A CONFIRMATION BY GRAVITY MEASUREMENTS OF AN UNDERGROUND DENSITY PROFILE BASED ON CORE DENSITIES
Accurate laboratory measurements of dry bulk densities of 79 samples of Paleozoic sedimentary rocks from a 2,851‐ft deep core hole near Barberton, Ohio, are the basis of a vertical profile of “natural” density which differs on the average [Formula: see text] or less from a profile of in‐situ density calculated from gravity variations observed using a LaCoste and Romberg gravimeter in an adjacent 2,247‐ft‐deep vertical mine shaft. Both profiles agree well with the most meaningful Barberton core sample densities reported by Hammer (1950, Fig. 3), but are significantly lower than in‐situ interval densities calculated by Hammer from gravity variations observed in the shaft using a Gulf gravimeter. The [Formula: see text] average discrepancy between the old and new in‐situ density profiles is probably attributable to a 12‐percent error in calibration of the Gulf gravimeter. The close agreement between the new profiles of “natural” and in‐situ density suggests that changes in bulk volume of compact sedimentary rocks that occur during or following the coring process are probably ordinarily so small that properly constructed core sample density profiles are reproducible and reliable even when small numbers of samples of aged cores are used. If they are to be used for determination of in‐situ density, underground gravity measurements must be accurate as well as precise.