scholarly journals A SEISMIC MODEL STUDY OF THE PHASE VELOCITY METHOD OF EXPLORATION

Geophysics ◽  
1957 ◽  
Vol 22 (2) ◽  
pp. 275-285 ◽  
Author(s):  
Frank Press

Variations in the phase velocity of earthquake‐generated surface waves have been used to determine local variations in the thickness of the earth’s crust. It is of interest to determine whether this method can be used to delineate structures encountered by the exploration geophysicist. A seismic model study of the effect of thickness changes, lithology changes, faults and scarps, on the phase velocity of surface waves was carried out. It is demonstrated that all of these structures produce measurable variations in the phase velocity of surface waves. Additional information is required, however, to give a unique interpretation of a given phase velocity variation in terms of a particular structure. Some remarks on the phenomenon of returning ground roll are made.

Geophysics ◽  
1955 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
pp. 19-32 ◽  
Author(s):  
F. K. Levin ◽  
H. C. Hibbard

Elastic wave propagation in a two‐layer section has been studied with a solid two‐bed model and records resembling seismograms obtained for the four possible source‐detector configurations. Numerous events are identified. Among these, the shear waves are found to be surprisingly prominent. The amplitude of the ground roll falls off approximately as [Formula: see text] This is the amplitude‐range dependence expected for a surface wave. The ability of two in‐line detectors to reduce surface waves has been demonstrated.


Author(s):  
Pavel O. Polyansky ◽  
◽  
Alexander F. Emanov ◽  
Alexandr S. Salnikov ◽  
◽  
...  

Digital processing of CDP–data, which are registered on North–East part of profile 3–DV, is done. Time sections which are result from method of head waves dynamic conversion were achieved for tectonic blocks are located at conjuction zone of Eurasian and Okhotomorskaya plates. Coefficients of refraction on the upper Earth’s crust were calculated based on frequencies difference between initial seismic traces and traces–results of processing. Seismic model of 0–2 km depth interval was constructed.


Geophysics ◽  
1965 ◽  
Vol 30 (4) ◽  
pp. 665-666 ◽  
Author(s):  
Keiiti Aki

In the VELA UNIFORM Special Issue I of Geophysics, M. N. Toksöz presented the result of his attempt at determining the shallow structures of the earth’s crust from the phase velocity of microseisms. He stated that his attempt resulted only in partial success on account of the fact that the microseisms arrived from more than one direction at the same time with comparable strength. He also concluded that there was no way of improving the results by the use of special arrays because, according to him, there were two unknown parameters, direction and phase velocity, and without the knowledge of one the other cannot be found. I thought this problem was already solved in my paper (Aki, 1957), in which a statistical theory of determining the phase velocity of random waves was given with a successful application to microseisms in Tokyo in the frequency range of 5 to 15 cps. Since Toksöz’s conclusion might have given a pessimistic view on the use of microseisms, I feel it is necessary to report a brief summary of my old paper published in a Japanese journal which might not be well circulated in the United States.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alexandra Mauerberger ◽  
Valerie Maupin ◽  
Hamzeh Sadeghisorkhani ◽  
Olafur Gudmundsson ◽  
Frederik Tilmann

<p>The Scandinavian mountain chain runs approximately parallel to the western coast of Norway with topography up to 2500 m. Since this region lacks recent compressional tectonic forces, we can study the geodynamic evolution of crustal and upper mantle structures which were once participating in continental collision and are now deeply eroded. Together with the ScanArray network we use data from previous and permanent projects, in total more >220 stations, for a surface wave tomography of entire Scandinavia using both earthquake and ambient noise data.</p><p>Initially, we performed a beamforming of Rayleigh surface waves which yielded average phase velocities for the study region and several of its sub-regions. However, a remarkable sin(1Θ) phase velocity variation with azimuth is observed in northern Scandinavia and southern Norway/Sweden but not in the central study area. For periods >35 s a 5% deviation between the maximum and minimum velocities was measured for opposite backazimuths of 120° and 300°, respectively. Such a variation is incompatible with azimuthal anisotropy or weak heterogeneity and might be caused by an eastward dipping lithosphere-asthenosphere boundary (LAB), as is implied by the observations of low shallow velocities below southern Norway in previous studies.</p><p>In order to test this hypothesis, we carried out 2D full-waveform modeling of the Rayleigh wave propagation in a model with a steep gradient in the LAB in combination with a pronounced reduction in the shear velocity below the LAB. This setup resulted in faster phase velocities for propagation in the direction of shallowing LAB, and slower ones for propagation in the direction of deepening LAB, consistent with the observation. This effect is probably due to the interference of reflected surface wave energy.</p><p>From this observed azimuthal bias, we demonstrate that an isotropic distribution of earthquakes is vital for the tomography results, otherwise significant velocity artefacts occur.</p><p>Phase velocity maps were derived with the two plane wave method. We merge those ballistic surface wave observations at longer periods with tomographic maps constructed from inter-station phase velocities measured on ambient noise stacks. Finally, we use a 1D transdimensional Bayesian method to invert the merged phase dispersion curves at each grid point for the V<sub>SV</sub> structure. Below the entire mountain belt a crustal root is absent consistent with previous studies. The Lofoten peninsula shows very low crustal and lithospheric V<sub>SV</sub> with a shallowing Moho towards the continental margin. The LAB is deepening from west to east with a sharp step both in the South (120 km depth) and the North (150 km depth). A high-velocity spot above the LAB in the North can be related to a gravity anomaly. The central area shows rather smooth varying structures from west to east. Additionally, we find low-velocity areas below 150 km depth beneath the Paleoproterozoic Baltic Shield in northern Finland. The sharp gradients in the LAB imaged in southern and northern Scandinavia are consistent with our sin(1Θ) phase velocity variation with azimuth whereas the smoother velocity structure in the central study area explains the absence of 1Θ phase velocity variations there.</p>


1915 ◽  
Vol 79 (2058supp) ◽  
pp. 382-383
Author(s):  
Alphonse Berget

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document