scholarly journals Diagnostic value of chest ultrasound after cardiac surgery: a comparison with chest X-ray and auscultation

Critical Care ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 18 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. P130 ◽  
Author(s):  
A Vezzani ◽  
T Manca ◽  
F Benassi ◽  
A Gallingani ◽  
I Spaggiari ◽  
...  
2014 ◽  
Vol 28 (6) ◽  
pp. 1527-1532 ◽  
Author(s):  
Antonella Vezzani ◽  
Tullio Manca ◽  
Claudia Brusasco ◽  
Gregorio Santori ◽  
Massimo Valentino ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 30 (3) ◽  
pp. e23-e24 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vezzani Antonella ◽  
Manca Tullio ◽  
Brusasco Claudia ◽  
Benassi Filippo ◽  
Nicolini Francesco ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 3 (S1) ◽  
Author(s):  
A Vezzani ◽  
T Manca ◽  
F Corradi ◽  
C Brusasco ◽  
P Guido ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (04) ◽  
pp. 597-607
Author(s):  
Elham Saad Ellithey Elkhazragy ◽  
Saneya Abdel Halim Fahmy ◽  
Mona Sayed Mohammad Attaya ◽  
Ashraf Mohammad Abd Elrahman

2021 ◽  
Vol 104 (3) ◽  
pp. 003685042110162
Author(s):  
Fengxia Zeng ◽  
Yong Cai ◽  
Yi Guo ◽  
Weiguo Chen ◽  
Min Lin ◽  
...  

As the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) epidemic spreads around the world, the demand for imaging examinations increases accordingly. The value of conventional chest radiography (CCR) remains unclear. In this study, we aimed to investigate the diagnostic value of CCR in the detection of COVID-19 through a comparative analysis of CCR and CT. This study included 49 patients with 52 CT images and chest radiographs of pathogen-confirmed COVID-19 cases and COVID-19-suspected cases that were found to be negative (non-COVID-19). The performance of CCR in detecting COVID-19 was compared to CT imaging. The major signatures that allowed for differentiation between COVID-19 and non-COVID-19 cases were also evaluated. Approximately 75% (39/52) of images had positive findings on the chest x-ray examinations, while 80.7% (42/52) had positive chest CT scans. The COVID-19 group accounted for 88.4% (23/26) of positive chest X-ray examinations and 96.1% (25/26) of positive chest CT scans. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of CCR for abnormal shadows were 88%, 80%, and 87%, respectively, for all patients. For the COVID-19 group, the accuracy of CCR was 92%. The primary signature on CCR was flocculent shadows in both groups. The shadows were primarily in the bi-pulmonary, which was significantly different from non-COVID-19 patients ( p = 0.008). The major CT finding of COVID-19 patients was ground-glass opacities in both lungs, while in non-COVID-19 patients, consolidations combined with ground-glass opacities were more common in one lung than both lungs ( p = 0.0001). CCR showed excellent performance in detecting abnormal shadows in patients with confirmed COVID-19. However, it has limited value in differentiating COVID-19 patients from non-COVID-19 patients. Through the typical epidemiological history, laboratory examinations, and clinical symptoms, combined with the distributive characteristics of shadows, CCR may be useful to identify patients with possible COVID-19. This will allow for the rapid identification and quarantine of patients.


2009 ◽  
Vol 19 (4) ◽  
pp. 370-371 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kerstin Bosse ◽  
Thomas Krasemann

AbstractIn many paediatric cardiosurgical units, a chest X-ray is routinely performed before discharge. We sought to evaluate the clinical impact of such routine radiographs in the management of children after cardiac surgery.Of 100 consecutive children, a chest X-ray was performed in 71 prior to discharge. Of these, 38 were clinically indicated, while 33 were performed as a routine. Therapeutic changes were instituted on the basis of the X-ray in 4 patients, in all of whom the imaging had been clinically indicated. No therapeutic changes followed those radiographs performed on a routine basis.Conclusion: Routine chest radiographs can be omitted prior to discharging patients after paediatric heart surgery.


Author(s):  
Rosa Maria Lopez Lisbona ◽  
Marta Andrea Diez Ferrer ◽  
Noelia Cubero De Frutos ◽  
Pere Trias Sabria ◽  
Antonia Bonet Burguera ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
X Ray ◽  

1978 ◽  
Vol 135 (4) ◽  
pp. 604-606 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paul R. Liebman ◽  
Ervin Philips ◽  
Richard Weisel ◽  
Jameel Ali ◽  
Herbert B. Hechtman

2008 ◽  
Vol 34 (3) ◽  
pp. 542-544 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tanveer Khan ◽  
Girish Chawla ◽  
Romany Daniel ◽  
Mallikarjuna Swamy ◽  
Wade R. Dimitri

2019 ◽  
Vol 7 (15) ◽  
pp. 2457-2461
Author(s):  
Youssef Ibrahim Haggag ◽  
Karim Mashhour ◽  
Kamal Ahmed ◽  
Nael Samir ◽  
Waheed Radwan

BACKGROUND: Lung ultrasound (US) is an available and inexpensive tool for the diagnosis of community-acquired pneumonia (CAP); it which has no hazards of radiation and can be easily used. AIM: To evaluate the efficacy of lung ultrasound in the diagnosis and follow-up of CAP. PATIENTS AND METHODS: 100 patients aged from 40 to 63 years with a mean age of 52.3 ± 10 years admitted to the Critical Care Department, Cairo University with pictures of CAP. Lung US was performed for all patients initially, then a plain chest X-ray (CXR) was performed. Another lung ultrasound was performed on the 10th day after admission. RESULTS: Initial chest X-ray was correlated with the initial chest ultrasound examination in CAP diagnosis (R-value = 0.629, P < 0.001). Cohen's κ was run to determine if there is an agreement between the findings of the initial chest X-ray findings and those of the initial chest ultrasound in CAP diagnosis. A moderate agreement was found where κ = .567 (95% CI, 0.422 to 0.712) and P < 0.001. Upon initial examination, the CXR diagnosed CAP in 48.0% of patients, while lung US diagnosed the disease in 70% of patients. Moreover, lung US was more sensitive than CXR (P-value < 0.001). Compared to the accuracy of computed tomography (CT) chest (100%) which is the gold standard for CAP diagnosis, the accuracy of lung US was 95.0%, while the accuracy of CXR was 81.0%. CONCLUSION: This study proved the effectiveness of lung ultrasound in CAP diagnosis.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document