scholarly journals Waveform inversion for slip distribution of the 2006 Java tsunami earthquake by using 2.5D finite-difference Green’s function

2009 ◽  
Vol 61 (5) ◽  
pp. e17-e20 ◽  
Author(s):  
Taro Okamoto ◽  
Hiroshi Takenaka
Geophysics ◽  
1998 ◽  
Vol 63 (1) ◽  
pp. 213-222 ◽  
Author(s):  
L. Neil Frazer ◽  
Xinhua Sun

Inversion is an organized search for parameter values that maximize or minimize an objective function, referred to here as a processor. This note derives three new seismic processors that require neither prior deconvolution nor knowledge of the source‐receiver wavelet. The most powerful of these is the fourwise processor, as it is applicable to data sets from multiple shots and receivers even when each shot has a different unknown signature and each receiver has a different unknown impulse response. Somewhat less powerful than the fourwise processor is the pairwise processor, which is applicable to a data set consisting of two or more traces with the same unknown wavelet but possibly different gains. When only one seismogram exists the partition processor can be used. The partition processor is also applicable when there is only one shot (receiver) and each receiver (shot) has a different signature. In fourwise and pairwise inversions the unknown wavelets may be arbitrarily long in time and need not be minimum phase. In partition inversion the wavelet is assumed to be shorter in time than the data trace itself but is not otherwise restricted. None of the methods requires assumptions about the Green’s function.


1984 ◽  
Vol 106 (3) ◽  
pp. 486-490 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. M. Hassanein ◽  
G. L. Kulcinski

The solution of the heat conduction probem in moving boundary conditions is very important in predicting accurate thermal behavior of materials when very high energy deposition is expected. Such high fluxes are encountered on first wall materials and other components in fusion reactors. A numerical method has been developed to solve this problem by the use of the Green’s function. A comparison is made between this method and a finite difference one. The comparison in the finite difference method is made with and without the variation of the thermophysical properties with temperature. The agreement between Green’s function and the finite difference method is found to be very good. The advantages and disadvantages of using the Green’s function method and the importance of the variation of material thermal properties with temperature are discussed.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document