scholarly journals Pilot randomised trial of a healthy eating behavioural intervention in uncontrolled asthma

2015 ◽  
Vol 47 (1) ◽  
pp. 122-132 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jun Ma ◽  
Peg Strub ◽  
Nan Lv ◽  
Lan Xiao ◽  
Carlos A. Camargo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Asthma Control ◽  
Healthy Eating ◽  
Repeated Measures ◽  
Randomised Trial ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Behavioural Intervention ◽  
Life Questionnaire ◽  
Uncontrolled Asthma ◽  
Asthma Control Questionnaire ◽  
Intention To Treat

Rigorous research on the benefit of healthy eating patterns for asthma control is lacking.We randomised 90 adults with objectively confirmed uncontrolled asthma and a low-quality diet (Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension (DASH) scores <6 out of 9) to a 6-month DASH behavioural intervention (n=46) or usual-care control (n=44). Intention-to-treat analyses used repeated-measures mixed models.Participants were middle-aged, 67% female and multiethnic. Compared with controls, intervention participants improved on DASH scores (mean change (95% CI) 0.6 (0, 1.1) versus −0.3 (−0.8, 0.2); difference 0.8 (0.2, 1.5)) and the primary outcome, Asthma Control Questionnaire scores (−0.2 (−0.5, 0) versus 0 (−0.3, 0.3); difference −0.2 (−0.5, 0.1)) at 6 months. The mean group differences in changes in Mini Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire overall and subdomain scores consistently favoured the intervention over the control group: overall 0.4 (95% CI 0, 0.8), symptoms 0.5 (0, 0.9), environment 0.4 (−0.1, 1.0), emotions 0.4 (−0.2, 0.9) and activities 0.3 (0, 0.7). These differences were modest, but potentially clinical significant.The DASH behavioural intervention improved diet quality with promising clinical benefits for better asthma control and functional status among adults with uncontrolled asthma. A full-scale efficacy trial is warranted.

scholarly journals Effects of exercise-based pulmonary rehabilitation on adults with asthma: a systematic review and meta-analysis

2021 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Zhenzhen Feng ◽  
Jiajia Wang ◽  
Yang Xie ◽  
Jiansheng Li
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Pulmonary Rehabilitation ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Life Questionnaire ◽  
Asthma Control Questionnaire ◽  
Clinical Trial Registration ◽  
Domain Scores

Abstract Background Pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) has been proposed as an effective method for many respiratory diseases. However, the effects of exercise-based PR on asthma are currently inconclusive. This review aimed to investigate the effects of exercise-based PR on adults with asthma. Methods The PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, International Clinical Trials Registry Platform and ClinicalTrials.gov databases were searched from inception to 31 July 2019 without language restriction. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) investigating the effects of exercise-based PR on adults with asthma were included. Study selection, data extraction and risk of bias assessment were performed by two investigators independently. Meta-analysis was conducted by RevMan software (version 5.3). Evidence quality was rated by the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) system. Results Ten literatures from nine studies (n = 418 patients) were identified. Asthma quality of life questionnaire total scores (MD = 0.39, 95% CI: 0.02 to 0.76) improved significantly in the experimental group compared to control group, including activity domain scores (MD = 0.58, 95% CI: 0.21 to 0.94), symptom domain scores (MD = 0.52, 95% CI: 0.19 to 0.85), emotion domain scores (MD = 0.53, 95% CI: − 0.03 to 1.09) and environment domain scores (MD = 0.56, 95% CI: 0.00 to 1.11). Both the 6-min walk distance (MD = 34.09, 95% CI: 2.51 to 65.66) and maximum oxygen uptake (MD = 4.45, 95% CI: 3.32 to 5.58) significantly improved. However, improvements in asthma control questionnaire scores (MD = − 0.25, 95% CI: − 0.51 to 0.02) and asthma symptom-free days (MD = 3.35, 95% CI: − 0.21 to 6.90) were not significant. Moreover, there was no significant improvement (MD = 0.10, 95% CI: − 0.08 to 0.29) in forced expiratory volume in 1 s. Nonetheless, improvements in forced vital capacity (MD = 0.23, 95% CI: 0.08 to 0.38) and peak expiratory flow (MD = 0.39, 95% CI: 0.21 to 0.57) were significant. Conclusions Exercise-based PR may improve quality of life, exercise tolerance and some aspects of pulmonary function in adults with asthma and can be considered a supplementary therapy. RCTs of high quality and large sample sizes are required. Clinical trial registration: The review was registered with PROSPERO (The website is https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/, and the ID is CRD42019147107).

scholarly journals Physical Activity and Life Quality in Patients with Asthma and Osteoarthritis

2021 ◽  
Vol 15 (7) ◽  
pp. 2343-2347
Author(s):  
YU. S. Ivanchuk ◽  
L.V. Tribuntсeva ◽  
A.V. Budnevsky ◽  
N.I. Ostroushko ◽  
YA. S. Shkatova ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Physical Activity ◽  
Asthma Control ◽  
Life Quality ◽  
Sitting Time ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Moderate Activity ◽  
Life Questionnaire ◽  
Asthmatic Patients ◽  
Group 2 ◽  
Group 1

Background. Physical activity is associated with better asthma control and life quality in asthma. Osteoarthritis is one of the less studied comorbidities in asthmatic patients. Methods. The study included 38 patients diagnosed with asthma, 65 patients with asthma and osteoarthritis, and 40 volunteers who did not suffer from asthma and osteoarthritis. During the study, 3 groups were formed: Group 1 consisted of patients with asthma; Group 2 included patients with both asthma and osteoarthritis, Control group consisted of volunteers. Spirometry, Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (AQLQ), Asthma Control Test (АСТ) were used in asthmatic patients. International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ) in its short from was filled by all the participants. Results. Both Group 1 and Group 2 did not engage in vigorous physical activity. Median of MET-min/week total (1825) was significantly less in Group 2 compared with Control and Group 1 (p=0.0000 and p=0.0169, respectively). MET-min/week total had positive correlations with ACT (r=0.50, p<0.05), AQLQ(S) total (r=0.58, p<0.05), AQLQ(S) activity domain (r=0.28, p<0.05), AQLQ(S) emotions domain (r=0.24, p<0.05), AQLQ (S) symptoms domain (r=0.34, p<0.05), FVC (r=0,28, p<0.05), FEV1 (r=0,37, p<0.05), Index Tiffno (r=0,18, p<0.05). Minutes/week sitting time had a negative correlation with ACT values (r=-0.33, p<0.05), AQLQ(S) total values (r=-0.39, p<0.05). Conclusion. Patients with asthma and osteoarthritis spend significantly less time on moderate activity, walking compared with asthmatics not suffering from osteoarthritis; they avoid vigorous activity. Higher physical activity is associated with better life quality, asthma control and lung function, thus paying attention to osteoarthritis in asthmatic patients is crucial. Key words: life quality, physical activity, asthma, osteoarthritis

scholarly journals Cryotherapy associated with tailored land-based exercises for knee osteoarthritis: a protocol for a double-blind sham-controlled randomised trial

BMJ Open ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (6) ◽  
pp. e035610 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lucas Ogura Dantas ◽  
Ana Elisa Serafim Jorge ◽  
Paula Regina Mendes da Silva Serrão ◽  
Francisco Aburquerque-Sendín ◽  
Tania de Fatima Salvini
Keyword(s):  
Knee Osteoarthritis ◽  
Short Form ◽  
Randomised Trial ◽  
Unmet Need ◽  
Residual Effects ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Therapeutic Exercise ◽  
Exercise Protocol ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Intention To Treat

IntroductionThere is an unmet need to develop tailored therapeutic exercise protocols applying different treatment parameters and modalities for individuals with knee osteoarthritis (KOA). Cryotherapy is widely used in rehabilitation as an adjunct treatment due to its effects on pain and the inflammatory process. However, disagreement between KOA guidelines remains with respect to its recommendation status. The aim of this study is to verify the complementary effects of cryotherapy when associated with a tailored therapeutic exercise protocol for patients with KOA.Methods and analysisThis study is a sham-controlled randomised trial with concealed allocation and intention-to-treat analysis. Assessments will be performed at baseline and immediately following the intervention period. To check for residual effects of the applied interventions, 3-month and 6-month follow-up assessments will be performed. Participants will be community members living with KOA divided into three groups: (1) the experimental group that will receive a tailored therapeutic exercise protocol followed by a cryotherapy session of 20 min; (2) the sham control group that will receive the same regimen as the first group, but with sham packs filled with dry sand and (3) the active treatment control group that will receive only the therapeutic exercise protocol. The primary outcome will be pain intensity according to a Visual Analogue Scale. Secondary outcomes will be the Western Ontario & McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index; the Short-Form Health Survey 36; the 30-s Chair Stand Test; the Stair Climb test; and the 40-m fast-paced walk test.Ethics and disseminationThe trial was approved by the Institutional Ethics Committee of Federal University of São Carlos, São Paulo, Brazil. Registration approval number: CAAE: 65966617.9.0000.5504. The results will be published in peer-reviewed journals.Trial registration numberNCT03360500

scholarly journals Effects of the Preschool-Based Family-Involving DAGIS Intervention on Family Environment: A Cluster Randomised Trial

Nutrients ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (11) ◽  
pp. 3387
Author(s):  
Carola Ray ◽  
Rejane Figueiredo ◽  
Riikka Pajulahti ◽  
Henna Vepsäläinen ◽  
Elviira Lehto ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Family Environment ◽  
Interaction Effect ◽  
Repeated Measures ◽  
Randomised Trial ◽  
Intervention Group ◽  
Cluster Randomised Trial ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Intervention Effects ◽  
Role Modelling ◽  
The Family

Interventions promoting young children’s healthy energy balance-related behaviours (EBRBs) should also examine changes in the family environment as this is an important determinant that may affect the effectiveness of the intervention. This study examines family environmental effects of the Increased Health and Wellbeing in Preschools (DAGIS) intervention study, and whether these effects differed when considering three parental educational level (PEL) groups. The DAGIS intervention was conducted in preschools and involving parents in Southern Finland from September 2017 to May 2018. It was designed as a randomised trial, clustered at preschool-level. Parents of 3–6-year-olds answered questionnaires recording PEL, parental role modelling for EBRBs, and the family environment measured as EBRBs availability and accessibility. Linear Mixed Models with Repeated Measures were used in order to detect intervention effects. Models included group by time interactions. When examining intervention effects separated by PEL groups, models with three-level interactions (group × time-points × PEL) were evaluated. There was an interaction effect for the availability of sugary everyday foods and drinks (p = 0.002). The analyses showed that the control group increased availability (p = 0.003), whereas in the intervention group no changes were detected (p = 0.150). In the analysis separated by PEL groups, changes were found only for the accessibility of sugary treats at home; the high PEL control group increased the accessibility of sugary treats (p = 0.022) (interaction effect: p = 0.027). Hence, results suggest that the DAGIS multicomponent intervention had a limited impact on determinants for children’s healthy EBRBs, and no impact was found in the low PEL group.

scholarly journals Tracing Uncontrolled Asthma in Family Practice Using a Mailed Asthma Control Questionnaire

2008 ◽  
Vol 6 (suppl_1) ◽  
pp. S16-S22 ◽  
Author(s):  
L. van den Nieuwenhof ◽  
T. Schermer ◽  
M. Heins ◽  
J. Grootens ◽  
P. Eysink ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Asthma Control ◽  
Family Practice ◽  
Uncontrolled Asthma ◽  
Asthma Control Questionnaire

scholarly journals Relation of Asthma Control with Quality of Life among a Sample of Egyptian Asthmatic School Children

2019 ◽  
Vol 7 (17) ◽  
pp. 2780-2785
Author(s):  
Hala G. Elnady ◽  
Lobna S. Sherif ◽  
Rania N. Sabry ◽  
Dina Abu Zeid ◽  
Hanan Atta ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Asthma Control ◽  
Asthma Severity ◽  
Physical Symptoms ◽  
Life Questionnaire ◽  
Asthma Control Questionnaire ◽  
Asthmatic Children ◽  
Asthmatic Patients ◽  
Egyptian Children

BACKGROUND: Asthma is considered a chronic health illness that not only resulted in physical symptoms but also emotional effects. It is; therefore, so important to assess the quality of life of asthmatic patients besides their level of disease control. AIM: To determine the correlation of asthma control with the health-related quality of life (HRQOL) of asthmatic children in Egypt. METHODS: One hundred and twenty-eight asthmatic Egyptian children were enrolled in the study. They were subjected to asthma severity grading, asthma control questionnaire (ACQ) and pediatric asthma quality of life questionnaire (PAQLQ). Studied cases were taken from 6 primary and preparatory schools, Giza governorate. RESULTS: The mean child control score was significantly higher in not well-controlled asthmatics compared to well-controlled asthmatics (p < 0.005). The not well controlled asthmatic children showed significantly lower activity limitation score, symptoms score, and overall asthmatic score compared to controlled asthmatic children (p < 0.05). The severity of asthma shows significant positive correlation with symptoms score, emotional function score and overall asthmatic score (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: The quality of life for the asthmatic children is strongly correlated with the level of asthma control and severity.

scholarly journals Clinical, functional and inflammatory evaluation in asthmatic patients after a simple short-term educational program: a randomized trial

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Soraia Nogueira Felix ◽  
Rosana Camara Agondi ◽  
Marcelo Vivolo Aun ◽  
Clarice Rosa Olivo ◽  
Francine Maria de Almeida ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Asthma Control ◽  
Educational Intervention ◽  
Intervention Group ◽  
Educational Activity ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Life Questionnaire ◽  
Asthmatic Patients ◽  
Quality Life

Abstract This study aimed to evaluate the clinical evolution, functional parameters and inflammatory activity of asthma in patients who submitted to an educational intervention. 58 adult patients over 18 years of age with partly controlled and uncontrolled asthma were randomized into an intervention group (IG) (N = 32) and a control group (CG) (N = 26) and evaluated for 12 weeks. The Asthma Control Test (ACT), Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ), Asthma Quality Life Questionnaire (AQLQ) and Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) questionnaires were applied. Spirometry, exhaled nitric oxide (NO), exhaled breath condensate (EBC) and induced sputum (IS), measurement of the peak flow and symptoms were performed. The IG patients received an educational activity for 30 minutes applied by a nurse. Statistical analysis: analysis of variance with repeated intragroup measures. IG presented a decreased number of eosinophils in IS and IL-17A in EBC, an increase in the percentage of FEV1 after bronchodilatation and an improvement in quality of life compared to the CG. There was an improvement in depression levels and a decrease in IL-4 and IL-5 in the IS and in the EBC in the IG compared to the CG. Our results suggest that an educational intervention can bring benefits concerning the control of inflammation, lung function alterations, quality of life and levels of depression in asthmatic patients. Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov; NCT03655392.

scholarly journals Effect of exacerbation history on clinical response to dupilumab in moderate-severe uncontrolled asthma

2021 ◽  
pp. 2004498
Author(s):  
Jonathan Corren ◽  
Constance H. Katelaris ◽  
Mario Castro ◽  
Jorge F. Maspero ◽  
Linda B. Ford ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Asthma Control ◽  
Forced Expiratory Volume ◽  
Severe Exacerbation ◽  
Uncontrolled Asthma ◽  
Phase 3 ◽  
Asthma Control Questionnaire ◽  
Elevated Type ◽  
Post Hoc ◽  
Blood Eosinophils

BackgroundThe phase 3 QUEST study (NCT02414854) in patients with uncontrolled, moderate-to-severe asthma has demonstrated the efficacy and safety of dupilumab 200 and 300 mg every 2 weeks versus placebo. This post hoc analysis assessed the effect of dupilumab on efficacy outcomes and asthma control across a range of historical exacerbation rates in patients with type 2−high asthma.MethodsAnnualised severe exacerbation rates over the 52-week treatment period, pre-bronchodilator forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) at weeks 12/52, and the 5-item Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ-5) score at 24/52 were assessed in patients with ≥1, ≥2, or ≥3 exacerbations in the previous year. Subgroups were stratified by baseline blood eosinophils ≥150 or ≥300 cells·μL−1 or baseline fractional exhaled nitric oxide ≥25 ppb and baseline inhaled corticosteroid dose.ResultsAcross all type 2−high subgroups, dupilumab versus placebo significantly reduced severe exacerbations by 54 to 90%, with greater improvements in patients with more exacerbations prior to study initiation. Similarly, improvements in FEV1 (least squares [LS] difference versus placebo: ≥1 exacerbation, 0.15 to 0.25 L; ≥2 exacerbations, 0.12 to 0.32 L; ≥3 exacerbations, 0.09 to 0.38 L; majority p<0.05) and ACQ-5 score (LS mean difference range: ≥1 exacerbation, −0.30 to −0.57; ≥2 exacerbations, −0.29 to −0.56; ≥3 exacerbations, −0.43 to −0.61; all p<0.05) were observed, irrespective of prior exacerbation history, across all subgroups.ConclusionsDupilumab significantly reduced severe exacerbations and improved FEV1 and asthma control in patients with elevated type 2 biomarkers irrespective of exacerbation history and baseline ICS dose.

scholarly journals Evaluation of Asthma Control by Physicians and Patients: Comparison with Current Guidelines

2002 ◽  
Vol 9 (6) ◽  
pp. 417-423 ◽  
Author(s):  
Louis-Philippe Boulet ◽  
Robert Phillips ◽  
Paul O’Byrne ◽  
Allan Becker
Keyword(s):  
Asthma Control ◽  
Airflow Obstruction ◽  
Ordinal Scale ◽  
Consensus Guidelines ◽  
Uncontrolled Asthma ◽  
Treatment Needs ◽  
Night Time ◽  
Asthma Control Questionnaire ◽  
Current Asthma ◽  
Current Guidelines

BACKGROUND:Current asthma consensus guidelines recommend a series of criteria for determining whether asthma is controlled. It is not known whether physicians are using these criteria to assess treatment needs and how effective such assessments are compared with patient assessment of asthma control.OBJECTIVE: To compare the parameters used by physicians and patients with asthma to determine whether asthma control is acceptable, according to the current Canadian asthma consensus guidelines.DATA AND METHODS: A total of 183 Canadian physicians, mostly general practitioners, evaluated 856 patients with mildly to moderately uncontrolled asthma who were not using anti-inflammatory medications at the time of entry in the study. Physician characteristics and patient demographics were obtained. The physicians completed two questionnaires, one assessing the level of asthma control of the patient on an ordinal scale from 1 (very poor) to 5 (very good) and another indicating the parameters that were used to evaluate this level of control. Patients answered an asthma control questionnaire identical to the one completed by the physician and completed a six-question asthma control questionnaire, with each question scored on a 0- to 6-point scale.RESULTS: Although according to current asthma guidelines all patients surveyed had uncontrolled asthma, 66.2% of patients and 43.3% of physicians rated control of asthma symptoms as adequate to very good. The average scores for patient- and physician-rated asthma control were 3.0±0.2 and 2.6±0.2, respectively. The average patient score on the Juniper asthma questionnaire was 12.2±6.3. Physicians used a mean of seven parameters to assess the patient’s level of asthma control, mostly beta2-agonist need, followed by cough, wheezing, shortness of breath, limitation of physical activities and night-time awakenings. Pediatricians used cough more frequently as an evaluation parameter, and respirologists measured pulmonary function more often than other physcians. Some parameters not usually included in guideline criteria for control, such as fatigue, need to clear throat, colored sputum, headache and dizziness, were sometimes used by physicians. Only 10% and 18% of physicians used measurements of forced expiratory volume in 1 s and peak expiratory flow, respectively, in asthma control assessments.CONCLUSIONS: The present study shows that the selection of asthma control criteria among physicians varies and is not always in keeping with current asthma guidelines. Both patients and physicians often consider asthma to be controlled, when according to current guidelines, it is not, and patients consider their asthma better controlled than do physicians. Objective measures of airflow obstruction are rarely used to assess asthma control. The present study stresses the need for improved dissemination - to both patients and physicians - of current recommendations on how asthma control should be determined.

scholarly journals A 1-day visit in a severe asthma centre: effect on asthma control, quality of life and healthcare use

2016 ◽  
Vol 48 (3) ◽  
pp. 726-733 ◽  
Author(s):  
Akke-Nynke van der Meer ◽  
Henk Pasma ◽  
Wilma Kempenaar-Okkema ◽  
Jo-Anneke Pelinck ◽  
Myrte Schutten ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Asthma Control ◽  
Severe Asthma ◽  
Life Questionnaire ◽  
Healthcare Use ◽  
Uncontrolled Asthma ◽  
Control Quality ◽  
Asthma Patients

Patients with uncontrolled asthma report ongoing symptoms, poor quality-of-life and extensive healthcare use (HCU) and might benefit from management by a specialised severe asthma team. It is unknown whether a one-time evaluation by asthma experts, without long-term supervision by a specialised team, provides favourable outcomes. We evaluated asthma control (Asthma Control Questionnaire; ACQ), quality-of-life (Asthma-related Quality of Life Questionnaire; AQLQ) and HCU before and 1 year after a 1-day visit programme in a severe asthma centre, including a multidisciplinary assessment resulting in a personalised management plan to be implemented by patients own pulmonologists.40 uncontrolled asthma patients completed questionnaires (ACQ, AQLQ, HCU) at baseline, and 6 and 12 months follow-up.ACQ improved from 2.6 (interquartile range 1.7–3.2) to 1.8 (1.2–3.2) (p=0.003) and AQLQ from 4.8 (4.0–5.2) to 5.3 (4.4–6.0) (p<0.001). We found a reduction in patients with ≥2 exacerbations (95% versus 17%; p<0.001), ≥1 emergency room visit (78% versus 37%; p<0.001) and ≥1 hospitalisation (47% versus 10%; p=0.001).Evaluation of uncontrolled asthma patients in a 1-day visit programme in a severe asthma centre resulted in significant improvements in asthma control, quality-of-life and healthcare use after 1 year. This 1-day visit approach seems beneficial for uncontrolled asthma patients and might reduce their dependence on expensive treatment modalities and long-term management in specialised centres.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document