scholarly journals Subthreshold micropulse laser adjuvant to bevacizumab versus bevacizumab monotherapy in treating diabetic macular edema: one- year- follow-up

2021 ◽  
Vol 13 ◽  
pp. 251584142110408
Author(s):  
Leila El Matri ◽  
Ahmed Chebil ◽  
Khaled El Matri ◽  
Yousra Falfoul ◽  
Zouheir Chebbi
Keyword(s):  
Macular Edema ◽  
Diabetic Macular Edema ◽  
Intravitreal Injections ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Diabetic Patients ◽  
Micropulse Laser ◽  
Treatment Naïve ◽  
The Difference ◽  
Retrospective Comparative Study

Purpose: To compare the therapeutic impact of combining intravitreal injections of bevacizumab (IVB) with micropulse laser (MPL) in central diffuse diabetic macular edema (DME) versus IVB monotherapy during 12 months follow-up. Methods: We conducted a retrospective comparative study of 98 treatment-naive eyes (63 patients) with central diffuse DME. The first group of patients (IVB + MPL group, n = 49) was treated with 3 monthly IVB followed by MPL within 1 week after the third injection. Patients were then followed and treated on a pro re nata (PRN) basis, with MPL retreatment if necessary. The changes in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), central macular thickness (CMT), number of IVB injections and MPL sessions were evaluated at 4, 8, and 12 months. A control group of diabetic patients with treatment-naive DME was treated with standard protocol of 3 monthly IVB as monotherapy then followed on a PRN basis (IVB group, n = 49). Statistic comparaison of BCVA, CMT, and IVB number variation was interpreted at 12 months between both groups. Results: In IVB + MPL group, baseline BCVA improvement was not significant at 4 and 8 months ( p = 0.90, p = 0.08), and was statistically significant ( p = 0.01) at 12 months. Mean CMT significantly decreased at 4, 8, and 12 months ( p < 0.01) in IVB + MPL group. The difference in BCVA (p = 0.091) and CMT (p = 0.082) variation at 12 months between both groups was not significant but the number of injections was significantly lower in IVB + MPL group (4.1 ± 1.5 injections) compared to IVB group (7.2 ± 1.3 injections) ( p < 0.005). Conclusion: Combining intravitreal injections of bevacizumab and MPL in the treatment of DME is effective and safe. This protocol may decrease the number of IVB and its frequency. It offers the advantage of lasting therapeutic response with fewer recurrences.

Subthreshold micropulse laser reduces anti-VEGF injection burden in patients with diabetic macular edema

2017 ◽  
Vol 28 (1) ◽  
pp. 68-73 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elad Moisseiev ◽  
Sam Abbassi ◽  
Sumeer Thinda ◽  
Joseph Yoon ◽  
Glenn Yiu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Macular Edema ◽  
Diabetic Macular Edema ◽  
Matched Control ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Vascular Endothelial ◽  
Micropulse Laser ◽  
Anti Vegf ◽  
Retrospective Comparative Study ◽  
Endothelial Growth Factor

Purpose: To evaluate the efficacy of micropulse laser in the early treatment of diabetic macular edema (DME) and its associated burden of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) injections. Methods: This retrospective comparative study compared a group of 19 eyes with DME treated with micropulse laser to a matched control group of 19 eyes with DME treated with ranibizumab injections without micropulse laser. Recorded parameters included previous medical and ocular history, previous and subsequent ranibizumab injections administered for DME, visual acuity (VA), central macular thickness throughout the follow-up period, and the occurrence of any complications. Results: The improvement in VA was comparable in both groups, at 12 months and at the final follow-up. Patients treated with micropulse laser required significantly fewer ranibizumab injections than their controls, both at 12 months (1.7 ± 2.3 vs 5.6 ± 2.1) and by the end of the follow-up (2.6 ± 3.3 vs 9.3 ± 5.1) (p<0.001 for both). No complications related to the micropulse laser were encountered. Conclusions: Micropulse laser is a safe and effective treatment for DME, which may achieve comparable improvement in VA along with a significant reduction in the burden of anti-VEGF injections. We suggest a treatment approach for its inclusion in the early stages of DME.

scholarly journals Visual/anatomical outcome of diabetic macular edema patients lost to follow-up for more than 1 year

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ji Soo Kim ◽  
Seungheon Lee ◽  
Jin Young Kim ◽  
Eoi Jong Seo ◽  
Ju Byung Chae ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Visual Acuity ◽  
Macular Edema ◽  
Diabetic Macular Edema ◽  
Poor Response ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Anti Vegf ◽  
Treatment Naïve ◽  
Lost To Follow Up ◽  
Anatomical Outcome

AbstractTo investigate the visual/anatomical outcome of diabetic macular edema (DME) patients lost to follow-up (LTFU) for more than 1 year during intravitreal anti-VEGF treatment. A retrospective review of 182 treatment-naïve DME patients was performed. Among them, we identified patients LTFU for more than 1 year during anti-VEGF treatment. Visual acuity and anatomic outcomes at the first visit, last visit before being LTFU, return visit, and after re-treatment were analyzed and compared with those of DME patients with regular follow-up. Patients who had continuous follow-up visits were assigned to the control group. Sixty patients (33%) with DME were LTFU for more than 1 year during anti-VEGF treatment. Multivariate analysis revealed that the ratio of male (p = 0.004), diabetes mellitus (DM) duration less than 5 years (p = 0.015), and poor early anatomic response (p = 0.012) were higher compared to the control group. Eighteen patients returned to the clinic and received re-treatment. After re-treatment with anti-VEGF, central subfield thickness (CST) was significantly improved to the CST of before LTFU. However, visual acuity did not recover to the level before LTFU (0.63 ± 0.26 vs. 0.45 ± 0.28, p = 0.003). About thirty percent of DME patients were LTFU for more than 1 year. Permanent visual loss was observed in these LTFU patients. Patients with a high risk of LTFU such as male, early DM, and poor response after initial injections should be treated more aggressively to improve the visual outcomes.

scholarly journals Patient Preferences with Regard to Laser versus Intravitreal Injections in the Treatment of Diabetic Macular Edema

2017 ◽  
Vol 2017 ◽  
pp. 1-4 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lauren Mason ◽  
Jason N. Crosson ◽  
John O. Mason ◽  
Gerald McGwin
Keyword(s):  
Macular Edema ◽  
Diabetic Macular Edema ◽  
Treatment Effectiveness ◽  
Intravitreal Injections ◽  
Treatment Preference ◽  
Treatment Preferences ◽  
Diabetic Patients ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Injection Anxiety

Purpose. To identify treatment preferences of patients with diabetic macular edema (DME) having undergone laser and intravitreal injections. Methods. Patients with DME who received lasers and injections were surveyed, measuring preferences toward specific treatments. 66/210 diabetic patients met the criteria for our survey assessing preference for lasers and/or injections, incorporating demographics and treatment preference questions. Outcome measures included treatment preference (laser or injections), how often patients are willing to be treated, and how much vision they will sacrifice to avoid being treated every month. Results. 66 patients completed the survey. The mean diabetes duration was 20.7 years, the mean retina follow-up was 4.4 years, and patients received a mean of 4.82 lasers and 4.86 injections. 56% preferred injections, 33% preferred laser, and 11% had no preference. Regarding treatment effectiveness, 38% found no difference, 36% chose laser, and 25% chose injections. Regarding anxiety, 56% reported injection anxiety. While 50% versus 38% reported that laser was easier than injections. 91% would give up zero lines on the eye chart, and 76% would come in 12 times yearly for treatment to maintain vision. Conclusion. Patients with DME have no profound preference regarding laser versus intravitreal injections but prefer aggressive treatment and are unwilling to sacrifice vision for less visits.

Evaluation of retinal inflammatory biomarkers after intravitreal steroid implant and Ranibizumab injection in diabetic macular edema

2021 ◽  
pp. 112067212110294
Author(s):  
Ilkay Kilic Muftuoglu ◽  
Ecem Onder Tokuc ◽  
Fatma Sümer ◽  
V Levent Karabas
Keyword(s):  
Macular Edema ◽  
Diabetic Macular Edema ◽  
Outer Nuclear Layer ◽  
Plexiform Layer ◽  
Retinal Layer ◽  
Treatment Naïve ◽  
The Mean ◽  
The Individual ◽  
Inflammatory Component

Purpose: To compare the efficacy of intravitreal (IV) ranibizumab (IVR) injection with IV dexamethasone implant (IVDEX) in treatment naive diabetic macular edema (DME) patients with inflammatory component. Materials and methods: Treatment naive DME eyes with subfoveal neurosensorial detachment (SND) and hyperreflective spots (HRS) were treated either three loading doses of IVR (18 eyes) or one dose of IVDEX (19 eyes). Central macular thickness (CMT), height of SND, the number of HRSs scattered on the individual retinal layers and photoreceptor integrity were assessed using spectral domain- optical coherence tomography scans over 3-months follow-up. Results: The mean change in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) was −0.11 ± 0.08 logMAR in IVDEX group and −0.04 ± 0.06 logMAR in IVR group at 1-month ( p = 0.011). IVDEX group showed statistically significant more increase in BCVA compared to those receiving IVR injections at 2-months ( p = 0.004) and 3-months ( p = 0.017) visits. Compared to baseline, the number of total HRSs and the number of HRSs at each individual inner retinal layer significantly decreased in both groups at all follow-up visits. However, IVDEX group showed more decrease in the total number of HRSs at 2- and 3-months ( p < 0.001 at 2-months, and p = 0.006 at 3-months) and in the mean number of HRSs located at inner nuclear layer–outer plexiform layer level ( p = 0.016 at 1-month, p < 0.001 at 2-months, and p < 0.001 at 3-months). After treatment, the number of HRSs on the outer nuclear layer showed some non-significant increase in both groups. Conclusion: HRSs tended to migrate from inner retina to the outer retina in DME eyes by treatment. Dexamethasone seemed to be more effective option in such cases with inflammatory component.

scholarly journals Micropulse laser in patients with refractory and treatment-naïve center–involved diabetic macular edema: short terms visual and anatomic outcomes

2021 ◽  
Vol 13 ◽  
pp. 251584142097911
Author(s):  
Diego Alejandro Valera-Cornejo ◽  
Marlon García-Roa ◽  
Jaime Quiroz-Mendoza ◽  
Alejandro Arias-Gómez ◽  
Paulina Ramírez-Neria ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Visual Acuity ◽  
Macular Edema ◽  
Diabetic Macular Edema ◽  
Macular Thickness ◽  
Thickness Change ◽  
Macular Volume ◽  
Naive Group ◽  
Micropulse Laser ◽  
Refractory Diabetic Macular Edema ◽  
Treatment Naïve

Purpose: The purpose of the study is to describe visual and anatomic outcomes of 5774nm micropulse laser photocoagulation in eyes with either treatment-naïve or refractory diabetic macular edema (DME) at 3 months. Methods: This was a prospective case series that recruited 23 consecutive patients (33 eyes) with center-involved DME that was either treatment-naïve or had not responded to prior treatment. Micropulse therapy was performed with the Easy Ret 577 (Quantel Medical, Cournon d’Auvergne, France) diode laser in a high-density manner in eyes with treatment-naïve or refractory DME. The primary outcome was the change of best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA; logMAR) at 1 and 3 months. Secondary outcomes were changes in the central macular thickness (CMT), thickness area, macular volume, and macular capillary leakage at 1 and 3 months. Results: There were no significant changes in BCVA at 3 months, with mean ± standard deviation (SD) of −0.08 ± 0.01 ( p = 0.228) and + 0.01 ± 0.01 ( p = 0.969) for treatment-naïve and refractory groups, respectively. The change in CMT at 3 months was statistically but not clinically significant in the treatment-naïve group only (mean ± SD; –30 ± 130 µm; p = 0.011). The macular volume and area thickness change were not statistically significant ( p = 0.173 and p = 0.148 for macular volume and area thickness, respectively) in the treatment-naïve group. There was no difference concerning the leakage area in both groups. No adverse events were reported. Conclusion: We concluded that micropulse 577nm laser therapy maintained the visual acuity and macular thickness at 3 months in both treatment-naïve and refractory DME.

scholarly journals Comparison of Intravitreal Aflibercept and Ranibizumab following Initial Treatment with Ranibizumab in Persistent Diabetic Macular Edema

2018 ◽  
Vol 2018 ◽  
pp. 1-5 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ali Demircan ◽  
Zeynep Alkin ◽  
Ceren Yesilkaya ◽  
Gokhan Demir ◽  
Burcu Kemer
Keyword(s):  
Macular Edema ◽  
Diabetic Macular Edema ◽  
Medical Records ◽  
Poor Response ◽  
Intravitreal Aflibercept ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Retrospective Comparative Study ◽  
Switch Group ◽  
Persistent Diabetic Macular Edema

Purpose. To compare the visual and anatomic outcomes in patients with persistent diabetic macular edema (DME) who switched from ranibizumab to aflibercept with those who continued with previous ranibizumab therapy. Methods. In this retrospective comparative study, medical records of consecutive patients with center-involved DME ≥ 350 μm who had at least three recent consecutive monthly ranibizumab injections followed by as-needed therapy with either aflibercept or ranibizumab were reviewed. Data were collected at presentation (preinjection), at the intermediary visit, and at the last visit (at the end of the follow-up period). Results. Forty-three eyes of 43 patients were divided into two groups: the switch group (n=20) and the ranibizumab group (n=23). Though no significant improvement was found in the mean BCVA from the intermediary visit to the last visit, there was a difference in the mean CMT in the switch group and the ranibizumab group (p<0.001 and p=0.03, resp.). The mean CMT decreased after the intermediary visit by 188.6 ± 120.5 μm in the switch group and by 60.3 ± 117.1 μm in the ranibizumab group (p=0.003). Conclusions. Both aflibercept and ranibizumab decreased CMT in patients with persistent DME who showed a poor response to ranibizumab injections. However, switching to aflibercept provided only morphologic improvement.

Efficacy and safety of intravitreal dexamethasone implant in treatment naïve eyes with diabetic macular edema: Real world experience

2020 ◽  
pp. 112067212094976
Author(s):  
Dhanashree Ratra ◽  
Unnati Sharma ◽  
Daleena Dalan
Keyword(s):  
Macular Edema ◽  
Diabetic Macular Edema ◽  
Dexamethasone Implant ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Visual Improvement ◽  
Intravitreal Dexamethasone Implant ◽  
Treatment Naïve ◽  
Intravitreal Dexamethasone ◽  
Macular Ischemia

Purpose: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of intravitreal dexamethasone implant in treatment naïve eyes with diabetic macular edema (DME). Methods: A retrospective analysis of treatment naïve eyes with DME which received intravitreal dexamethasone implant between January 2016 and March 2018 was done. Demographic details of the patients, ocular examination findings at baseline and on follow up visits were noted. Morphological features of DME and central macular thickness were noted on optical coherence tomography at each visit. The details regarding additional treatment for macular edema on follow up were noted. Results: Sixty five eyes were included in the study. The mean age was 59.14 ± 9.59 years. The follow up ranged from 6 to 48 months. Psuedophakic eyes showed visual improvement whereas the phakic eyes showed stable vision. The central foveal thickness showed significant reduction ( p = 0.05) in all the eyes. The best corrected visual acuity at final follow up (+0.65 logMAR) was slightly less as compared to baseline (+0.62 logMAR). Retreatment was needed in 37% eyes and antiglaucoma medications in 8% eyes. Cataract progression was noted in 24 eyes (37%); 17 eyes (26.1%) underwent surgery. Notably, 27 eyes (41.5%) had some degree of macular ischemia at baseline. And five eyes (7.7%) showed progression of retinopathy leading to vitreous hemorrhage. Conclusion: Dexamethasone implant is helpful in reducing the macular thickness and stabilizing the vision in treatment naïve DME; requiring less number of treatment sessions. However, it does not prevent progression of diabetic retinopathy. The visual improvement may be affected by cataract and macular ischemia.

Ranibizumab for Persistent Diabetic Macular Edema after Bevacizumab Treatment

2016 ◽  
Vol 27 (2) ◽  
pp. 210-214 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gabriel Katz ◽  
Elad Moisseiev ◽  
Dafna Goldenberg ◽  
Joseph Moisseiev ◽  
Yosef Lomnicky ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Visual Acuity ◽  
Macular Edema ◽  
Diabetic Macular Edema ◽  
Retinal Thickness ◽  
Significant Gain ◽  
Bevacizumab Treatment ◽  
The Mean ◽  
The Difference ◽  
Persistent Diabetic Macular Edema

Purpose To evaluate the efficacy of switching from bevacizumab to ranibizumab in patients with diabetic macular edema (DME). Methods This was a retrospective study of patients with DME initially treated with bevacizumab and switched to ranibizumab. Visual acuity (VA) and central retinal thickness (CRT) were retrieved at fixed timepoints prior to and after the switch. Results Forty eyes of 32 patients were included in the study. The difference in VA between any of these fixed timepoints was not statistically significant. A significant gain in VA was found in eyes that lost more than 0.1 logMAR during treatment with the last 3 bevacizumab injections. The mean CRT was significantly lower after the first 3 ranibizumab injections and at the final follow-up (p<0.001), a 67 ± 14 μm and 78 ± 18 μm reduction in thickness, respectively. Conclusions Switching to ranibizumab resulted in a significant decrease in the CRT of eyes with DME, and should be considered when there is a lack of response or deterioration while on bevacizumab injections. A significant gain in VA was observed in a subgroup of eyes that lost more than one line while receiving the last 3 bevacizumab injections prior to the switch.

The effect of recurrent povidone-iodine usage on conjunctival flora in diabetic patients undergoing intravitreal injections

2020 ◽  
pp. 112067212090203
Author(s):  
Adi Einan-Lifshitz ◽  
Nir Sorkin ◽  
Gill Smollan ◽  
Irit Barequet
Keyword(s):  
Macular Edema ◽  
Intravitreal Injection ◽  
Diabetic Macular Edema ◽  
Povidone Iodine ◽  
Intravitreal Injections ◽  
Diabetic Patients ◽  
The Third ◽  
Conjunctival Flora ◽  
The Mean ◽  
First Time

Purpose: The purpose was to evaluate the change in the microbiological profile of diabetic patients undergoing intravitreal injections for diabetic macular edema. Methods: Patients were included in this prospective study when referred for the first time for intravitreal injection to treat diabetic macular edema. For each patient, conjunctival cultures were taken from the lower fornix of each eye prior to the povidone-iodine application and the intravitreal injection. An additional culture was taken from the treated eye 20 min after the injection. The same culture protocol was used for the two following injections of these patients. A later conjunctival culture was also taken a month after the last injection. Results: Twenty-one eyes of 21 patients were included. The mean duration of diabetes was 13.7 ± 7.9 years. Prior to the first intravitreal injection, 33% of cultures were positive. Prior to the third intravitreal injection, 26% of cultures were positive ( p = 0.63), and 1 month after the last injection, 18% of cultures were positive ( p = 0.495). The mean HbA1C was 8.1% ± 1.7%. HbA1C of patients with positive cultures was 8.0% ± 1.1% at the first intravitreal injection and 8.2% ± 1.0% at the third intravitreal injection. This was compared with HBA1C in eyes with negative cultures: 7.4% ± 1.2% ( p = 0.45) and 7.1% ± 1.0% ( p = 0.14), respectively. Conclusion: Repeated intravitreal injection for diabetic macular edema with application of povidone-iodine 5% in diabetic patients did not lead to a significant change in the percentage of positive conjunctival cultures. Patients with higher HbA1C had a slight, non-statistically significant trend for positive cultures.

scholarly journals Aqueous humour concentrations of PEDF and Erythropoietin are not influenced by subthreshold micropulse laser treatment of diabetic macular edema

2019 ◽  
Vol 39 (6) ◽  
Author(s):  
Edoardo Midena ◽  
Silvia Bini ◽  
Luisa Frizziero ◽  
Elisabetta Pilotto ◽  
Graziana Esposito ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Macular Edema ◽  
Diabetic Macular Edema ◽  
Aqueous Humour ◽  
Pigment Epithelium ◽  
Retinal Pigment ◽  
Future Research ◽  
Micropulse Laser ◽  
Subthreshold Micropulse Laser ◽  
Treatment Naïve ◽  
Glass Chip

Abstract Purpose: To determine if aqueous humour (AH) concentrations of Retinal Pigment Epithelium (RPE)’s biomarkers are modified after subthreshold micropulse laser (SMPL) treatment of diabetic macular edema (DME). Methods: Naïve DME and healthy subjects were enrolled. All DME patients received SMPL treatments (577-nm yellow light, 5% duty cycle of 0.2 s, power 250 mW), according to study protocol. AH of DME eyes was sampled at baseline and periodically after first SMPL treatment. Control eyes were sampled before cataract surgery. Pigment Epithelium Derived Factor (PEDF) and Erythropoietin (EPO) were quantified with glass-chip protein array. Results: Eighteen DME patients (central retinal thickness ≤ 400 μm on Spectral Domain Optical Coherence Tomography (SD-OCT)) and ten controls were enrolled. The main exclusion criteria were high refractive error, proliferative diabetic retinopathy, glaucoma and neurodegenerative disorders. PEDF concentration was decreased in DME patients at baseline versus controls (P=0.012), while EPO was increased (P=0.029). Both molecules’ concentrations remained stable during follow-up after treatments, compared with DME-baseline. Conclusions: The AH concentrations of RPE biomarkers were significantly different in DME treatment-naïve eyes versus controls. The expression of PEDF and EPO remained unchanged after treatments with SMPL in DME eyes. These data are relevant for future research and applications of SMPL.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document