Direct Bonding in Orthodontics: A Comparison of Attachments

1977 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. 65-69 ◽  
Author(s):  
I. R. Reynolds ◽  
J. A. von Fraunhofer

The tensile bond strengths to human enamel of metallic and non-metallic direct bonding attachments used with their recommended adhesives are reported. The results obtained are compared and contrasted and the findings are discussed in relation to clinical practice.

1976 ◽  
Vol 55 (3) ◽  
pp. 411-418 ◽  
Author(s):  
J.B. Moser ◽  
D.B. Dowling ◽  
E.H. Greener ◽  
G.W. Marshall

Tensile bond strengths between five orthodontic cements and acid-etched enamel were studied. The influence of a saline primer and storage in artificial saliva at 37 C for up to 30 days was evaluated. Statistically significant differences were found for different cements, time of storage, and the effect of silane pretreatment on etched enamel.


2008 ◽  
Vol 02 (03) ◽  
pp. 167-175 ◽  
Author(s):  
Abdulkadir Sengun ◽  
Hasan Orucoglu ◽  
Ilknur Ipekdal ◽  
Fusun Ozer

ABSTRACTObjectives: The purpose of this in vitro study was to evaluate whether mechanical alteration of the enamel surfaces with air abrasion and bur abrasion techniques could enhance the bonding performance of a three step and a self etching adhesive resin systems to enamel.Methods: 126 extracted lower human incisor teeth were used. The teeth were divided into three groups including 40 teeth each. First group; teeth were used as control and no preparation was made on enamel surfaces, 2nd group; outer enamel surfaces were air abraded, 3rd group; outer enamel surfaces were abraded mechanically with a diamond fissure bur. Cylinder composite resin blocks were bonded to the buccal enamel surfaces with two bonding systems (20 specimens in each group). Bond strengths to enamel surfaces were measured at a cross-head speed of 1 mm/min. The data were analyzed by ANOVA and Duncan Tests. To examine interface composite resin/enamel surfaces at scanning electron microscopy, remaining 6 teeth were used. Fracture analysis was performed using an optical stereomicroscope.Results: Bond strengths values of Solid Bond were significantly higher than bond strengths of Clearfil SE Bond for all types of enamel (P<.05). Shear bond strength values obtained with Solid Bond (three step system) to three types of enamel surfaces [air-abraded (30.25±7.00 MPa), bur-abraded (29.07±3.53 MPa), control (31.74±7.35 MPa)] were close to each other (P>.05). The macroscopic mode of failures for bonding systems, SB and SE Bond appeared to be adhesive and cohesive in nature.Conclusions: In order to get better bond strength values with self etching systems, it is advisable to prepare enamel surfaces with bur or air abrasion, but it enamel preparation is not necessary for three step systems. (Eur J Dent 2008;2:167-175)


1999 ◽  
Vol 81 (5) ◽  
pp. 510-514 ◽  
Author(s):  
Merrie H. Ramp ◽  
Donna L. Dixon ◽  
Lance C. Ramp ◽  
Larry C. Breeding ◽  
Lindsay L. Barber

2019 ◽  
Vol 38 (2) ◽  
pp. 218-225 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nazmiye DÖNMEZ ◽  
Ayça Sarıalioğlu GÜNGÖR ◽  
Barış KARABULUT ◽  
Şeyda Hergüner SİSO

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document