A NEW DATA‐PROCESSING TECHNIQUE FOR THE ELIMINATION OF GHOST ARRIVALS ON REFLECTION SEISMOGRAMS

Geophysics ◽  
1964 ◽  
Vol 29 (5) ◽  
pp. 783-805 ◽  
Author(s):  
William A. Schneider ◽  
Kenneth L. Larner ◽  
J. P. Burg ◽  
Milo M. Backus

A new data‐processing technique is presented for the separation of initially up‐traveling (ghost) energy from initially down‐traveling (primary) energy on reflection seismograms. The method combines records from two or more shot depths after prefiltering each record with a different filter. The filters are designed on a least‐mean‐square‐error criterion to extract primary reflections in the presence of ghost reflections and random noise. Filter design is dependent only on the difference in uphole time between shots, and is independent of the details of near‐surface layering. The method achieves wide‐band separation of primary and ghost energy, which results in 10–15 db greater attenuation of ghost reflections than can be achieved with conventional two‐ or three‐shot stacking (no prefiltering) for ghost elimination. The technique is illustrated in terms of both synthetic and field examples. The deghosted field data are used to study the near‐surface reflection response by computing the optimum linear filter to transform the deghosted trace back into the original ghosted trace. The impulse response of this filter embodies the effects of the near‐surface on the reflection seismogram, i.e. the cause of the ghosting. Analysis of these filters reveals that the ghosting mechanism in the field test area consists of both a surface‐ and base‐of‐weathering layer reflector.

Geophysics ◽  
1965 ◽  
Vol 30 (3) ◽  
pp. 348-362 ◽  
Author(s):  
William A. Schneider ◽  
E. R. Prince ◽  
Ben F. Giles

A new data‐processing technique is presented which utilizes optimum multichannel digital filtering in conjunction with common subsurface horizontal stacking for the efficient rejection of multiple reflections. The method exploits the differential normal moveout between primary and multiple reflections that results from an increase in average velocity with depth. Triple subsurface coverage is obtained in the field; the common subsurface traces are individually prefiltered with different filters and stacked. The digital filters are designed on the least‐mean‐square‐error criteria to preserve primaries (signal) in the presence of multiples (noise) of predictable normal moveout, and random noise. The method achieves wide‐band separation of primary and multiple energy with only a three‐point stack; it can work effectively with small normal moveout differences eliminating the need for long offsets and the attendant signal degradation due to wide‐angle reflections; it does not require equal multiple moveout on the triplet of traces stacked; and finally the method is not sensitive to small errors in statics or predicted normal moveout. The technique is illustrated in terms of synthetic examples selected to encompass realistic field situations, and the parameter specification necessary for the multichannel filter design.


2011 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hongwei Xie ◽  
Hongyun Li ◽  
Zeping Xu ◽  
Guzhou Song ◽  
Faqiang Zhang ◽  
...  

Geophysics ◽  
1998 ◽  
Vol 63 (4) ◽  
pp. 1332-1338 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gregory S. Baker ◽  
Don W. Steeples ◽  
Matt Drake

A 300-m near‐surface seismic reflection profile was collected in southeastern Kansas to locate a fault(s) associated with a recognized stratigraphic offset on either side of a region of unexposed bedrock. A substantial increase in the S/N ratio of the final stacked section was achieved by muting all data arriving in time after the airwave. Methods of applying traditional seismic data processing techniques to near‐surface data (200 ms of data or less) often differ notably from hydrocarbon exploration‐scale processing (3–4 s of data or more). The example of noise cone muting used is contrary to normal exploration‐scale seismic data processing philosophy, which is to include all data containing signal. The noise cone mute applied to the data removed more than one‐third of the total data volume, some of which contains signal. In this case, however, the severe muting resulted in a higher S/N ratio in the final stacked section, even though some signal could be identified within the muted data. This example supports the suggestion that nontraditional techniques sometimes need to be considered when processing near‐surface seismic data.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document