scholarly journals Decubitus ulcers are associated with prolonged length of stay in critically ill patients

Critical Care ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 17 (S2) ◽  
Author(s):  
WT McGee ◽  
BH Nathanson ◽  
E Lederman ◽  
TL Higgins
Keyword(s):  
Length Of Stay ◽  
Critically Ill ◽  
Critically Ill Patients ◽  
Decubitus Ulcers ◽  
Prolonged Length

scholarly journals Outcomes of non-COVID-19 critically ill patients during the COVID-19 pandemic

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Răzvan Bologheanu ◽  
Mathias Maleczek ◽  
Daniel Laxar ◽  
Oliver Kimberger
Keyword(s):  
Intensive Care ◽  
Length Of Stay ◽  
Critically Ill ◽  
Critically Ill Patients ◽  
Medical Specialty ◽  
Routine Care ◽  
Treatment Pathways ◽  
Icu Length Of Stay ◽  
Matched Study ◽  
The Impact

Summary Background Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) disrupts routine care and alters treatment pathways in every medical specialty, including intensive care medicine, which has been at the core of the pandemic response. The impact of the pandemic is inevitably not limited to patients with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection and their outcomes; however, the impact of COVID-19 on intensive care has not yet been analyzed. Methods The objective of this propensity score-matched study was to compare the clinical outcomes of non-COVID-19 critically ill patients with the outcomes of prepandemic patients. Critically ill, non-COVID-19 patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) during the first wave of the pandemic were matched with patients admitted in the previous year. Mortality, length of stay, and rate of readmission were compared between the two groups after matching. Results A total of 211 critically ill SARS-CoV‑2 negative patients admitted between 13 March 2020 and 16 May 2020 were matched to 211 controls, selected from a matching pool of 1421 eligible patients admitted to the ICU in 2019. After matching, the outcomes were not significantly different between the two groups: ICU mortality was 5.2% in 2019 and 8.5% in 2020, p = 0.248, while intrahospital mortality was 10.9% in 2019 and 14.2% in 2020, p = 0.378. The median ICU length of stay was similar in 2019: 4 days (IQR 2–6) compared to 2020: 4 days (IQR 2–7), p = 0.196. The rate of ICU readmission was 15.6% in 2019 and 10.9% in 2020, p = 0.344. Conclusion In this retrospective single center study, mortality, ICU length of stay, and rate of ICU readmission did not differ significantly between patients admitted to the ICU during the implementation of hospital-wide COVID-19 contingency planning and patients admitted to the ICU before the pandemic.

Development and validation of a medication regimen complexity scoring tool for critically ill patients

2019 ◽  
Vol 76 (Supplement_2) ◽  
pp. S34-S40 ◽  
Author(s):  
Morgan E Gwynn ◽  
Margaret O Poisson ◽  
Jennifer L Waller ◽  
Andrea Sikora Newsome
Keyword(s):  
Length Of Stay ◽  
Critically Ill ◽  
Patient Outcomes ◽  
Critically Ill Patients ◽  
External Validation ◽  
Medication Regimen ◽  
Patient Acuity ◽  
Medication Regimen Complexity ◽  
Regimen Complexity ◽  
Scoring Tool

Abstract Purpose The purpose of this study was to develop and validate a novel medication regimen complexity–intensive care unit (MRC-ICU) scoring tool in critically ill patients and to correlate MRC with illness severity and patient outcomes. Methods This study was a single-center, retrospective observational chart review of adults admitted to the medical ICU (MICU) between November 2016 and June 2017. The primary aim was the development and internal validation of the MRC-ICU scoring tool. Secondary aims included external validation of the MRC-ICU and exploration of relationships between medication regimen complexity and patient outcomes. Exclusion criteria included a length of stay of less than 24 hours in the MICU, active transfer, or hospice orders at 24 hours. A total of 130 patient medication regimens were used to test, modify, and validate the MRC-ICU tool. Results The 39-line item medication regimen complexity scoring tool was validated both internally and externally. Convergent validity was confirmed with total medications (p < 0.0001). Score discriminant validity was confirmed by lack of association with age (p = 0.1039) or sex (p = 0.7829). The MRC-ICU score was significantly associated with ICU length of stay (p = 0.0166), ICU mortality (p = 0.0193), and patient acuity (p < 0.0001). Conclusion The MRC-ICU scoring tool was validated and found to correlate with length of stay, inpatient mortality, and patient acuity.

Hypophosphatemia and Outcomes in ICU: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

2020 ◽  
pp. 088506662094027
Author(s):  
Jeremy Cheuk Kin Sin ◽  
Lillian King ◽  
Emma Ballard ◽  
Stacey Llewellyn ◽  
Kevin B. Laupland ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Length Of Stay ◽  
Critically Ill ◽  
Critically Ill Patients ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Hospital Length ◽  
Hospital Length Of Stay ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Secondary Outcome ◽  
Icu Length Of Stay ◽  
Newcastle Ottawa Scale

Purpose: Hypophosphatemia is reported in up to 5% of hospitalized patients and ranges from 20% to 80% in critically ill patients. The consequences of hypophosphatemia for critically ill patients remain controversial. We evaluated the effect of hypophosphatemia on mortality and length of stay in intensive care unit (ICU) patients. Methods: MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Library (Reviews and Trials), and PubMed were searched for articles in English. The primary outcome was mortality and secondary outcome was length of stay. The quality of evidence was graded using a modified Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Results: Our search yielded 828 articles and ultimately included 12 studies with 7626 participants in the analysis. Hypophosphatemia was associated with increased hospital length of stay (2.19 days [95% CI, 1.74-2.64]) and ICU length of stay (2.22 days [95% CI, 1.00-3.44]) but not mortality (risk ratio: 1.13 [95% CI, 0.98-1.31]; P = .09). Conclusions: Hypophosphatemia in ICU was associated with increased hospital and ICU length of stay but not all-cause mortality. Hypophosphatemia appears to be a marker of disease severity. Limited number of available studies and varied study designs did not allow for the ascertainment of the effect of severe hypophosphatemia on patient mortality.

Extended Versus Short-Course Corticosteroid Taper Regimens in the Management of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Exacerbations in Critically Ill Patients

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (3) ◽  
pp. 257-263 ◽  
Author(s):  
Teresa Poon ◽  
Daryl Glick Paris ◽  
Samuel L. Aitken ◽  
Paru Patrawalla ◽  
Eric Bondarsky ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Length Of Stay ◽  
Treatment Failure ◽  
Critically Ill ◽  
Critically Ill Patients ◽  
Hospital Length ◽  
Hospital Length Of Stay ◽  
Chronic Obstructive ◽  
Obstructive Pulmonary Disease ◽  
Short Course ◽  
Extended Course

Background: Previous literature has suggested that a short course of corticosteroids is similarly effective as an extended course for managing an acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (AECOPD). However, there are limited data regarding the optimal corticosteroid regimen in critically ill patients and the dosing strategies remain highly variable in this population. Methods: This retrospective cohort study evaluated patients with AECOPD admitted to the intensive care unit within a 2-year period. Patients were divided into short-course (≤5 days) or extended-course (>5 days) corticosteroid taper groups. The primary end point was treatment failure, defined as the need for intubation, reintubation, or noninvasive mechanical ventilation. Secondary end points included the duration of mechanical ventilation, hospital and intensive care unit length of stay, and adverse events. Results: Of the 151 patients who met the inclusion criteria, 94 received an extended taper and 57 received a short taper. Treatment failure occurred in 3 patients, who were all in the extended taper group ( P = .17). In a propensity score-matched cohort, the hospital length of stay was 7 days in the short taper group compared to 11 days in the extended taper group ( P < .0001). No differences in adverse events were observed. Conclusion: A short-course corticosteroid taper in critically ill patients with AECOPD is associated with reduced hospital length of stay and decreased corticosteroid exposure without increased risk of treatment failure. A prospective randomized trial is warranted.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document