Body temperature patterns as a predictor of hospital-acquired sepsis in afebrile adult intensive care unit patients: a case-control study

Background Unplanned extubation commonly occurs in intensive care units. Various physical restraints have been used to prevent patients from removing their endotracheal tubes. However, physical restraint not only does not consistently prevent injury but also may be a safety hazard to patients. Objectives To evaluate the effect of physical restraint on unplanned extubation in adult intensive care patients. Methods A total of 100 patients with unplanned extubations and 200 age-, sex-, and diagnosis-matched controls with no record of unplanned extubation were included in this case-control study. The 300 participants were selected from a population of 1455 patients receiving mechanical ventilation during a 21-month period in an adult intensive care unit at a medical center in Taiwan. Data were collected by reviewing medical records and incident reports of unplanned extubation. Results The incidence rate of unplanned extubation was 8.7%. Factors associated with increased risk for unplanned extubation included use of physical restraints (increased risk, 3.11 times), nosocomial infection (increased risk, 2.02 times), and a score of 9 or greater on the Glasgow Coma Scale on admission to the unit (increased risk, 1.98 times). Episodes of unplanned extubation also were associated with longer stays in the unit. Conclusions An impaired level of consciousness on admission to the intensive care unit and the presence of nosocomial infection intensify the risk for unplanned extubation, even when physical restraints are used. To minimize the risk of unplanned extubation, nurses must establish better standards for using restraints.

Download Full-text

Risk Factors for Candidemia After Open Heart Surgery: Results From a Multicenter Case–Control Study

Open Forum Infectious Diseases ◽

10.1093/ofid/ofaa233 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 7 (8) ◽

Author(s):

Daniele Roberto Giacobbe ◽

Antonio Salsano ◽

Filippo Del Puente ◽

Ambra Miette ◽

Antonio Vena ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Risk Factors ◽

Intensive Care Unit ◽

Intensive Care ◽

Heart Surgery ◽

Case Control Study ◽

Open Heart Surgery ◽

Case Control ◽

Open Heart ◽

Previous Therapy ◽

Control Study

Abstract Background Candida species are among the most frequent causative agents of health care–associated bloodstream infections, with mortality >40% in critically ill patients. Specific populations of critically ill patients may present peculiar risk factors related to their reason for intensive care unit admission. The primary objective of the present study was to assess the predictors of candidemia after open heart surgery. Methods This retrospective, matched case–control study was conducted in 8 Italian hospitals from 2009 to 2016. The primary study objective was to assess factors associated with the development of candidemia after open heart surgery. Results Overall, 222 patients (74 cases and 148 controls) were included in the study. Candidemia developed at a median time (interquartile range) of 23 (14–36) days after surgery. In multivariable analysis, independent predictors of candidemia were New York Heart Association class III or IV (odds ratio [OR], 23.81; 95% CI, 5.73–98.95; P < .001), previous therapy with carbapenems (OR, 8.87; 95% CI, 2.57–30.67; P = .001), and previous therapy with fluoroquinolones (OR, 5.73; 95% CI, 1.61–20.41; P = .007). Crude 30-day mortality of candidemia was 53% (39/74). Septic shock was independently associated with mortality in the multivariable model (OR, 5.64; 95% CI, 1.91–16.63; P = .002). No association between prolonged cardiopulmonary bypass time and candidemia was observed in this study. Conclusions Previous broad-spectrum antibiotic therapy and high NYHA class were independent predictors of candidemia in cardiac surgery patients with prolonged postoperative intensive care unit stay.

Download Full-text

Risk Factors for Staphylococcus aureus Acquisition in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit: A Matched Case-Case-Control Study

Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology ◽

10.1017/ice.2017.234 ◽

2017 ◽

Vol 39 (1) ◽

pp. 46-52 ◽

Cited By ~ 5

Author(s):

Matthew C. Washam ◽

Andrea Ankrum ◽

Beth E. Haberman ◽

Mary Allen Staat ◽

David B. Haslam

Keyword(s):

Risk Factors ◽

Intensive Care Unit ◽

Staphylococcus Aureus ◽

Intensive Care ◽

Neonatal Intensive Care ◽

Case Control Study ◽

Case Control ◽

Entire Cohort ◽

Matched Case ◽

Control Study

OBJECTIVETo determine risk factors independent of length of stay (LOS) for Staphylococcus aureus acquisition in infants admitted to the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU).DESIGNRetrospective matched case–case-control study.SETTINGQuaternary-care referral NICU at a large academic children’s hospital.METHODSInfants admitted between January 2014 and March 2016 at a level IV NICU who acquired methicillin resistant (MRSA) or susceptible (MSSA) S. aureus were matched with controls by duration of exposure to determine risk factors for acquisition. A secondary post hoc analysis was performed on the entire cohort of at-risk infants for risk factors identified in the primary analysis to further quantify risk.RESULTSIn total, 1,751 infants were admitted during the study period with 199 infants identified as having S. aureus prevalent on admission. There were 246 incident S. aureus acquisitions in the remaining at-risk infant cohort. On matched analysis, infants housed in a single-bed unit were associated with a significantly decreased risk of both MRSA (P=.03) and MSSA (P=.01) acquisition compared with infants housed in multibed pods. Across the entire cohort, pooled S. aureus acquisition was significantly lower in infants housed in single-bed units (hazard ratio,=0.46; confidence interval, 0.34–0.62).CONCLUSIONSNICU bed design is significantly associated with S. aureus acquisition in hospitalized infants independent of LOS.Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2018;39:46–52

Download Full-text