Depression in Internet and Face-to-Face Cancer Support Groups: A Pilot Study

2002 ◽  
Vol 29 (4) ◽  
pp. E45-E51 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paula Klemm ◽  
Thomas Hardie
2014 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Bernard M Garrett ◽  
John L Oliffe ◽  
Joan L Bottorff ◽  
Michael McKenzie ◽  
Christina S Han ◽  
...  

2013 ◽  
Vol 23 (5) ◽  
pp. 555-561 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yangmu Xu ◽  
Laura S. Testerman ◽  
Jason E. Owen ◽  
Erin O. Bantum ◽  
Andrea A. Thornton ◽  
...  

2007 ◽  
Vol 16 (8) ◽  
pp. 778-782 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kate Collie ◽  
Mary Anne Kreshka ◽  
Susan Ferrier ◽  
Rebecca Parsons ◽  
Kathy Graddy ◽  
...  

2008 ◽  
Vol 76 (3) ◽  
pp. 517-523 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anna Liess ◽  
Wendy Simon ◽  
Maya Yutsis ◽  
Jason E. Owen ◽  
Karen Altree Piemme ◽  
...  

2014 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. 163-172 ◽  
Author(s):  
John L. Oliffe ◽  
Suzanne Chambers ◽  
Bernie Garrett ◽  
Joan L. Bottorff ◽  
Michael McKenzie ◽  
...  

To understand prostate cancer (PCa) specialists’ views about prostate cancer support groups (PCSGs), a volunteer sample of Canada-based PCa specialists ( n = 150), including urologists ( n = 100), radiation oncologists ( n = 40), and medical oncologists ( n = 10) were surveyed. The 56-item questionnaire used in this study included six sets of attitudinal items to measure prostate cancer specialists’ beliefs about positive and negative influences of PCSGs, reasons for attending PCSGs, the attributes of effective PCSGs, and the value of face-to-face and web-based PCSGs. In addition, an open-ended question was included to invite additional input from participants. Results showed that PCSGs were positively valued, particularly for information sharing, education and psychosocial support. Inclusivity, privacy, and accessibility were identified as potential barriers, and recommendations were made for better marketing PCSGs to increase engagement. Findings suggest prostate cancer specialists highly valued the role and potential benefits of face-to-face PCSGs. Information provision and an educational role were perceived as key benefits. Some concerns were expressed about the ability of web-based PCSGs to effectively engage and educate men who experience prostate cancer.


2016 ◽  
Vol 32 (2) ◽  
pp. 142-151 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eunkyung Kim ◽  
Dietram A. Scheufele ◽  
Jeong Yeob Han ◽  
Dhavan Shah

2007 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 143-155 ◽  
Author(s):  
John L. Oliffe ◽  
Michael Halpin ◽  
Joan L. Bottorff ◽  
T. Gregory Hislop ◽  
Michael McKenzie ◽  
...  

Many prostate cancer support groups (PCSGs) have formed in North America during the past decade, yet their operation or factors influencing sustainability are poorly understood. This article reports micro (intragroup), meso (intergroup), and macro (group/structure) analyses drawn from the fieldwork and participant observations conducted for an ethnographic study of PCSGs based in British Columbia, Canada. The findings indicate that effective group leadership is integral to group sustainability and the recruitment and retention of attendees. At the meso level, intergroup connections and communication were often informal; however, the primary purpose of all the PCSGs was to provide information and support to men and their families. Many PCSGs were uncertain how formal associations with cancer fund-raising societies would influence group effectiveness. Macro issues such as prostate cancer activism resided with individual group “champions” through activities coordinated by provincial and national PCSG organizations. However, activism did not guarantee group sustainability. The study findings reveal why some groups flourish while others appear untenable, and form the basis for discussion about how PCSG sustainability might be best achieved.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document