or transcurrent fault boundary along the Strait of Georgia. may have to be revised.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document