Managing Type 1 Diabetes at School: An Integrative Review

2009 ◽  
Vol 25 (1) ◽  
pp. 55-61 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rebecca Tolbert
2021 ◽  
pp. 019394592110322
Author(s):  
Kathleen M. Hanna ◽  
Jed R. Hansen ◽  
Kim A. Harp ◽  
Kelly J. Betts ◽  
Diane Brage Hudson ◽  
...  

Although theoretical and empirical writings on habits and routines are a promising body of science to guide interventions, little is known about such interventions among emerging adults with type 1 diabetes. Thus, an integrative review was conducted to describe interventions in relation to habits and routines, their influence on outcomes, and users’ perspectives. A medical librarian conducted a search. Teams screened titles, abstracts, and articles based upon predefined criteria. Evidence from the final 11 articles was synthesized. A minority of investigators explicitly articulated habits and routines theoretical underpinnings as part of the interventions. However, text messaging or feedback via technology used in other interventions could be implicitly linked to habits and routines. For the most part, these interventions positively influenced diabetes self-management-related behaviors and health outcomes. In general, the interventions were perceived positively by users. Future research is advocated using habit and routine theoretical underpinnings to guide interventions.


2014 ◽  
Vol 41 (1) ◽  
pp. 43-58 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lisa Rasbach ◽  
Carolyn Jenkins ◽  
Lori Laffel

Purpose The purpose of this study is to assess the extant literature on instruments used to measure self-efficacy in youth with type 1 diabetes (T1DM) and their caregivers and to critically evaluate these measurements. Methods An integrative review (2003-2013) was conducted searching PsycINFO, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), and US National Library of Medicine PubMed service (PubMed) databases using key words diabetes, type 1 diabetes, and self-efficacy. The authors reviewed the resulting 294 references for inclusion criteria of (a) sample of youth with T1DM or sample of caregivers of youth with T1DM, (b) description of the self-efficacy instrument as primary research, and (c) the instrument measured self-efficacy specifically related to diabetes management. Forty-five articles out of the initial 294 met criteria. Results Of the 45 articles, 10 different self-efficacy instruments were identified. The primary theoretical framework used was Bandura’s social cognitive theory and model of self-efficacy. Most participants were white middle-class T1DM youth. Evaluations to assess validity often were not reported; however, a majority of studies reported high internal consistency of the instruments. Conclusions Sample homogeneity could limit the applicability of results to certain patient populations. Further psychometric analysis, including validity assessments, should be conducted in more diverse samples. Development of valid and reliable instruments for measuring self-efficacy that are sensitive to change across a wider caregiver base over time is necessary. While this review examined reliable and valid instruments used in research, future opportunities include evaluation of measuring self-efficacy in T1DM youth exposed to recent advances in diabetes management technologies.


2018 ◽  
pp. 135910531881735 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rossella Messina ◽  
Mette Due-Christensen ◽  
Anita Keller-Senn ◽  
Elzbieta Polek ◽  
Maria Pia Fantini ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 18 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Robin Whittemore ◽  
Roberta Delvy ◽  
Margaret M. McCarthy

2019 ◽  
Vol 29 (5) ◽  
pp. 1467-1483 ◽  
Author(s):  
Silvia Fornasini ◽  
Francesco Miele ◽  
Enrico M. Piras

2018 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. e11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marion Waite ◽  
Clare Martin ◽  
Rachel Franklin ◽  
David Duce ◽  
Rachel Harrison

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document