Reading William Bittle and Charles Brant: On Ethnographic Representations of “Contemporary” Plains Apache

2007 ◽  
Vol 52 (203) ◽  
pp. 301-315 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anthony K. Webster
Keyword(s):  
2002 ◽  
Vol 32 (1) ◽  
pp. 105-112 ◽  
Author(s):  
Siri G. Tuttle ◽  
Merton Sandoval

Jicarilla Apache is an Eastern Apachean language, a member of the Athabaskan family of North American languages. The speech described here is that of one of the authors, Merton Sandoval of Dulce, New Mexico. The Apachean group is comprised of Western Apachean (Navajo; the Western Apache dialects Cibecue, San Carlos, and White Mountain; and Chiricahua and Mescalero) Eastern Apachean (Jicarilla, Lipan) and Plains Apache (formerly called Kiowa Apache). The other major groups of Athabaskan languages include the northern group of languages spoken in Alaska and Canada, and the Pacific Coast group spoken in Oregon and California. While the western Apachean languages have a well-documented member in Navajo, the eastern group is less well known, being best documented so far in the works of Goddard (1911), Hoijer (1938, 1945, 1946a, 1946b) and Jung (1999). Differences between the western and eastern groups concentrate in consonant development and the evolution of stem shape, and, to some extent, in the lexicon; however, Jicarilla resembles all other Athabaskan languages in bearing a close morphological relationship to all its relatives.


2009 ◽  
Vol 47 (03) ◽  
pp. 47-1503-47-1503
Keyword(s):  

2009 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 138-139
Author(s):  
William Meadows
Keyword(s):  

Author(s):  
Nancy Adele ◽  
Timothy K. Perttula

In a recent volume of the Caddoan Archeology Newsletter, Daniel Hickerson argues that Apache aggression across the Southern Plains, Apache trade in horses and other European goods, and European-introduced diseases dramatically affected Caddo an populations by encouraging their migration south to the upper Neches/Angelina river basins area traditionally occupied by one segment of the Caddo, the Hasinai groups. In his opinion, the Hasinai confederacy was a nascent chiefdom that developed as a direct result of this mid to late-seventeenth century southern migration. As has been pointed out by Caddoan ethnographers, ethnohistorians, and archeologists for 50 years or more, the Caddo were affected by a number of historical processes that resulted from the European exploration and settlement of the New World, and we would agree with Hickerson that these are worthy of study and continual reexamination. However, it is our view that Hickerson's consideration of historical processes has only dealt with a fraction of the available archeological and archival/documentary literature on the Caddo peoples, and this reliance on a limited sample of this material has led to a portrayal of Apache aggression and its effects on the Caddo populations in eastern Texas that is overdrawn and misleading. Furthermore, Hickerson incorrectly characterizes the limitations of the eastern Texas environment, leading to depictions of the region, as an impenetrable forest that stood as a defensive barrier, that do not stand up to scrutiny. Finally, a failure to differentiate between the Caddo and Southern Plains Caddoan-speakers causes Hickerson to inappropriately attribute to the Caddo the effects of Apache hostilities directed against the Pawnee and Wichita, close tribal allies.


1977 ◽  
Vol 44 (1) ◽  
pp. 74-75
Keyword(s):  

2008 ◽  
Vol 74 (2) ◽  
pp. 257-261
Author(s):  
Anthony K. Webster
Keyword(s):  

Ethnohistory ◽  
1976 ◽  
Vol 23 (1) ◽  
pp. 91
Author(s):  
Martha C. Knack ◽  
John Upton Terrell
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document