Cancer Nursing Research Short Course: Long-Term Follow-Up of Participants, 1984-1998

2004 ◽  
Vol 31 (2) ◽  
pp. E32-E38
Author(s):  
Marcia Grant ◽  
Kathleen Mooney ◽  
Dana Rutledge ◽  
Sarah Gerard ◽  
Linda Eaton
Keyword(s):  
Nursing Research ◽  
Cancer Nursing ◽  
Short Course ◽  
Long Term Follow Up

Long-term follow-up of patients with follicular lymphoma (FL) receiving single agent rituximab at two different schedules in study SAKK 35/98

2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 8512-8512 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. E. Ghielmini ◽  
S. Hsu Schmitz ◽  
G. Martinelli ◽  
F. Peccatori ◽  
U. Hess ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cox Regression ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Previous Treatment ◽  
Fc Receptor ◽  
Significant Prognostic Factor ◽  
Short Course ◽  
Long Term Follow Up ◽  
Second Tumor

8512 Background: In FL, rituximab as a single agent obtains a response rate of 50–70% with an EFS of 1–3 years depending on the population studied. Some patients respond to this treatment for a prolonged time, so we investigated, in a clinical trial, the proportion of long-term responders and the characteristics predicting long-term response. Methods: Between 1998 and 2002, chemotherapy naïve (n = 64) or pre-treated (n = 138) FL patients received 4 weekly doses of rituximab: those responding or with stable disease were randomized to either no further treatment (observation, n = 78) or 4 additional doses of rituximab given at 2 months intervals (consolidation, n = 73). Results: At a median follow up of 8.9 years, and with all living patients having been followed for at least 5 years, the median event-free survival (EFS: time until progression, relapse, second tumor or death) is 13 months for the observation and 24 months for the consolidation arm (p=0.0012). In the observation arm 10% had no event at 5-years, the figure dropping to 4% (3/78) at 8 years, while in the consolidation arm the EFS was 26% at 5 years and remained 18% (13/73) at 8 years. The only significant prognostic factor for EFS in a multivariate Cox regression was having received consolidation rituximab (hazard ratio = 0.58, CI = 0.44–0.87, p = 0.008), whereas being chemotherapy naïve, presenting with stage < IV and showing a VV phenotype at position 158 of the Fc receptor RIIIA were not any more significantly prognostic in this long term analysis, in contrast to previous data with shorter follow-up. No long-term toxicity from treatment was observed. There were 21 cases of second malignancy: 11 on observation, 10 receiving the consolidation arm. Conclusions: It appears that the EFS advantage of prolonged versus short course rituximab continues for many years after the end of treatment. This seems to hold true independently from previous treatment, stage or 158-phenotype of the Fc receptor. Patients treated with 8 doses of rituximab over 1 year have approximately 25% and 20% chance to remain in remission at 5 and 8 years respectively. [Table: see text]

Long-Term Follow-up of a Randomized Trial Comparing Cyclosporine and Short Course Methotrexate with Cyclosporine and Mycophenolate Mofetil for Graft Versus Host Disease Prophylaxis in Myeloablative HLA-Identical Sibling Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation.

Blood ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 120 (21) ◽  
pp. 3073-3073
Author(s):  
Betty K. Hamilton ◽  
Brian J. Bolwell ◽  
Matt Kalaycio ◽  
Lisa Rybicki ◽  
Rabi Hanna ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Randomized Trial ◽  
Conflicts Of Interest ◽  
Chronic Gvhd ◽  
Hematopoietic Cell ◽  
Short Course ◽  
Gvhd Prophylaxis ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Long Term Follow Up

Abstract Abstract 3073 The combination of a calcineurin inhibitor and methotrexate (MTX) is currently the gold standard for GVHD prophylaxis. MTX, however, is associated with toxicity including mucositis, delayed engraftment and other organ toxicity. We conducted a randomized trial comparing cyclosporine (CSA) and mycophenolate (MMF) with CSA and MTX for GVHD prophylaxis in recipients of myeloablative allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplants (HCT) with matched sibling donors (Bolwell et al, BMT 2004, 34:621). We showed reduced toxicity without an increased relapse rate in patients treated with MMF instead of MTX. Now, with a median follow up of almost 10 years, we report long-term outcomes of this study. From May 2001 until February 2003, 40 patients with hematologic malignancies were randomized to receive CSA (300mg/m2) and MMF (500mg three times daily) or CSA and short course MTX (5mg/m2 days 1, 3, 6, 11). Study endpoints included incidence of acute GVHD, severity of mucositis, time to engraftment of neutrophils and platelets and 100 day survival. Baseline variables were compared using the Wilcoxon rank sum tests or Chi square test. Outcomes were compared between MMF and MTX using the Pepe-Mori test. The two treatment arms were similar in patient characteristics such as age, disease, disease status, and CMV status. In total, 21 patients received MMF and 19 patients received MTX. The study was stopped early when an interim analysis demonstrated less mucositis, shorter length of stay and no difference in the incidence of GVHD or relapse with a median of 6 months of follow up. Currently, with a median follow up of 119 months (range 46–129 months) in survivors, there remains no difference in the incidence of or degree of acute (p≥0.35) or chronic GVHD (p≥0.53), overall survival (p=0.84) or relapse (p=0.41). There are 6 long term survivors in the MMF arm and 4 in the MTX arm. Of those that received MMF, 3 have mild chronic GVHD of the skin or upper GI tract and 1 has moderate chronic GVHD involving the skin, fascia, and vulva. Three of those who received MTX have mild chronic GVHD primarily of the skin. Only 3 patients (2 MMF and 1 MTX) remain off of all immunosuppression without evidence of GVHD. Eight patients (38%) died of relapse in the MMF arm versus 7 (37%) in the MTX arm which was also not statistically different (p=0.86). Death from GVHD was similar in both groups. Results from this updated analysis support our original conclusion that the combination of CSA and MMF results in decreased mucositis and more rapid engraftment compared with CSA and MTX, with no significant difference in GVHD, survival or relapse on long-term follow up. The primary limitation of this trial remains sample size and the ability to detect modest differences in survival. There remains limited data and virtually no long-term data comparing standard MTX based regimens with less toxic prophylaxis in myeloablative allogeneic HCT. Larger prospective studies with long-term follow up comparing GVHD prophylaxis regimens are warranted. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

scholarly journals Complications of Short-Course Oral Corticosteroids for Eosinophilic Chronic Rhinosinusitis during Long-Term Follow-Up

Sinusitis ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 5
Author(s):  
Remi Motegi ◽  
Shin Ito ◽  
Hirotomo Homma ◽  
Noritsugu Ono ◽  
Hiroko Okada ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Chronic Rhinosinusitis ◽  
Short Course ◽  
Eosinophilic Chronic Rhinosinusitis ◽  
Long Term Follow Up ◽  
Oral Corticosteroids

Therapy and prevention for mental health: What if mental diseases are mostly not brain disorders?

2019 ◽  
Vol 42 ◽  
Author(s):  
John P. A. Ioannidis
Keyword(s):  
Mental Health ◽  
Mental Disease ◽  
Brain Disorders ◽  
Social Stressors ◽  
Labor Education ◽  
Mental Diseases ◽  
Long Term Follow Up ◽  
Political Decisions

AbstractNeurobiology-based interventions for mental diseases and searches for useful biomarkers of treatment response have largely failed. Clinical trials should assess interventions related to environmental and social stressors, with long-term follow-up; social rather than biological endpoints; personalized outcomes; and suitable cluster, adaptive, and n-of-1 designs. Labor, education, financial, and other social/political decisions should be evaluated for their impacts on mental disease.

A comparison of two approaches to biofeedback treatment in children with recalcitrant constipation/encopresis. Long term follow up

2001 ◽  
Vol 120 (5) ◽  
pp. A397-A397
Author(s):  
M SAMERAMMAR ◽  
J CROFFIE ◽  
M PFEFFERKORN ◽  
S GUPTA ◽  
M CORKINS ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Long Term Follow Up ◽  
Biofeedback Treatment
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document