Intravenous immunoglobulins in systemic lupus erythematosus: from the bench to the bedside

Lupus ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 18 (10) ◽  
pp. 884-888 ◽  
Author(s):  
G Zandman-Goddard ◽  
M Blank ◽  
Y Shoenfeld
Keyword(s):  
Systemic Lupus Erythematosus ◽  
B Cell ◽  
Lupus Erythematosus ◽  
Immunosuppressive Agents ◽  
Working Party ◽  
Neurological Involvement ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Systemic Lupus ◽  
First Choice ◽  
European Working

This article is an update on the clinical and research data available on systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) therapy that includes some studies performed under the umbrella of the European Working Party on SLE. Various mechanisms of IVIg may play a role, some synergistically, in the modulation of SLE. Recently it has been suggested that IVIg also suppresses the expansion of autoreactive B lymphocytes through signalling of the FcgRIIB, idiotype-mediated inhibition of B cell receptors and neutralisation of cytokines such as the B cell survival factors (B cell activation factor (BAFF and APRIL). In case reports and in open trials, high-dose IVIg (2 g/kg over a 5-day period) has consistently been shown to be a beneficial and safe adjunct therapeutic agent for over 20 manifestations in patients with SLE. It can be given as a first choice of therapy in some cases, for example, in neurological involvement and in those patients who refuse certain immunosuppressive agents such as cyclophosphamide, or in patients who have concomitant infections. Furthermore, IVIg may have a steroid-sparing effect although this characteristic needs further investigation. Specific IVIg (an anti-idiotype to anti-DNA, phosphorylcholine and antiphospholipids) has been shown to be effective in experimental murine models. Hence, extractable IVIg that is directed to the specific pathogenic immunoglobulins will enable the more specific therapy for patients with lupus.

Systemic Lupus Erythematosus and Related Disorders

2014 ◽  
pp. 257-270
Author(s):  
Bonnie L. Bermas
Keyword(s):  
Systemic Lupus Erythematosus ◽  
Central Nervous System ◽  
Nervous System ◽  
Lupus Erythematosus ◽  
Immunosuppressive Agents ◽  
Future Research ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Childbearing Age ◽  
Systemic Lupus ◽  
Multisystem Disease

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a multisystem disease that preferentially affects women of childbearing age. This disorder is both more common and more severe in individuals of African and Asian ancestry. The etiology of SLE is not well understood, although genetics and environmental stimuli clearly are involved. Whether this disease is caused by a T-cell, B-cell, or other immunologic malfunction is debated, but all would agree that clearly autoantibodies such as antinuclear antibodies and anti–double-stranded DNA contribute to the pathophysiology of this disorder. This multisystem disease can affect the skin, joints, lungs, heart, kidneys, and central nervous system. Most of the morbidity and mortality is from renal and central nervous system (CNS) involvement, although accelerated atherosclerosis has recently been appreciated as a major contributor to disease burden. The treatment of SLE has improved over the past decade with less reliance on high-dose corticosteroids and more emphasis on immunosuppressive agents. It is our hope that future research into the pathophysiology of this disorder and the development of more specific therapy, such as biologics, will improve the outcome of this disease.

European Working Party on Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: a 10 year report

Lupus ◽  
2001 ◽  
Vol 10 (12) ◽  
pp. 892-894 ◽  
Author(s):  
R Cervera ◽  
M A Khamashta ◽  
J Font ◽  
G RV Hughes ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Systemic Lupus Erythematosus ◽  
Lupus Erythematosus ◽  
Working Party ◽  
Systemic Lupus ◽  
European Working

scholarly journals Systemic lupus erythematosus complicated with reversible posterior encephalopathy syndrome: a case report

2021 ◽  
Vol 49 (7) ◽  
pp. 030006052110297
Author(s):  
Dong-Lin Hao ◽  
Yan-Li Yang ◽  
La-Mei Zhou ◽  
Qiu-Hong Liu ◽  
Rui Liu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systemic Lupus Erythematosus ◽  
Blood Pressure ◽  
Lupus Erythematosus ◽  
Signal Intensity ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Systemic Lupus ◽  
First Choice ◽  
High Dose Methylprednisolone ◽  
Posterior Encephalopathy ◽  
Reversible Posterior Encephalopathy Syndrome

A 28-year-old female patient was hospitalized primarily because of “intermittent fever for 28 days aggravated by systemic rashes, oral ulcer, and edema in both eyelids for 5 days.” During treatment, convulsions and loss of consciousness occurred. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the head revealed an abnormal signal with shadows in the bilateral frontal, parietal, temporal, and occipital lobes; cerebellar hemispheres; and basal nodes, with high signal intensity on T2 weighted imaging (T2WI), on fluid-attenuated inversion-recovery, and of the apparent diffusion coefficient and low signal intensity on T1WI and diffusion weighted imaging. Therefore, the patient was diagnosed with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) with reversible posterior encephalopathy syndrome (RPES). Intravenous high-dose methylprednisolone and cyclophosphamide were administered for blood pressure control, which effectively controlled the disease. Therefore, when patients with SLE and hypertension or renal insufficiency or those receiving high-dose methylprednisolone or immunosuppressants suddenly present with neurologic abnormalities, a diagnosis of RPES must be considered, and head MRI is the first choice for diagnosis of this disease. In terms of treatment, the blood pressure should be quickly controlled, and the primary disease should be aggressively treated.

Immunogenetic studies on systemic lupus erythematosus

Lupus ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 18 (10) ◽  
pp. 878-883 ◽  
Author(s):  
GD Sebastiani ◽  
M Galeazzi
Keyword(s):  
Systemic Lupus Erythematosus ◽  
Lupus Erythematosus ◽  
Adaptive Immune System ◽  
Working Party ◽  
Systemic Lupus ◽  
Genetic Studies ◽  
Adaptive Immune ◽  
Genome Wide ◽  
European Working ◽  
Multiple Abnormalities

Understanding the pathogenesis of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) remains a considerable challenge. Multiple abnormalities of both the innate and adaptive immune system have been described and, furthermore, immunological dysfunction precedes clinical presentation by many years. There is a strong genetic basis to SLE, which means that genetic studies can play a key role in furthering our understanding of this disease. Because susceptibility variants are present from birth and are unaffected by the course of the disease, or by its treatment, genetic analysis is, perhaps uniquely, capable of identifying fundamental, causative, disease mechanisms. In this article, we review our SLE immunogenetic studies performed in collaboration with the European Working Party on Systemic Lupus Erythematosus. By considering the results of our research and the recent advances obtained by genome-wide associations’ studies, we can begin to understand how dysregulation at a number of key immunological steps may predispose to the development of SLE.

Networking in Europe for special centres of excellence for autoimmune diseases

Lupus ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 18 (10) ◽  
pp. 930-932 ◽  
Author(s):  
C Vasconcelos ◽  
R Cervera
Keyword(s):  
Systemic Lupus Erythematosus ◽  
Autoimmune Diseases ◽  
Lupus Erythematosus ◽  
Antiphospholipid Antibodies ◽  
Working Party ◽  
Systemic Lupus ◽  
International Networks ◽  
European Forum ◽  
European Working ◽  
Centres Of Excellence

The studies developed by the European Working Party on Systemic Lupus Erythematosus and the European Forum on Antiphospholipid Antibodies stress the importance of the creation of international networks devoted to the study of autoimmune diseases and the need for centres of excellence in the management of these conditions. This article analyses the importance of such centres and networks in Europe.

scholarly journals OP0005 ELEVATED STAT1 EXPRESSION BUT NOT PHOSPHORYLATION IN LUPUS B CELLS CORRELATES WITH DISEASE ACTIVITY AND INCREASED PLASMABLAST SUSCEPTIBILITY

2020 ◽  
Vol 79 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. 4-5
Author(s):  
A. Aue ◽  
F. Szelinski ◽  
S. Weißenberg ◽  
A. Wiedemann ◽  
T. Rose ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systemic Lupus Erythematosus ◽  
B Cells ◽  
Autoimmune Diseases ◽  
Disease Activity ◽  
B Cell ◽  
Lupus Erythematosus ◽  
Type I ◽  
Type I Ifn ◽  
Systemic Lupus ◽  
B Cell Subsets

Background:Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is characterized by two pathogenic key signatures, type I interferon (IFN) (1.) and B-cell abnormalities (2.). How these signatures are interrelated is not known. Type I-II IFN trigger activation of Janus kinase (JAK) – signal transducer and activator of transcription (STAT).Objectives:JAK-STAT inhibition is an attractive therapeutic possibility for SLE (3.). We assess STAT1 and STAT3 expression and phosphorylation at baseline and after IFN type I and II stimulation in B-cell subpopulations of SLE patients compared to other autoimmune diseases and healthy controls (HD) and related it to disease activity.Methods:Expression of STAT1, pSTAT1, STAT3 and pSTAT3 in B and T-cells of 21 HD, 10 rheumatoid arthritis (RA), 7 primary Sjögren’s (pSS) and 22 SLE patients was analyzed by flow cytometry. STAT1 and STAT3 expression and phosphorylation in PBMCs of SLE patients and HD after IFNα and IFNγ incubation were further investigated.Results:SLE patients showed substantially higher STAT1 but not pSTAT1 in B and T-cell subsets. Increased STAT1 expression in B cell subsets correlated significantly with SLEDAI and Siglec-1 on monocytes, a type I IFN marker (4.). STAT1 activation in plasmablasts was IFNα dependent while monocytes exhibited dependence on IFNγ.Figure 1.Significantly increased expression of STAT1 by SLE B cells(A) Representative histograms of baseline expression of STAT1, pSTAT1, STAT3 and pSTAT3 in CD19+ B cells of SLE patients (orange), HD (black) and isotype controls (grey). (B) Baseline expression of STAT1 and pSTAT1 or (C) STAT3 and pSTAT3 in CD20+CD27-, CD20+CD27+ and CD20lowCD27high B-lineage cells from SLE (orange) patients compared to those from HD (black). Mann Whitney test; ****p≤0.0001.Figure 2.Correlation of STAT1 expression by SLE B cells correlates with type I IFN signature (Siglec-1, CD169) and clinical activity (SLEDAI).Correlation of STAT1 expression in CD20+CD27- näive (p<0.0001, r=0.8766), CD20+CD27+ memory (p<0.0001, r=0.8556) and CD20lowCD27high (p<0.0001, r=0.9396) B cells from SLE patients with (A) Siglec-1 (CD169) expression on CD14+ cells as parameter of type I IFN signature and (B) lupus disease activity (SLEDAI score). Spearman rank coefficient (r) was calculated to identify correlations between these parameters. *p≤0.05, **p≤0.01. (C) STAT1 expression in B cell subsets of a previously undiagnosed, active SLE patient who was subsequently treated with two dosages of prednisolone and reanalyzed.Conclusion:Enhanced expression of STAT1 by B-cells candidates as key node of two immunopathogenic signatures (type I IFN and B-cells) related to important immunopathogenic pathways and lupus activity. We show that STAT1 is activated upon IFNα exposure in SLE plasmablasts. Thus, Jak inhibitors, targeting JAK-STAT pathways, hold promise to block STAT1 expression and control plasmablast induction in SLE.References:[1]Baechler EC, Batliwalla FM, Karypis G, Gaffney PM, Ortmann WA, Espe KJ, et al. Interferon-inducible gene expression signature in peripheral blood cells of patients with severe lupus. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003;100(5):2610-5.[2]Lino AC, Dorner T, Bar-Or A, Fillatreau S. Cytokine-producing B cells: a translational view on their roles in human and mouse autoimmune diseases. Immunol Rev. 2016;269(1):130-44.[3]Dorner T, Lipsky PE. Beyond pan-B-cell-directed therapy - new avenues and insights into the pathogenesis of SLE. Nat Rev Rheumatol. 2016;12(11):645-57.[4]Biesen R, Demir C, Barkhudarova F, Grun JR, Steinbrich-Zollner M, Backhaus M, et al. Sialic acid-binding Ig-like lectin 1 expression in inflammatory and resident monocytes is a potential biomarker for monitoring disease activity and success of therapy in systemic lupus erythematosus. Arthritis Rheum. 2008;58(4):1136-45.Disclosure of Interests:Arman Aue: None declared, Franziska Szelinski: None declared, Sarah Weißenberg: None declared, Annika Wiedemann: None declared, Thomas Rose: None declared, Andreia Lino: None declared, Thomas Dörner Grant/research support from: Janssen, Novartis, Roche, UCB, Consultant of: Abbvie, Celgene, Eli Lilly, Roche, Janssen, EMD, Speakers bureau: Eli Lilly, Roche, Samsung, Janssen

scholarly journals The expansion of activated naive DNA autoreactive B cells and its association with disease activity in systemic lupus erythematosus patients

2021 ◽  
Vol 23 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Kittikorn Wangriatisak ◽  
Chokchai Thanadetsuntorn ◽  
Thamonwan Krittayapoositpot ◽  
Chaniya Leepiyasakulchai ◽  
Thanitta Suangtamai ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systemic Lupus Erythematosus ◽  
B Cells ◽  
Disease Activity ◽  
B Cell ◽  
Lupus Erythematosus ◽  
Systemic Lupus ◽  
Autoreactive B Cells ◽  
Dsdna Antibody ◽  
Cell Subpopulations ◽  
B Cell Subsets

Abstract Background Autoreactive B cells are well recognized as key participants in the pathogenesis of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). However, elucidating the particular subset of B cells in producing anti-dsDNA antibodies is limited due to their B cell heterogeneity. This study aimed to identify peripheral B cell subpopulations that display autoreactivity to DNA and contribute to lupus pathogenesis. Methods Flow cytometry was used to detect total B cell subsets (n = 20) and DNA autoreactive B cells (n = 15) in SLE patients’ peripheral blood. Clinical disease activities were assessed in SLE patients using modified SLEDAI-2 K and used for correlation analyses with expanded B cell subsets and DNA autoreactive B cells. Results The increases of circulating double negative 2 (DN2) and activated naïve (aNAV) B cells were significantly observed in SLE patients. Expanded B cell subsets and DNA autoreactive B cells represented a high proportion of aNAV B cells with overexpression of CD69 and CD86. The frequencies of aNAV B cells in total B cell populations were significantly correlated with modified SLEDAI-2 K scores. Further analysis showed that expansion of aNAV DNA autoreactive B cells was more related to disease activity and serum anti-dsDNA antibody levels than to total aNAV B cells. Conclusion Our study demonstrated an expansion of aNAV B cells in SLE patients. The association between the frequency of aNAV B cells and disease activity patients suggested that these expanded B cells may play a role in SLE pathogenesis.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document